Evaluation of Using Patient Specific Zirconium Dioxide Implant Versus Patient Specific Titanium Implant in Treatment of Chronic Condylar Dislocation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Alternate hypothesis that treatment of Tempromandibular joint dislocation with Zirconium Dioxide eminoplasty will be more efficient than using titanium onlays in terms of decreasing maximum inter incisal distance and providing better soft tissue response and post-operative patient satisfaction.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: eminoplasty with patient specific Titanium onlay implant
|
Device: eminoplasty with patient specific Zirconium dioxide onlay implant
Eminoplasties will be done for patient with chronic condylar dislocation using patient specific zirconium dioxide implants
|
Active Comparator: eminoplasty with patient specific zirconium dioxide onlay implant
|
Device: eminoplasty with patient specific Zirconium dioxide onlay implant
Eminoplasties will be done for patient with chronic condylar dislocation using patient specific zirconium dioxide implants
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Difference in Maximal inter incisal distance between pre-operative and post-operative [6 months]
using a caliper the difference between preoperative and postoperative Maximal interincisal opening is recorded (mm)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Patient satisfaction [6 months]
Questioning the patient about if there is any dislocation or any limitation to mandibular movement (yes/no)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient with recurrent dislocation with maximum inter incisal opening over 55mm
-
Long-standing dislocation of the TMJ involving both fixation for more than 3 weeks and the failure of manual reduction
-
Failure of conservative strategies such as orientation to self-limit jaw movement and the use of a chin-cap or bandage
-
Both sexes
-
Age between 18 and 48 years.
-
Highly motivated patients.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Post-menopausal females with osteoporosis
-
Patient with uncontrolled systemic disease
-
pregnancy
-
psychological disorders, drug or alcohol dependency
-
Known allergies or sensitivities to dental materials, including Zirconia, Titanium or general anesthetic agents
-
Inability to return for follow up visits.
-
Refusal of participation from the patient
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Adham Zakaria | Cairo | Egypt |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cairo University
Investigators
- Study Director: Mohammed Kadry Nasr, Doctorate, Lecturer at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department, Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- OMFS 3-3-4