Cryoablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Renal Masses
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to verify the oncological efficacy and safety of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small renal tumors.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
By enrolling all patients treated with CA or RFA, this study will document for the first time the safety and the short and long term efficacy of CA compared to RFA as well as provide urologists and decision makers currently unavailable information on CA in Canada.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cryoablation
|
Procedure: Cryoablation
Cryoneedles and one temperature probe are inserted under endoscopic and sonographic guidance.
|
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency ablation Radiofrequency ablation |
Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation
Thermal injury is the predominant mechanism of action of RFA. A high-frequency alternating current emitted from the exposed noninsulated portion of the electrode generates frictional heat, agitating ions in the tissue surrounding the tip of the needle.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Treatment failure rate. [Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Renal function - GFR of less than 60 ml per min per 1.73 m2. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance. [Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48]
- Average percentage decrease in tumor size. [Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48]
- Intra and post-operative complications rates. [Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48]
- Quality of life data. [Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with tumors that progress in size while on a watchful waiting protocol;
-
Patients with multiple tumors;
-
Patients with a tumor in a solitary kidney;
-
Patients with poor renal function and a renal tumor;
-
Patients with significant co-morbidities that may benefit from a less invasive approach.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Large tumors > 4.0cm;
-
Unable to have a general anesthetic;
-
Unable to comply with follow-up protocol (i.e., routine CT or MRI and a follow-up biopsy);
-
Uncorrectable bleeding diathesis;
-
Evidence of metastatic disease.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | McMaster Institute of Urology - St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton | Hamilton | Ontario | Canada | L8N 4A6 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anil Kapoor, MD, McMaster Institute of Urology, McMaster University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- IIS-001-09