Relapse and Failure Rates Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fixed Retainers
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the differences in relapse and failure rates in patients treated with fixed retainers (FRs) using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing technology, lab-based technique, and chairside method.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: CAD/CAM group
|
Other: Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing Retainers
Custom-bent fixed retainer wires from an in-office CAD/CAM system with FixR software and the BenderI machine (YOAT Corporation, Lynwood, WA). Dentaflex wires- round, 0.5mm in diameter, three-stranded Stainless Steel (Dentaurum GmbH & Co., Ispringen, Germany)- were used for the CAD/CAM group
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Lab group
|
Other: Lab-based Retainers
The lab group used the same type of wire as the CAD/CAM group but was manually bent by a lab technician
|
Active Comparator: Chairside group
|
Other: Chairside Retainers
The chairside group used three-stranded Stainless Steel, 0.974mm x 0.402 mm, flexible Ortho-FlexTech wires (Reliance, Itasca, IL)
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in intercanine width (ICW) [2 years]
ICW was measured on the Meshlab software using the 3D ruler measurement tool. Pre-treatment, post-treatment, and post-retention measures were recorded and any change in the ICW was considered relapse.
- Change in Little's Irregularity Index (LII) [2 years]
ICW was measured on the Meshlab software using the 3D ruler measurement tool. Pre-treatment, post-treatment, and post-retention measures were recorded and any change in the LII was considered relapse.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
completion of comprehensive orthodontic treatment
-
class I molar and canine relationships
-
indication for a fixed retainer on the mandibular anterior teeth.
-
no extractions done as part of their treatment.
-
Treatment with preadjusted edgewise appliance.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
refusal to participate
-
refusal to have fixed retainers
-
poor oral hygiene
-
non-compliance
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Saint Louis University | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 63104 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Nourhan M.Aly
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Giau Tran, Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
- Principal Investigator: Ryan Rucker, Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
- Study Chair: Patrick Foley, PhD, Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
- Study Chair: Brent Bankhead, Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
- Study Director: Samar M Adel, PhD, Alexandria University
- Study Director: Ki B Kim, Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 32524