Reduced Ability to Make Decisions: a Study That Observe Differences in Patients With Fibromyalgia and Healthy Control

Sponsor
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06118970
Collaborator
(none)
90
1
7
12.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The literature has identified impairments in various cognitive functions, including learning, memory, attention, psychomotor speed, executive function, and working memory. However, only a few studies to date have investigated impairment in the decision-making process.

The aim of this study is to evaluate decision-making skills in a group of patients with fibromyalgia and compare these results with a group of healthy controls. Specifically, investigators will evaluate four hypotheses:

  1. Patients with fibromyalgia may show disadvantageous decision-making in contexts of emotional decision-making and may persevere more in their wrong choices. For this reason, investigators hypothesize that patients with fibromyalgia will more frequently choose the disadvantageous decks than the healthy control group in the Iowa Gambling Task.

  2. Secondly, investigators hypothesize that patients with fibromyalgia need more time to make their choice. Consistent with this hypothesis, researchers expect to find significant differences in the average time taken by the participant to make a choice in the Iowa Gambling Task.

  3. The third hypothesis is that patients with fibromyalgia may have greater difficulty inhibiting automatic responses, which may lead to longer reaction times in the Stroop task. investigators also hypothesize that stimuli with negative emotional valence (related to the typical pain experience in fibromyalgia) may have a greater effect on patients with fibromyalgia than on healthy controls (longer reaction time in the emotional Stroop Task compared to healthy controls).

  4. Finally, investigators hypothesize that anxiety and depression may be related to worse performance in ability-based tasks.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Neuropsychological tasks and self-report questionnaires

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
90 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
Impaired Decision-making Capacity in Patients Suffering From Fibromyalgia: an Observational Cross-sectional Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2024
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Patients with fibromyalgia syndrome

Patients with fibromyalgia will be recruited at the UZ hospital in Brussels, at the Saint Luc hospital in Brussels, at local patient organisations (e.g. VLFP), at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel and via social media alerts. This syndrome must be confirmed by a medical diagnosis. Patients with other diagnoses will be excluded from this study (e.g., osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-cancer pain, as well as patients with primary psychiatric/neurological conditions or psychopathological disorders). Subjects with a history of substance abuse or pathological gambling will also be excluded.

Other: Neuropsychological tasks and self-report questionnaires
Being a cross-sectional observational study, no intervention will be administered. Subjects will be assessed with neuropsychological tasks and self-report questionnaires.

Healthy controls

Healthy controls will be recruited through the University of Brussels or through social media alerts. Their exclusion criteria included, in addition to those specified for the fibromyalgia group, those who were suffering from fibromyalgia or had a severe rheumatic illness. Subjects should not have pain currently or have a recent history of pain (within the past 3 months).

Other: Neuropsychological tasks and self-report questionnaires
Being a cross-sectional observational study, no intervention will be administered. Subjects will be assessed with neuropsychological tasks and self-report questionnaires.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Iowa gambling task (IGT) [Baseline (cross sectional)]

    This task is designed to assess cognitive function in emotional decision-making. It is a computerized decision-making task that involves uncertainty, risk assessment, and the evaluation of both reinforcement and punishment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Stroop task and Emotional Stroop task [Baseline (cross sectional)]

    The Stroop test is an instrument for assessing executive functions and aims to measure an individual's ability for selective attention, cognitive flexibility, and inhibition of automatic answers. The Stroop task can also be manipulated to examine how emotional stimuli disrupt colour-naming performance (Emotional Stroop task).

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire [Baseline (cross sectional)]

    The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) is a commonly used instrument in the evaluation of fibromyalgia (FM) patients. It has 21 individual questions. It is divided into three linked sets of domains: 'function' (9 questions), 'overall impact' (2 questions) and 'symptoms' (10 questions). All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'. For the scoring the summed score for function (range 0 to 90) is divided by 3, the summed score for overall impact (range 0 to 20) is not changed, and the summed score for symptoms (range 0 to 100) is divided by 2. The total FIQR is the sum of the three modified domain scores.

  2. Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey [Baseline (cross sectional)]

    It is is a 19-item validated evaluation of social support. The Social Support Survey measures subscale domains that include emotional/information support, tangible support, affectionate support, and positive social interaction support. Items are rated on a scale of 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all the time). Scores range from 19 to 95, with higher scores indicating more social support.

  3. Brief Pain Inventory [Baseline (cross sectional)]

    The BPI was developed to provide a quick and easy means of measuring pain intensity and the extent to which pain interferes in the lives of the pain sufferers. Using this measure, respondents rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity and rate the degree to which pain interferes with 7 domains of functioning (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life) on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A total pain severity score can be found by averaging these items or a single item.

  4. General Decision-Making Style [Baseline (cross sectional)]

    The GDMS was designed to assess how individuals approach decision situations. It distinguishes between 5 decision styles: a rational style, an avoidant style, a dependent style, an intuitive style and a spontaneous style. The scale consists of 25 items, each item has a score ranging from 1 to 5 (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree).

  5. Mental Health Index [Baseline (cross sectional)]

    The MHI is an 18-item questionnaire composed of four subscales (anxiety, depression, behavioural control, and positive affect) and 1 total score. Each item has a score ranging from 1 to 6 (1= all of the time to 6= none of the time).

  6. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [Baseline (cross sectional)]

    The PSQI is the most commonly used generic measure of subjective self-report sleep quality. The measure consists of 19 self-reported items. The PSQI measures several different aspects of sleep, offering seven component scores and one composite score. The component scores consist of subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication and daytime dysfunction. The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Fibromyalgia syndrome (confirmed by a medical diagnosis);

  • Able to understand English or French;

  • Signed an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Other diagnoses (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-cancer pain, as well as patients with primary psychiatric/neurological conditions or psychopathological disorders);

  • History of substance abuse or pathological gambling.

  • Not have pain currently or have a recent history of pain (ONLY FOR HEALTY CONTROL GROUP).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Brussels Capital Region Belgium 1000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Polli, Researcher, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Andrea Polli, postdoctoral researcher, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06118970
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • DeMa_FM_P01
First Posted:
Nov 7, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Nov 8, 2023
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Andrea Polli, postdoctoral researcher, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 8, 2023