Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusions of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block

Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05320718
Collaborator
Beijing Municipal Health Commission (Other)
140
2
2
29.6
70
2.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting has recently gained with popularity in treatment of coronary artery disease. Compared with conventional approach, it has advantages of less trauma and rapid recovery, but postoperative pain is severe, which may increase the risk of cardiopulmonary complications and cause chronic pain. Therefore, perioperative analgesia is crucial in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.

Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
140 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusions of Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 15, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 22, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: erector spinae plane block

A needle is inserted until the tip contacted the T5 transverse process under ultrasound guidance. After confirming the needle tip position, 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected in the plane between the erector spinae muscles and transverse process. A catheter is inserted through the needle and then connected to a Programmed Electronic Postoperative Analgesia Pump with a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery

Drug: Ropivacaine
20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus and a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery

Active Comparator: thoracic paravertebral block

A needle is inserted into the paravertebral space. After confirming the needle tip position, 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine is injected in the paravertebral space. A catheter is inserted through the needle and then connected to a Programmed Electronic Postoperative Analgesia Pump with a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery.

Drug: Ropivacaine
20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus and a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. pain at cough after surgery [postoperatively 0-3 day]

    Numerical Rating Pain Scale, where 0=No Pain (better outcome) and 10=Intractable Pain (worse outcome)

  2. postoperative rescue analgesic consumption [postoperatively 0-3 day]

    morphine equivalents

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. pain at rest after surgery [postoperatively 0-3 day]

    Numerical Rating Pain Scale, where 0=No Pain (better outcome) and 10=Intractable Pain (worse outcome)

  2. adverse events of regional block [Intraoperative (during and immediately after block performance)]

    local bleeding, pleural puncture, local anesthetic toxicity

  3. dermatome of block [immediately after extubation]

    loss of cold sensation (ice cubes), 3-point scale: 0 = loss of cold sensation, 1=decreased cold sensation, 2 = normal sensation.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. pulmonary function [preoperative and postoperative day 1 and 3]

    parameters measured by bedside spirometer, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/VC, FEF25%, FEF50%, FEF25-75, PEF

  2. postoperative complications: cardiac, pulmonary, cerebral, opioid intake [3 days postoperatively]

    incidence of severe arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, pneumonia, atelectasis, pulmonary edema, postoperative delirium, nausea, vomiting

  3. recovery time [postoperatively, up to 4 weeks]

    Time for extubation, oral intake, chest drain tube removal, discharge from ICU and discharge from hospital

  4. plasma cortisol [preoperative, 24 hours and 72 hours after operation.]

    The investigator will measure the plasma cortisol level at several time points

  5. C-reactive protein [preoperative, 24 hours and 72 hours after operation.]

    The investigator will measure the plasma C-reactive protein level at several time points

  6. plasma troponin T level [preoperative, 24 hours and 72 hours after operation.]

    The investigator will measure the plasma troponin T level at several time points

  7. patient's satisfaction with regional analgesia [3 day postoperatively]

    Patient overall satisfaction with regional analgesia will be assessed on a 11 point scale, 0=not satisfied at all, 10=extremely satisfied

  8. time to perform the block [immediately before surgery]

    from identify the landmark using ultrasound to catheter fixation

  9. CK-MB [preoperative, 24 hours and 72 hours after operation]

    The investigator will measure the plasma CK-MB level at several time points

  10. performance in activities of daily living (ADL) [3 month and 6 month postoperatively]

    Post-operative follow-up phone calls will be used to assess performance in activities of daily living (ADL) with the Barthelindex of ADL

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients undergoing elective minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting
Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Contraindications to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, infection of the skin at the site of needle puncture area, et al)

  2. Morbid obesity (body mass index > 35 kg/m2)

  3. Allergy to any of the study drugs

  4. Chronic opioid use or history of opioid abuse.

  5. Inability to understand pain score

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Anesthesiology,Peking University Third Hospital Beijing Beijing China 100191
2 Peking University Third Hosptial Beijing China 100191

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Peking University Third Hospital
  • Beijing Municipal Health Commission

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Min Li, MD, Peking University Third Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Li Min, Vice Director of the Department of Anesthesiology, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor, Peking University Third Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05320718
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ESPB vs PVB for MIDCAB
First Posted:
Apr 11, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Apr 27, 2022
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 27, 2022