Evaluation of Using Patient Specific Zirconium Dioxide Implant Versus Patient Specific Titanium Implant in Treatment of Chronic Condylar Dislocation

Sponsor
Cairo University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05377593
Collaborator
(none)
20
1
2
12
1.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Alternate hypothesis that treatment of Tempromandibular joint dislocation with Zirconium Dioxide eminoplasty will be more efficient than using titanium onlays in terms of decreasing maximum inter incisal distance and providing better soft tissue response and post-operative patient satisfaction.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: eminoplasty with patient specific Zirconium dioxide onlay implant
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A Randomized Clinical Trial A Trial will be carried out in hospital of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department- Faculty of dentistry Cairo University. Equal Randomization: Participants receiving treatment. Positive Controlled: Both groups receiving treatment. Parallel group study: each group of patients receives single treatment simultaneously.A Randomized Clinical Trial A Trial will be carried out in hospital of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department- Faculty of dentistry Cairo University. Equal Randomization: Participants receiving treatment. Positive Controlled: Both groups receiving treatment. Parallel group study: each group of patients receives single treatment simultaneously.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Masking Description:
Because the two interventions used in this trial are clearly different and easily recognized by the participants and investigators. neither the investigators nor the participants can be blinded.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of Using Patient Specific Zirconium Dioxide Implant Versus Patient Specific Titanium Implant in Treatment of Chronic Condylar Dislocation. A Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 23, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 23, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 23, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: eminoplasty with patient specific Titanium onlay implant

Device: eminoplasty with patient specific Zirconium dioxide onlay implant
Eminoplasties will be done for patient with chronic condylar dislocation using patient specific zirconium dioxide implants

Active Comparator: eminoplasty with patient specific zirconium dioxide onlay implant

Device: eminoplasty with patient specific Zirconium dioxide onlay implant
Eminoplasties will be done for patient with chronic condylar dislocation using patient specific zirconium dioxide implants

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Difference in Maximal inter incisal distance between pre-operative and post-operative [6 months]

    using a caliper the difference between preoperative and postoperative Maximal interincisal opening is recorded (mm)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Patient satisfaction [6 months]

    Questioning the patient about if there is any dislocation or any limitation to mandibular movement (yes/no)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 48 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient with recurrent dislocation with maximum inter incisal opening over 55mm

  • Long-standing dislocation of the TMJ involving both fixation for more than 3 weeks and the failure of manual reduction

  • Failure of conservative strategies such as orientation to self-limit jaw movement and the use of a chin-cap or bandage

  • Both sexes

  • Age between 18 and 48 years.

  • Highly motivated patients.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Post-menopausal females with osteoporosis

  • Patient with uncontrolled systemic disease

  • pregnancy

  • psychological disorders, drug or alcohol dependency

  • Known allergies or sensitivities to dental materials, including Zirconia, Titanium or general anesthetic agents

  • Inability to return for follow up visits.

  • Refusal of participation from the patient

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Adham Zakaria Cairo Egypt

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Cairo University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohammed Kadry Nasr, Doctorate, Lecturer at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department, Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Adham Zakaria, Teaching Assistant at Oral and Maxillofacial Sugery department, Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05377593
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • OMFS 3-3-4
First Posted:
May 17, 2022
Last Update Posted:
May 17, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 17, 2022