REMEDY-PILOT: Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation in Patients With Ischaemia and Non-obstructed Coronary Arteries and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

Sponsor
Imperial College London (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05492110
Collaborator
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Other), East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (Other), Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (Other), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (Other), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (Other), Kingston Hospital NHS Trust (Other), London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (Other), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (Other), Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (Other), St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Other), Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Other)
54
1
2
36
1.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of the CS Reducer for the treatment of patients with ischaemia and non-obstructed coronary arteries (INOCA) and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and through a nested mechanistic substudy investigate the physiological responses in the coronary microcirculation responsible for changes in myocardial perfusion.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Coronary sinus reducer
  • Other: Sham-procedure
  • Diagnostic Test: Invasive coronary physiology
N/A

Detailed Description

Symptomatic angina in patients with ischaemia and non-obstructed coronary arteries (INOCA) is common and associated with increased morbidity and adverse outcomes. Myocardial ischaemia often arises from coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Current treatments are limited, and novel evidence-based therapies are needed to address this large unmet clinical need. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CS Reducer) is a new treatment for refractory angina, which creates a focal narrowing in the coronary sinus that increases back pressure and redistributes blood into ischaemic myocardium at the level of the microcirculation. However the precise mechanism remains unknown. This study will be a randomised double-blinded sham-controlled pilot study (REMEDY-PILOT) to confirm acceptability of CS Reducer implantation, demonstrate feasibility to recruit and quantify its effect on myocardial perfusion. A nested mechanistic substudy within REMEDY-PILOT will test the hypothesis that CS Reducer implantation alters measures of invasive coronary microcirculatory physiology as the mechanistic basis for observed changes in quantitative CMR stress perfusion, symptoms and quality of life.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
54 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled pilot study with parallel arms of participants randomised to CS Reducer or sham procedureRandomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled pilot study with parallel arms of participants randomised to CS Reducer or sham procedure
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Participants will be randomised and blinded to CS Reducer of sham procedure. All follow-up assessments will be performed by a blinded parallel team to ensure blinded outcomes analysis.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
REducing Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Angina, Ischaemia and unobstructED coronarY Arteries - a PILOT Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Aug 6, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 6, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 7, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: CS Reducer implantation

Device: Coronary sinus reducer
The Neovasc coronary sinus reducer is an hourglass-shaped stainless steel device inserted percutaneously into the coronary sinus and currently indicated for the treatment of refractory angina.

Diagnostic Test: Invasive coronary physiology
Invasive coronary physiology assessment as part of REMEDY-MECH mechanistic substudy

Sham Comparator: Sham procedure

Other: Sham-procedure
Implantation procedure with no device implanted

Diagnostic Test: Invasive coronary physiology
Invasive coronary physiology assessment as part of REMEDY-MECH mechanistic substudy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. number of patients consenting to participate in the study. [6 months]

    Consent rate

  2. Premature withdrawal rate including reasons for withdrawal [6 months]

    Registry of patients either failing screening or unwilling to consent to full trial

  3. Change in myocardial perfusion [6 months]

    Change at 6 months post randomisation, compared to baseline, in quantitative myocardial perfusion (global myocardial perfusion reserve [MPR]) assessed by cardiac MRI.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Score [6 months]

    Change in CCS class from baseline to 6 months post-randomisation. The CCS grading system for angina is a clinical tool used by doctors to assess the degree of severity of a patient's angina. Possible scores range from Class 0 (asymptomatic angina) to Class IV (angina at rest).

  2. Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) score [6 months]

    Change in SAQ score from baseline to 6 months. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a disease-specific questionnaire used to quantify patients' symptoms of angina and the extent to which their angina affects their functioning and quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (daily angina) to 100 (no angina). Lower scores indicate worse angina symptoms.

  3. Short-form 36 (SF-36) [6 months]

    Change in SF-36 scores from baseline to 6 months. Validated questionnaire to assess quality of life. 36 items each scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a more favourable health state.

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [6 months]

    Change in HADS score from baseline to 6 months. Scores range from 0 to 21. Normal results are indicated by lower scores. Validated questionnaire to assess psychological wellbeing.

  5. 6-minute walk test (6MWT) [6 months]

    Change in exercise capacity from baseline to 6 months. Distance in metres walked in 6 minutes.

  6. BORG scale of perceived exertion [6 months]

    Change in BORG scale from baseline to 6 months. Scores range from 0 to 20 (BORG scale) or 0 to 10 (Modified BORG scale). The higher the self-reported score, the greater perceived exertion.

  7. Safety events - rate of major adverse events [6 months]

    The rate of occurrence of a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), pericardial effusion requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention, device embolisation, or BARC 3 or 5 bleeding evaluation in the CS Reducer arm compared to the sham-procedure arm.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Change in absolute global myocardial perfusion (ml/min/g) at rest and during adenosine stress (transmural, endocardial, epicardial) from baseline to 6 months post-randomisation [6 months]

  2. Change in absolute myocardial perfusion (ml/min/g) at rest and during adenosine stress (transmural, endocardial, epicardial) from baseline to 6 months post-randomisation in the distribution territory of the left coronary circulation. [6 months]

  3. Change in global endocardial:epicardial perfusion ratio at rest and after adenosine stress from baseline to 6 months post-randomisation [6 months]

  4. Change in endocardial:epicardial perfusion ratio at rest and after adenosine stress from baseline to 6 months post-randomisation in the distribution territory of the left coronary circulation. [6 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age >18 years

  2. Ongoing symptomatic angina, CCS Class II-IV, for ≥3 months despite background treatment with at least two anti-anginal drug at the maximal tolerated dose.

  3. Patients willing to consider no change in anti-anginal drug treatment for the duration of their participation in the trial.

  4. Unobstructed coronary arteries with ≤30% epicardial stenoses demonstrated on coronary angiography.

  5. Circumferential subendocardial stress-induced hypoperfusion on CMR (global MPR < 2.5).

  6. Willingness to comply with the specified follow-up evaluation and to be contactable during the period of the trial.

  7. Understands the nature of the trial procedures and provides written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Epicardial CAD (stenoses > 30%), previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting, or myocardial infarction (MI).

  2. Abnormal coronary sinus anatomy (tortuosity, aberrant branch, persistent left superior vena cava)

  3. Coronary sinus diameter at site of implant <9.5mm or >13mm

  4. Mean right atrial pressure <15mmHg at time of implantation

  5. Any structural heart disease including left ventricular hypertrophy; cardiomyopathy; severe valvular heart disease; previous valve replacement; myocardial bridge on angiography; LVEF<45% by CMR.

  6. Clinically or angiographically diagnosed coronary vasospasm

  7. Previous hospitalisation for decompensated heart failure

  8. Pacemaker or defibrillator electrode in the right atrium, right ventricle or coronary sinus

  9. Documented arrhythmia requiring planned implantation of a permanent pacemaker or defibrillator

  10. Chronic kidney disease (creatinine >200 μmol/L; established on renal replacement therapy; functioning renal transplant)

  11. Haemoglobin <80g/L

  12. Contraindications to receiving dual anti-platelet therapy

  13. Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (FEV1 <55% predicted)

  14. Moribund patients with life expectancy < 1year

  15. Known allergy to nickel or steel

  16. Current enrolment in another investigational device or drug trial

  17. Contraindications to CMR or receiving intravenous adenosine

  18. Pregnancy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 National Heart and Lung Institute (Brompton Campus), Imperial College London London United Kingdom SW36NP

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Imperial College London
  • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
  • Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  • Kingston Hospital NHS Trust
  • London North West Healthcare NHS Trust
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ranil E de Silva, FRCP, PhD, Imperial College London

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Imperial College London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05492110
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 21IC7301
First Posted:
Aug 8, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Aug 11, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Imperial College London
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 11, 2022