RICATEM: Reproducibility of Ankle Brachial Index After Maximal Exercise

Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01801579
Collaborator
Institut de formation en éducation physique et en sport d'Angers/Les Ponts de Cé (Other)
15
1
17
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Hemodynamic changes in the lower limbs are very important and rapid after maximal exercise. The automatic method allows a fastest measurement of the Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI). Thus, it appears important to know whether automatic assessment of ABI is as reliable and reproducible as the manual method.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Two methods are mainly used to determine the blood pressure at rest, in a non-invasive way, in order to calculate the Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI). The first method, using a manual sphygmomanometer coupled with a Doppler probe, is considered as the reference method. The second method requires at least one automatic sphygmomanometer. Data from the literature show that these two methods are reproducible to assess ABI at rest. Some authors have reported a better reproducibility of measurements with automatic tool. Others consider that the current accuracy of automatic measurement is insufficient to replace the reference method Doppler. Thus, the aime of the present study is to evaluate whether automatic assessment of ABI is as reliable and reproducible as the manual method.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    15 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Reproducibility of the Ankle-Brachial Index Measurements After a Maximal Exercise
    Study Start Date :
    Nov 1, 2012
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Apr 1, 2014
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Apr 1, 2014

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Test-retest difference in ankle to brachial pressure index [up to 2 week]

      Comparison of differendces observed on test-retest measures with manual and automatic measurements

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Duration of recordings. [up to 2 weeks]

      Comaprison of the time needed to complete the recording with automatic vs. manual techniques

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 40 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Participant between 18 and 40 years old

    • Informed consent signed

    • Exclusion Criteria:

    • Do not want to participate to the protocol

    • Pregnant woman

    • Adults to enhanced protection, deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative authority, without consent hospitalized or admitted to a health facility or social purposes other than research

    • Being in a period of exclusion from another biomedical study

    • Amputee or with a member dysgenesis

    • Not allowed to perform a maximal exercise

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University Hospital Angers France 49933

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Hospital, Angers
    • Institut de formation en éducation physique et en sport d'Angers/Les Ponts de Cé

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Antoine BRUNEAU, MD, University Hospital, Angers

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University Hospital, Angers
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01801579
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2012-A01036-37
    First Posted:
    Mar 1, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 12, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Keywords provided by University Hospital, Angers

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 12, 2016