Reliability of Pachymetry Measurement With FD-oCT, ORA, Confoscan 4 and Ultrasound

Sponsor
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT00838422
Collaborator
(none)
100
1
12
8.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central corneal thickness measured by Fourier Domain Optical Coherence tomography (FD-OCT, OptoVue, USA) with anterior corneal module, 20MHz ultrasound pachymetry equipped with Ocular response analyzer (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, USA) and 10MHz Ultrasound Pachymetry (USP).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Corneal thickness measurements are clinically important. Variation in corneal thickness affects the accuracy of applanation tonometry. A meta-analysis by Doughty and Zaman showed that a 10% change in central corneal thickness may result in an approximately 3.4-mmHg change in intraocular pressure.1 Accuracy of corneal thickness measurement is also important in considering eligibility for refractive surgery, and the amount of correction that can safely be performed. Underestimation of corneal thickness may lead to eligible patients being excluded for primary or enhancement refractive procedures. Overestimation may lead to over-ablation and inadvertent thinning of the stroma, thereby increasing the risk of iatrogenic keratectasia. Hence, studies assessing corneal thickness measurements by various instruments are of high clinical relevance.2-9 Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT, OptoVue, U.S.A), Confoscan 4 (CS-4, Nidek, USA) and ocular response analyzer (ORA, Reichert, USA) are non-invasive medical devices that have recently received FDA approval for measurement of the cornea thickness. However, the repeatability and reproducibility of these instruments remains unproven in the clinical settings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe agreement, repeatability and reproducibility in corneal pachymetric mapping between FD-OCT, ORA, CS-4 and conventional ultrasound (US), which has been the current reference corneal pachymetric mapping system for the majority of refractive surgeons.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    100 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Repeatability and Reproducibility of Pachymetric Mapping With Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography, Ocular Response Analyzer, Confoscan 4 and Ultrasound
    Study Start Date :
    Jun 1, 2008
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Jan 1, 2009
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Jun 1, 2009

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    FD-OCT, ORA, USP

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurement [3 months]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Comparing central corneal thickness measurement among FD-OCT, ORA, and USP [3 months]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    20 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Healthy Volunteers
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients who had history of prior ocular surgery, ocular abnormalities other than cataract or refractive error or were unable to cooperate in the examination were excluded.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Pan-Chiao Taipei County Taiwan 220

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Shu-Wen Chang, MD, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00838422
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • FEMH97010
    First Posted:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 6, 2009