Dual Energy CT vs Standard Triple Phase CT-A Randomised Control Trial
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To compare SBDECT with standard Triple Phase Multi-Detector CT (TPMDCT) in renal mass evaluation in terms of appropriateness of treatment received after diagnosis. To determine SBDECT diagnostic accuracy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: split bolus Patients will undergo diagnostic Split bolus DECT scan |
Other: split bolus Dual energy CT
|
Experimental: Standard Patients will undergo routine multiphase diagnostic CT |
Other: Standard multiphase CT
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Appropriateness of the treatment recieved [1 year]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with suspected renal masses needing further evaluation with a contrast enhanced CT scan
-
Patients who are referred for CT Urography
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients not willing to participate in the study
-
Age <18 yrs
-
Pregnant females
-
Patients with previous h/o serious allergic reactions or Contrast allergy
-
Impaired renal function (estimated GFR<45mL/min/mm2)
-
Sonographically proven benign renal mass needing no further evaluation
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | All India Institute of Medical Sciences | New Delhi | Delhi | India | 110029 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- IESC/T-457/29.11.2013