CERTITEM: Progression of Renal Interstitial Fibrosis / Tubular Atrophy (IF/TA) According to Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and Immunosuppressive Regimen (Everolimus Based Versus CNI Based) in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients

Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01079143
Collaborator
(none)
194
23
4
33
8.4
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Recently, early biomarkers of renal interstitial fibrosis have been identified, amongst them de novo expression of vimentin by tubular epithelial cells, which is an intermediate filament, and the translocation of beta-catenin into their cytoplasm. These markers, when present, suggest that the epithelial cell undergoes a phenomenon well known as "epithelial to mesenchymal transition" (EMT) and could behaves like a myo-fibroblast. EMT is highly instrumental in several models of tissue fibrosis, including in the kidney. Actually, it has not only been demonstrated that these markers are detectable in the renal graft at an early time point post-transplant (i.e. as soon as three months), but also that the intensity of their expression correlates with the progression of interstitial fibrosis of the graft between 3 and 12 months

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
194 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Open Study to Evaluate the Progression of Renal Graft Fibrosis According to the Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients Treated Either by a CNI Free Immunosuppressive Regimen With Everolimus and Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium or a CNI Based Regimen With Cyclosporine and Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Certican EMT+

Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.

Drug: Certican®
Certican® was supplied to the participating centers by Novartis for the whole duration of the study in the form of tablets containing 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25 mg and packaged in blister packs.
Other Names:
  • Everolimus
  • RAD001
  • Drug: Myfortic
    Myfortic ® was supplied to the participating centers for the duration of the study in the form of 180 and 360 mg gastro-resistant, film-coated tablets. Myfortic® treatment was provided to patients preoperatively or within 24 hours post-transplantation according to the practices of the center. The starting dose was generally 1,440 mg/day, in 2 daily oral fractions, administered at 12 hour intervals up to randomization. Depending on the practices of the center and for the first 6 weeks post-transplantation, a maximum daily dose of 2160 mg of Myfortic® could be administered. In the Neoral® group, the daily dose of 1440 mg was maintained throughout the study. In the Certican® group, the dose was halved (i.e. 720 mg/day) on introducing Certican® and maintained at 720 mg/day until the end of the study. An increase in the daily dose of Myfortic® (in the Certican® group) was not authorized unless this was a temporary increase that did not exceed a period of 14 consecutive days.

    Drug: Simulect®
    The administration of Simulect® was part of the standard immunosuppressant therapy. This induction therapy was provided to patients in the form of commercial ampoules each containing 20 mg. Simulect® was administered to each patient at the dose of 20 mg on D0 and D4 post-transplantation.
    Other Names:
  • basiliximab
  • Drug: Corticosteroids
    An intravenous steroid treatment could be administered peri or intraoperatively according to local practice at each center. Oral steroid treatment was quickly introduced (in the week following transplantation) at a daily dose of 20 mg and was then reduced and continued throughout the study at a minimum dose of 5 mg/day.

    Experimental: Certican EMT-

    Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.

    Drug: Certican®
    Certican® was supplied to the participating centers by Novartis for the whole duration of the study in the form of tablets containing 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25 mg and packaged in blister packs.
    Other Names:
  • Everolimus
  • RAD001
  • Drug: Myfortic
    Myfortic ® was supplied to the participating centers for the duration of the study in the form of 180 and 360 mg gastro-resistant, film-coated tablets. Myfortic® treatment was provided to patients preoperatively or within 24 hours post-transplantation according to the practices of the center. The starting dose was generally 1,440 mg/day, in 2 daily oral fractions, administered at 12 hour intervals up to randomization. Depending on the practices of the center and for the first 6 weeks post-transplantation, a maximum daily dose of 2160 mg of Myfortic® could be administered. In the Neoral® group, the daily dose of 1440 mg was maintained throughout the study. In the Certican® group, the dose was halved (i.e. 720 mg/day) on introducing Certican® and maintained at 720 mg/day until the end of the study. An increase in the daily dose of Myfortic® (in the Certican® group) was not authorized unless this was a temporary increase that did not exceed a period of 14 consecutive days.

    Drug: Simulect®
    The administration of Simulect® was part of the standard immunosuppressant therapy. This induction therapy was provided to patients in the form of commercial ampoules each containing 20 mg. Simulect® was administered to each patient at the dose of 20 mg on D0 and D4 post-transplantation.
    Other Names:
  • basiliximab
  • Drug: Corticosteroids
    An intravenous steroid treatment could be administered peri or intraoperatively according to local practice at each center. Oral steroid treatment was quickly introduced (in the week following transplantation) at a daily dose of 20 mg and was then reduced and continued throughout the study at a minimum dose of 5 mg/day.

    Active Comparator: Neoral EMT+

    Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.

    Drug: Neoral
    Neoral® was also supplied to participating centers for the entire duration of the study in the form of soft capsules of 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg, and packaged in blister packs.
    Other Names:
  • Cyclosporine
  • Drug: Myfortic
    Myfortic ® was supplied to the participating centers for the duration of the study in the form of 180 and 360 mg gastro-resistant, film-coated tablets. Myfortic® treatment was provided to patients preoperatively or within 24 hours post-transplantation according to the practices of the center. The starting dose was generally 1,440 mg/day, in 2 daily oral fractions, administered at 12 hour intervals up to randomization. Depending on the practices of the center and for the first 6 weeks post-transplantation, a maximum daily dose of 2160 mg of Myfortic® could be administered. In the Neoral® group, the daily dose of 1440 mg was maintained throughout the study. In the Certican® group, the dose was halved (i.e. 720 mg/day) on introducing Certican® and maintained at 720 mg/day until the end of the study. An increase in the daily dose of Myfortic® (in the Certican® group) was not authorized unless this was a temporary increase that did not exceed a period of 14 consecutive days.

    Drug: Simulect®
    The administration of Simulect® was part of the standard immunosuppressant therapy. This induction therapy was provided to patients in the form of commercial ampoules each containing 20 mg. Simulect® was administered to each patient at the dose of 20 mg on D0 and D4 post-transplantation.
    Other Names:
  • basiliximab
  • Drug: Corticosteroids
    An intravenous steroid treatment could be administered peri or intraoperatively according to local practice at each center. Oral steroid treatment was quickly introduced (in the week following transplantation) at a daily dose of 20 mg and was then reduced and continued throughout the study at a minimum dose of 5 mg/day.

    Active Comparator: Neoral EMT-

    Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.

    Drug: Neoral
    Neoral® was also supplied to participating centers for the entire duration of the study in the form of soft capsules of 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg, and packaged in blister packs.
    Other Names:
  • Cyclosporine
  • Drug: Myfortic
    Myfortic ® was supplied to the participating centers for the duration of the study in the form of 180 and 360 mg gastro-resistant, film-coated tablets. Myfortic® treatment was provided to patients preoperatively or within 24 hours post-transplantation according to the practices of the center. The starting dose was generally 1,440 mg/day, in 2 daily oral fractions, administered at 12 hour intervals up to randomization. Depending on the practices of the center and for the first 6 weeks post-transplantation, a maximum daily dose of 2160 mg of Myfortic® could be administered. In the Neoral® group, the daily dose of 1440 mg was maintained throughout the study. In the Certican® group, the dose was halved (i.e. 720 mg/day) on introducing Certican® and maintained at 720 mg/day until the end of the study. An increase in the daily dose of Myfortic® (in the Certican® group) was not authorized unless this was a temporary increase that did not exceed a period of 14 consecutive days.

    Drug: Simulect®
    The administration of Simulect® was part of the standard immunosuppressant therapy. This induction therapy was provided to patients in the form of commercial ampoules each containing 20 mg. Simulect® was administered to each patient at the dose of 20 mg on D0 and D4 post-transplantation.
    Other Names:
  • basiliximab
  • Drug: Corticosteroids
    An intravenous steroid treatment could be administered peri or intraoperatively according to local practice at each center. Oral steroid treatment was quickly introduced (in the week following transplantation) at a daily dose of 20 mg and was then reduced and continued throughout the study at a minimum dose of 5 mg/day.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Graft Fibrosis (Primary Comparison - ITT Population [Month 3 (M3) and Month 12 (M12) post transplantation]

      Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) is the percentage (%) of participants with an increase >= 1 in IF/TA grade according to Banff (2005 - 2007)according to Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and by treatment groups. Grade I (the better): mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) Grade II : moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (26-50% of cortical area) Grade III (the worse) : severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (>50% of cortical area)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) [M3 and M12 post transplantation]

      Incidence and severity of IF/TA according to 2005/2007 Banff classification system grades (grades l to lll). IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (>50% of lesions).

    2. Change in Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) Grade [M3 and M12 post transplantation]

      Difference (M12 - M3) in IF/TA grade. IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (>50% of lesions).

    3. Risk Factors of IF/TA Progression [M12 post transplantation]

      Composite factors regarding fibrosis progression at 12 months using a logistic regression model; the parameters initially considered concerned the demographic characteristics of both recipient and donor, transplantation characteristics, hypertension, diabetes, study treatments, immunosuppression, EMT, IF/TA, function at M3, the onset of acute rejection, the presence of anti-donor antibodies at M12, infections and BK virus viremia. Arteriolar hyaline thickening is thickening of the walls of arterioles by the deposition of homogeneous pink hyaline material. BPAR is biopsy proven acute rejection. TEM progression is the increase ≥ 1 of TEM score between Month 3 and Month 12

    4. Change in Percentage of Interstitial Fibrosis (IF) by Numerical Quantification [M3 and M12 post transplantation]

      Percentage of IF measured by numerical quantification. The IF percentage was transposed in grade according to the following rule: grade 0 for an IF % ≤5%, grade I for an IF % ranging from >5% to < 25%, grade II for an IF % ranging from 25 to 50%, grade III for an IF % >50%. Interstitial graft fibrosis has been identified as the primary cause of graft loss following death with a functional graft [3-5].

    5. Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Fibrosis Using Numerical Quantification [M3 to M12 post transplantation]

      Comparisons according to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and immunosuppressive treatment

    6. Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Status [M3 and M12 post transplantation]

      Incidence and severity of EMT status. EMT status was determined centrally using the graft biopsy taken at 3 months. The result was quickly obtained (within 7 to 15 days) and sent to the company in charge of randomization in order to allocate each patient to a treatment group and to provide the investigator with this information without confirming EMT status.

    7. Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Score [M3 and M12 post transplantation]

      Incidence and severity of EMT score. The intensity of EMT markers expression present and detectable in the renal graft at an early stage following transplantation is known as EMT score. EMT score 0 (the best): <1 EMT score 1 (the better): 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2: 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3: 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): >50% of tubular atrophy

    8. Change in EMT Score [M3 and M12 post transplantation]

      Change (M12 - M3) in EMT Score. Progression in EMT score is defined as an increase by >=1 of EMT score from M3 to M12. EMT score 0 (the best): <1 EMT score 1 (the better) : 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2 : 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3 : 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): >50% of tubular atrophy

    9. Incidence (Number) of Subclinical Rejections and Borderline Lesions [M3]

      Incidence of subclinical rejections and borderline lesions with regards to histological evidence of rejection with clinical findings. Subclinical rejections: rejection without clinical symptoms which is diagnosed by chance when a graft biopsy is performed. Clinically suspected BPAR: rejection suspected because of the presence of clinical symptoms (fever, pain, increase of creatinine) and then confirmed by the graft biopsy. Borderline lesions: suspicious for acute T-cell mediated rejection. This category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of tubulitis with minor interstitial infiltration or interstitial infiltration with mild tubulitis.

    10. Change From Baseline (M3) in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) [M3 (baseline) to M12 post transplantation]

      eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²). LOCF = Last observation carried forward

    11. Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at M12 From Baseline (M3) - ANCOVA Model [Baseline (M3), M12]

      The average patient renal function was evaluated on the basis of eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated MDRD formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²).

    12. Change in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (Without Imputation) [Month 3 (baseline), Month 12]

      One of the factors associated with EMT progression between M3 and M12 according to univariate analysis (ITT biopsies M3 & M12).

    13. Treatment Failures [M6 and M12 post transplantation]

      A treatment failure is defined as biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death or a loss to follow up. It was assessed between randomization and 6 and 12 months post-transplantation.

    14. Type of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) [M6 and M12 post transplantation]

      A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation).

    15. Severity of BPAR [M6 and M12 post transplantation]

      A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation).

    16. Incidence (Number) of BPAR [M6 and M12 post transplantation]

      A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system.

    17. Incidence (Number) of Participants With Graft Losses [M6 and M12 post transplantation]

      If a participant underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was considered as the day of graft loss.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    19 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Recipient of a primary or secondary deceased or living (related or not) donor kidney transplant and who requires basiliximab induction therapy.

    • Cold ischemia time < 30 hours.

    • Women of child-bearing age, even those with a history of infertility, must have had a negative pregnancy test during the 7 days before screening or at the time of screening, and must use a recognized and reliable method of contraception throughout the study and for 2 months after discontinuing the study treatment.

    • Patients who want and are able to take part in the entire study, and have given their written consent.

    • Patients who are registered with a French national health insurance scheme or are covered by such a scheme.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Recipient of multi-organ transplantation, including dual kidneys, or who have previously received non renal transplant organ.

    • Patients receiving a graft from a non-heart-beating donor.

    • Anti-HLA antibody levels ≥ 20% in the last 3 months before the inclusion.

    • ABO incompatible graft or with positive cross match T.

    • Severe hyperlipidemia: total cholesterol ≥ 9.1 mmol/L (≥ 350 mg/dL) and/or triglycerides ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (≥ 750 mg/dL) despite appropriate lipid-lowering therapy.

    • Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to mycophenolic acid, cyclosporine or lactose.

    • Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to macrolides or drugs of the mTOR inhibitor class.

    • HIV seropositive, or active chronic hepatitis B (HBs Ab) or C. Results obtained during the 6 months before the inclusion are accepted. Recipients from donors with hepatitis B or C will be excluded.

    • Patients with thrombocytopenia (≤ 75000/mm3), absolute neutrophil count (≤ 1500/mm3), leukocytopenia (≤ 2500/mm3) and/or hemoglobin < 8g/dL at the inclusion visit.

    • ASAT, ALAT or total bilirubin ≥ 3 UNL.

    • Uncontrolled severe infection, severe allergy requiring an acute or chronic treatment.

    • Patients with a malignant disease or previous malignancy in the past 5 years, with the exception of excised basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma and in situ cervical cancer treated.

    • Medical or surgical condition, with the exception of the transplantation, which in the investigator's opinion could exclude the patient.

    • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or of reproductive age and refuse or are unable to use a recognized and reliable method of contraception.

    • Patients with symptoms of significant mental or somatic disease. Inability to cooperate or communicate with the investigator.

    • Patients under supervision or guardianship or any patient subject to legal protection

    Randomization criteria:
    Eligibility criteria (no later than 4 months post-transplantation:
    • Renal graft biopsy performed at M3 and adequate histological material sent within the deadline for the determination of EMT.

    • Woman of child-bearing potential, even in case of a history of infertility, must use a recognized and reliable method of contraception throughout the study and for 2 months after discontinuing the study treatment.

    Non-eligibility criteria (no later than 4 months post-transplantation):
    • Acute rejection histologically proven between transplantation and randomization (local reading).

    • Acute subclinical rejection diagnosed on the M3 biopsy (except borderline lesions) (local reading).

    • Positive anti-donor antibodies at M3.

    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (MDRDa).

    • Proteinuria ≥ 1 g/24h.

    • Severe hyperlipidemia: total cholesterol ≥ 9.1 mmol/L (≥ 350 mg/dL) and/or triglycerides ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (≥ 750 mg/dL) despite appropriate lipid-lowering therapy.

    • Thrombocytopenia (≤ 75000/mm3), absolute neutrophil count (≤ 1500/mm3), leukocytopenia (≤ 2500/mm3) and/or hemoglobin < 8 g/dL.

    • ASAT, ALAT or total bilirubin ≥ 3 UNL.

    • Medical or surgical condition which in the investigator's opinion might exclude the patient.

    Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Novartis Investigative Site Caen Cedex France 14033
    2 Novartis Investigative Site Amiens cedex1 France 80054
    3 Novartis Investigative Site Angers France 49 033
    4 Novartis Investigative Site Bordeaux Cedex France 33076
    5 Novartis Investigative Site Brest France 29200
    6 Novartis Investigative Site Creteil France 94010
    7 Novartis Investigative Site Grenoble France 38043
    8 Novartis Investigative Site Le Kremlin Bicetre France 94275
    9 Novartis Investigative Site Lille Cedex France 59037
    10 Novartis Investigative Site Lyon France 69 437
    11 Novartis Investigative Site Nice Cedex 1 France 06602
    12 Novartis Investigative Site Paris cedex 15 France 75015
    13 Novartis Investigative Site Paris France 75475
    14 Novartis Investigative Site Paris France 75970
    15 Novartis Investigative Site Pierre Benite Cedex France 69495
    16 Novartis Investigative Site Poitiers France 86000
    17 Novartis Investigative Site Reims France 51092
    18 Novartis Investigative Site St Priest en Jarez Cedex France 42277
    19 Novartis Investigative Site Strasbourg France 67091
    20 Novartis Investigative Site Suresnes France 92150
    21 Novartis Investigative Site Toulouse Cedex 4 France 31054
    22 Novartis Investigative Site Tours Cedex France 37044
    23 Novartis Investigative Site Vandoeuvre Les Nancys France 54511

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01079143
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CRAD001AFR10
    • 2009-011473-33
    First Posted:
    Mar 2, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 18, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2014
    Keywords provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail EMT+: ≥ 10% tubular cells showing de novo expression of vimentin (or translocation of β catenin if inconclusive) into the cytoplasm EMT-: < 10% tubular cells showing de novo expression of vimentin (or translocation of β catenin if inconclusive) into the cytoplasm
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 36 60 39 59
    Exposed 36 60 39 59
    Month 3 (M3) Biopsies 36 59 39 59
    Month 12 (M12) Biopsies 26 43 32 53
    M3 and M12 Biopsies 26 43 32 53
    COMPLETED 27 43 34 54
    NOT COMPLETED 9 17 5 5

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT- Total
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 36 60 39 59 194
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    51.2
    (10.7)
    46.4
    (12.9)
    50.0
    (10.0)
    50.7
    (11.7)
    49.3
    (11.7)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    17
    47.2%
    17
    28.3%
    16
    41%
    16
    27.1%
    66
    34%
    Male
    19
    52.8%
    43
    71.7%
    23
    59%
    43
    72.9%
    128
    66%
    BMI (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2]
    24.3
    (4.6)
    26.0
    (4.6)
    25.6
    (4.0)
    25.3
    (4.2)
    25.4
    (4.4)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Graft Fibrosis (Primary Comparison - ITT Population
    Description Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) is the percentage (%) of participants with an increase >= 1 in IF/TA grade according to Banff (2005 - 2007)according to Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and by treatment groups. Grade I (the better): mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) Grade II : moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (26-50% of cortical area) Grade III (the worse) : severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (>50% of cortical area)
    Time Frame Month 3 (M3) and Month 12 (M12) post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. The primary comparison concerned only the Certican and the Neoral EMT+ groups.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Neoral EMT+
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 26 32
    Participants with an IF/TA grade <= II at M3
    26
    72.2%
    31
    51.7%
    Participants with Fibrosis progression, M3 to M12
    12
    33.3%
    16
    26.7%
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA)
    Description Incidence and severity of IF/TA according to 2005/2007 Banff classification system grades (grades l to lll). IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (>50% of lesions).
    Time Frame M3 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 26 43 32 53
    Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy (IF/TA)
    13
    36.1%
    38
    63.3%
    13
    33.3%
    44
    74.6%
    IF/TA grade at M3 at grade 1
    11
    30.6%
    5
    8.3%
    17
    43.6%
    9
    15.3%
    IFTA grade at M3 at grade II
    2
    5.6%
    0
    0%
    1
    2.6%
    0
    0%
    IF/TA grade at M3 at grade III
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    2.6%
    0
    0%
    IF/TA grade at M12 at grade 0
    9
    25%
    20
    33.3%
    7
    17.9%
    31
    52.5%
    IT/TA grade at M12 at grade I
    8
    22.2%
    18
    30%
    15
    38.5%
    15
    25.4%
    IF/TA grade at M12 at grade II
    6
    16.7%
    5
    8.3%
    9
    23.1%
    6
    10.2%
    IF/TA grade at M12 at grade III
    3
    8.3%
    0
    0%
    1
    2.6%
    1
    1.7%
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) Grade
    Description Difference (M12 - M3) in IF/TA grade. IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (>50% of lesions).
    Time Frame M3 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 26 43 32 53
    Difference in IF/TA grade -1
    5
    13.9%
    1
    1.7%
    7
    17.9%
    2
    3.4%
    Difference in IF/TA grade 0
    9
    25%
    21
    35%
    9
    23.1%
    33
    55.9%
    Difference in IF/TA grade 1
    7
    19.4%
    18
    30%
    11
    28.2%
    13
    22%
    Difference in IF/TA grade 2
    3
    8.3%
    3
    5%
    5
    12.8%
    5
    8.5%
    Difference in IF/TA grade 3
    2
    5.6%
    NA
    NaN
    0
    0%
    NA
    NaN
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Risk Factors of IF/TA Progression
    Description Composite factors regarding fibrosis progression at 12 months using a logistic regression model; the parameters initially considered concerned the demographic characteristics of both recipient and donor, transplantation characteristics, hypertension, diabetes, study treatments, immunosuppression, EMT, IF/TA, function at M3, the onset of acute rejection, the presence of anti-donor antibodies at M12, infections and BK virus viremia. Arteriolar hyaline thickening is thickening of the walls of arterioles by the deposition of homogeneous pink hyaline material. BPAR is biopsy proven acute rejection. TEM progression is the increase ≥ 1 of TEM score between Month 3 and Month 12
    Time Frame M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12.
    Arm/Group Title Yes- Fibrosis Progression No- No Fibrosis Progression
    Arm/Group Description Participants who experienced fibrosis progression based on IF/TA (univariate analysis) Participants who did not experience fibrosis progression based on IF/TA (univariate analysis)
    Measure Participants 67 86
    Donor Sex - Male
    45
    125%
    48
    80%
    Donor Sex - Female
    22
    61.1%
    38
    63.3%
    Donor Age - <=50 years
    28
    77.8%
    48
    80%
    Donor Age - >50 years
    39
    108.3%
    38
    63.3%
    Expanded Criteria donor: NO
    40
    111.1%
    63
    105%
    Expanded Criteria Donor: Yes
    27
    75%
    23
    38.3%
    Delayed graft function: No
    52
    144.4%
    76
    126.7%
    Delayed graft function: Yes
    15
    41.7%
    10
    16.7%
    CC at M3 <50 mL/min/1.73m^2
    40
    111.1%
    35
    58.3%
    CC at M3 >=50 mL/min/1.73m^2 (n=67, 85)
    27
    75%
    50
    83.3%
    Mesangial matrix increase at M3 - 0 (n=64, 85)
    59
    163.9%
    84
    140%
    Mesangial matrix (mm) increase at M3: 1 (n=64, 85)
    2
    5.6%
    1
    1.7%
    Mesangial matrix increase at M3: 2 (n=64, 85)
    3
    8.3%
    0
    0%
    Interstitial fibrosis (ci) at M3: 0 (n=66, 85)
    52
    144.4%
    55
    91.7%
    Interstitial fibrosis (ci) at M3: 1 (n=66, 85)
    14
    38.9%
    27
    45%
    Interstitial fibrosis (ci) at M3: 2 (n=66, 85)
    0
    0%
    3
    5%
    Arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah) at M3: 0
    36
    100%
    56
    93.3%
    Arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah) at M3: 1
    15
    41.7%
    21
    35%
    Arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah) at M3: 2
    10
    27.8%
    8
    13.3%
    Arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah) at M3: 3
    6
    16.7%
    1
    1.7%
    BPAR - No
    55
    152.8%
    79
    131.7%
    BPAR - Yes
    12
    33.3%
    7
    11.7%
    TEM Progression fron M3-M12: No (n=67, 83)
    26
    72.2%
    57
    95%
    TEM Progression fron M3-M12: Yes (n=67, 83)
    41
    113.9%
    26
    43.3%
    TEM Progression fron M3-M12: Missing (n=67, 83)
    0
    0%
    3
    5%
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Percentage of Interstitial Fibrosis (IF) by Numerical Quantification
    Description Percentage of IF measured by numerical quantification. The IF percentage was transposed in grade according to the following rule: grade 0 for an IF % ≤5%, grade I for an IF % ranging from >5% to < 25%, grade II for an IF % ranging from 25 to 50%, grade III for an IF % >50%. Interstitial graft fibrosis has been identified as the primary cause of graft loss following death with a functional graft [3-5].
    Time Frame M3 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 26 43 32 53
    Percentage of IF at M3 (n=26,43,32,53)
    22.8
    (8.9)
    15.9
    (7.5)
    23.4
    (9.5)
    17.8
    (8.2)
    Percentage of IF at M12 (n=24,42,32,53)
    27.6
    (12.2)
    20.9
    (10.1)
    27.4
    (11.5)
    20.4
    (9.1)
    Change in Percentage of IF (n=24,42,32,53)
    5.1
    (12.4)
    4.9
    (12.2)
    3.9
    (12.3)
    2.7
    (9.7)
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Fibrosis Using Numerical Quantification
    Description Comparisons according to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and immunosuppressive treatment
    Time Frame M3 to M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 26 43 32 53
    Fibrosis Progression - No (n=24, 42, 31, 53)
    18
    50%
    30
    50%
    19
    48.7%
    42
    71.2%
    Fibrosis progression - Yes (n=24, 42,31,43)
    6
    16.7%
    12
    20%
    12
    30.8%
    11
    18.6%
    Fibrosis progression - Missing (n=24, 42, 31, 53)
    2
    5.6%
    1
    1.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Status
    Description Incidence and severity of EMT status. EMT status was determined centrally using the graft biopsy taken at 3 months. The result was quickly obtained (within 7 to 15 days) and sent to the company in charge of randomization in order to allocate each patient to a treatment group and to provide the investigator with this information without confirming EMT status.
    Time Frame M3 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 26 43 32 53
    EMT Status at M3-Negative (n=26,43,32,53)
    0
    0%
    43
    71.7%
    0
    0%
    53
    89.8%
    EMT Status at M3- Positive (n=26,43,32,53)
    26
    72.2%
    0
    0%
    32
    82.1%
    0
    0%
    EMT Status at M3 - Not done (n=26,43,32,53)
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    EMT Status at M12- Negative (n=25,41,32,53)
    8
    22.2%
    24
    40%
    9
    23.1%
    36
    61%
    EMT Status at M12- Positive (n=25,41,32,53)
    17
    47.2%
    17
    28.3%
    23
    59%
    17
    28.8%
    EMT Status at M12- Not done (n=25,41,32,53)
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Score
    Description Incidence and severity of EMT score. The intensity of EMT markers expression present and detectable in the renal graft at an early stage following transplantation is known as EMT score. EMT score 0 (the best): <1 EMT score 1 (the better): 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2: 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3: 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): >50% of tubular atrophy
    Time Frame M3 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 26 43 32 53
    EMT Score 0 at M3 (n= 26,43,32, 53)
    0
    (0.49) 0%
    26
    (0.49) 43.3%
    0
    (0.72) 0%
    28
    (0.5) 47.5%
    EMT Score 1 at M3 (n= 26,43,32, 53)
    0
    0%
    17
    28.3%
    0
    0%
    25
    42.4%
    EMT Score 2 at M3 (n= 26,43,32, 53)
    17
    47.2%
    0
    0%
    20
    51.3%
    0
    0%
    EMT Score 3 at M3 (n= 26,43,32, 53)
    9
    25%
    0
    0%
    8
    20.5%
    0
    0%
    EMT Score 4 at M3 (n= 26,43,32, 53)
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    4
    10.3%
    0
    0%
    EMT Score 0 at M12 (n= 25,41,32, 53)
    1
    (1.06) 2.8%
    13
    (1.17) 21.7%
    0
    (1.02) 0%
    19
    (1.03) 32.2%
    EMT Score 1 at M12 (n= 25,41,32, 53)
    7
    19.4%
    11
    18.3%
    9
    23.1%
    17
    28.8%
    EMT Score 2 at M12 (n= 25,41,32, 53)
    10
    27.8%
    11
    18.3%
    10
    25.6%
    12
    20.3%
    EMT Score 3 at M12 (n= 25,41,32, 53)
    4
    11.1%
    4
    6.7%
    9
    23.1%
    4
    6.8%
    EMT Score 4 at M12 (n= 25,41,32, 53)
    3
    8.3%
    2
    3.3%
    4
    10.3%
    1
    1.7%
    EMT Missing Score at M12 (n= 25,41,32, 53)
    1
    2.8%
    2
    3.3%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in EMT Score
    Description Change (M12 - M3) in EMT Score. Progression in EMT score is defined as an increase by >=1 of EMT score from M3 to M12. EMT score 0 (the best): <1 EMT score 1 (the better) : 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2 : 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3 : 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): >50% of tubular atrophy
    Time Frame M3 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 26 43 32 53
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale]
    -0.3
    (1.22)
    0.9
    (1.09)
    -0.3
    (1.05)
    0.6
    (0.99)
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Incidence (Number) of Subclinical Rejections and Borderline Lesions
    Description Incidence of subclinical rejections and borderline lesions with regards to histological evidence of rejection with clinical findings. Subclinical rejections: rejection without clinical symptoms which is diagnosed by chance when a graft biopsy is performed. Clinically suspected BPAR: rejection suspected because of the presence of clinical symptoms (fever, pain, increase of creatinine) and then confirmed by the graft biopsy. Borderline lesions: suspicious for acute T-cell mediated rejection. This category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of tubulitis with minor interstitial infiltration or interstitial infiltration with mild tubulitis.
    Time Frame M3

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican Neoral
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation adn randomization, all patients have received Neoral. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic.
    Measure Participants 69 85
    Subclinical rejections-No (n=68, 84)
    67
    186.1%
    84
    140%
    Subclinical rejections- Yes (n=68, 84)
    1
    2.8%
    0
    0%
    Subclinical rejections- missing (n=68, 84)
    1
    2.8%
    1
    1.7%
    Clinically suspected BPAR - No (N=68, 84)
    68
    188.9%
    84
    140%
    Clinically suspected BPAR - Yes (N=68, 84)
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Clinically suspected BPAR - Missing (N=68, 84)
    1
    2.8%
    1
    1.7%
    Borderline lesions - No (n=68,84)
    62
    172.2%
    71
    118.3%
    Borderline lesions - Yes (n=68,84)
    6
    16.7%
    13
    21.7%
    Borderline lesions - Missing (n=68,84)
    1
    2.8%
    1
    1.7%
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline (M3) in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
    Description eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²). LOCF = Last observation carried forward
    Time Frame M3 (baseline) to M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican Neoral
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 71 87
    without imputation
    6.99
    (1.66)
    2.54
    (1.5)
    imputation by LOCF(96, 97)
    5.96
    (1.39)
    2.15
    (1.37)
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at M12 From Baseline (M3) - ANCOVA Model
    Description The average patient renal function was evaluated on the basis of eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated MDRD formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²).
    Time Frame Baseline (M3), M12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 27 44 34 53
    without imputation
    8.6
    (15.21)
    5.6
    (18.73)
    1.5
    (9.49)
    3.8
    (10.99)
    imputation by LOCF (36, 60, 39, 58)
    -11.9
    (27.78)
    27.3
    (138.44)
    5.1
    (40.80)
    -4.9
    (29.09)
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (Without Imputation)
    Description One of the factors associated with EMT progression between M3 and M12 according to univariate analysis (ITT biopsies M3 & M12).
    Time Frame Month 3 (baseline), Month 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 17 28 19 36
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/mmol]
    44.4
    (188.99)
    3.5
    (48.37)
    16.0
    (41.53)
    29.8
    (189.41)
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Treatment Failures
    Description A treatment failure is defined as biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death or a loss to follow up. It was assessed between randomization and 6 and 12 months post-transplantation.
    Time Frame M6 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 36 60 39 59
    M6: Treatment Failure- No
    33
    91.7%
    52
    86.7%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M6: Treatment Failure- Yes
    3
    8.3%
    8
    13.3%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12: Treatment Failure- No
    29
    80.6%
    42
    70%
    36
    92.3%
    56
    94.9%
    M12: Treatment Failure- Yes
    7
    19.4%
    18
    30%
    3
    7.7%
    3
    5.1%
    M6: BPAR - No
    33
    91.7%
    52
    86.7%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M6: BPAR -Yes
    3
    8.3%
    8
    13.3%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12: BPAR - No
    29
    80.6%
    43
    71.7%
    37
    94.9%
    56
    94.9%
    M12: BPAR - Yes
    7
    19.4%
    17
    28.3%
    2
    5.1%
    3
    5.1%
    M6: Graft Loss - No
    36
    100%
    60
    100%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M6: Graft Loss - Yes
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12: Graft Loss - No
    35
    97.2%
    56
    93.3%
    38
    97.4%
    59
    100%
    M12: Graft Loss - Yes
    1
    2.8%
    4
    6.7%
    1
    2.6%
    0
    0%
    M6: Death - No
    36
    100%
    60
    100%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M6: Death - Yes
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12: Death - No
    36
    100%
    60
    100%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M12: Death - Yes
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M6: Loss to follow-up - No
    36
    100%
    60
    100%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M6: Loss to follow-up - Yes
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12: Loss to follow-up - No
    36
    100%
    59
    98.3%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M12: Loss to follow-up - Yes
    0
    0%
    1
    1.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Type of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
    Description A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation).
    Time Frame M6 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 36 60 39 59
    Cellular AR - No
    30
    83.3%
    46
    76.7%
    38
    97.4%
    58
    98.3%
    Cellular AR - Yes
    6
    16.7%
    14
    23.3%
    1
    2.6%
    1
    1.7%
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Severity of BPAR
    Description A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation).
    Time Frame M6 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 36 60 39 59
    M6: Banff type Grade IA
    0
    0%
    2
    3.3%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M6: Banff type Grade IB
    0
    0%
    4
    6.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M6: Banff type Grade IIA
    1
    2.8%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M6: Banff type Grade IIB
    0
    0%
    1
    1.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M6: Banff type Grade III
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12: Banff type Grade IA
    2
    5.6%
    7
    11.7%
    1
    2.6%
    0
    0%
    M12: Banff type Grade IB
    2
    5.6%
    5
    8.3%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12: Banff type Grade IIA
    1
    2.8%
    1
    1.7%
    0
    0%
    1
    1.7%
    M12: Banff type Grade IIB
    0
    0%
    1
    1.7%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12: Banff type Grade III
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Incidence (Number) of BPAR
    Description A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system.
    Time Frame M6 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 36 60 39 59
    M6 - No
    33
    91.7%
    52
    86.7%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M6 - Yes
    3
    8.3%
    8
    13.3%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12 - No
    29
    80.6%
    43
    71.7%
    37
    94.9%
    56
    94.9%
    M12 - Yes
    7
    19.4%
    17
    28.3%
    2
    5.1%
    3
    5.1%
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Incidence (Number) of Participants With Graft Losses
    Description If a participant underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was considered as the day of graft loss.
    Time Frame M6 and M12 post transplantation

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Certican EMT+ Certican EMT- Neoral EMT+ Neoral EMT-
    Arm/Group Description Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
    Measure Participants 36 60 39 59
    M6 - No
    36
    100%
    60
    100%
    39
    100%
    59
    100%
    M6 - Yes
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    M12 - No
    35
    97.2%
    56
    93.3%
    38
    97.4%
    59
    100%
    M12 - Yes
    1
    2.8%
    4
    6.7%
    1
    2.6%
    0
    0%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Neoral Certican
    Arm/Group Description Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
    All Cause Mortality
    Neoral Certican
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Neoral Certican
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 39/98 (39.8%) 46/96 (47.9%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Agranulocytosis 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Anaemia 1/98 (1%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Febrile neutropenia 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Leukopenia 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Neutropenia 2/98 (2%) 0/96 (0%)
    Pancytopenia 2/98 (2%) 0/96 (0%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute coronary syndrome 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Aphthous stomatitis 1/98 (1%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Colitis 0/98 (0%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Colitis ulcerative 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Dental necrosis 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Diarrhoea 3/98 (3.1%) 3/96 (3.1%)
    Gastritis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Hernial eventration 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Oesophageal ulcer 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Periodontitis 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    General disorders
    Asthenia 1/98 (1%) 1/96 (1%)
    Chills 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    General physical health deterioration 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Hyperthermia 1/98 (1%) 1/96 (1%)
    Oedema peripheral 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Pain 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Pyrexia 5/98 (5.1%) 5/96 (5.2%)
    Sudden death 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Hepatitis 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Immune system disorders
    Amyloidosis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Kidney transplant rejection 0/98 (0%) 4/96 (4.2%)
    Transplant rejection 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Infections and infestations
    Abdominal abscess 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Bacillus infection 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Bacterial pyelonephritis 3/98 (3.1%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Bronchitis 0/98 (0%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Cytomegalovirus infection 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Diarrhoea infectious 0/98 (0%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Escherichia bacteraemia 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Escherichia infection 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Eye infection toxoplasmal 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Gastroenteritis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Gastroenteritis yersinia 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Hepatic cyst infection 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Lung infection 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Orchitis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Pneumonia 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Pseudomonal sepsis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Pyelonephritis 2/98 (2%) 3/96 (3.1%)
    Pyelonephritis acute 1/98 (1%) 3/96 (3.1%)
    Renal cyst infection 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Sinusitis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Staphylococcal infection 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Transplant abscess 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Urinary tract infection 2/98 (2%) 4/96 (4.2%)
    Viral pharyngitis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Accidental overdose 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Arteriovenous fistula site complication 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis 2/98 (2%) 0/96 (0%)
    Graft loss 1/98 (1%) 1/96 (1%)
    Head injury 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Overdose 1/98 (1%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Post procedural haematuria 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Spinal fracture 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Toxicity to various agents 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Ureteric anastomosis complication 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Vascular graft complication 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Investigations
    Blood creatinine increased 3/98 (3.1%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Blood pressure increased 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Weight decreased 0/98 (0%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Diabetes mellitus inadequate control 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Gout 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Hypercreatininaemia 1/98 (1%) 1/96 (1%)
    Hypoglycaemia 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Malnutrition 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Fistula 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Pain in extremity 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Multiple myeloma 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebrovascular accident 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Dizziness 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Headache 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Status epilepticus 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Syncope 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Depression 1/98 (1%) 1/96 (1%)
    Neurosis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Glomerulonephritis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Haematuria 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Hydronephrosis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Proteinuria 1/98 (1%) 1/96 (1%)
    Renal failure acute 4/98 (4.1%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Renal tubular disorder 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Renal tubular necrosis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Vesicoureteric reflux 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Metrorrhagia 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Prostatitis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Dyspnoea 0/98 (0%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Lung disorder 1/98 (1%) 1/96 (1%)
    Pulmonary oedema 0/98 (0%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Respiratory distress 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Capillaritis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Rash maculo-papular 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Hip arthroplasty 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Vascular disorders
    Haematoma 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Haemorrhage 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Iliac artery stenosis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Orthostatic hypotension 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Phlebitis 0/98 (0%) 1/96 (1%)
    Subclavian artery stenosis 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Venous thrombosis limb 1/98 (1%) 0/96 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Neoral Certican
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 59/98 (60.2%) 59/96 (61.5%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 6/98 (6.1%) 7/96 (7.3%)
    Leukopenia 7/98 (7.1%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Neutropenia 6/98 (6.1%) 6/96 (6.3%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Aphthous stomatitis 3/98 (3.1%) 17/96 (17.7%)
    Diarrhoea 3/98 (3.1%) 7/96 (7.3%)
    Gingival hypertrophy 8/98 (8.2%) 0/96 (0%)
    General disorders
    Oedema peripheral 17/98 (17.3%) 14/96 (14.6%)
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis 6/98 (6.1%) 5/96 (5.2%)
    Cytomegalovirus infection 7/98 (7.1%) 2/96 (2.1%)
    Urinary tract infection 5/98 (5.1%) 7/96 (7.3%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Dyslipidaemia 6/98 (6.1%) 9/96 (9.4%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 5/98 (5.1%) 1/96 (1%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Acne 1/98 (1%) 6/96 (6.3%)
    Rash 0/98 (0%) 7/96 (7.3%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 6/98 (6.1%) 5/96 (5.2%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of pooled data (i.e.,data from all sites) in clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Study Director
    Organization Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    Phone 862-778-8300
    Email trialandresults.registries@novartis.com
    Responsible Party:
    Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01079143
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CRAD001AFR10
    • 2009-011473-33
    First Posted:
    Mar 2, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 18, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2014