The RESBIOP-study: Resection Versus Biopsy in High-grade Glioma Patients (ENCRAM 2202)

Sponsor
Jasper Gerritsen (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06146725
Collaborator
Haaglanden Medical Centre (Other), Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven (Other), University Hospital Heidelberg (Other), Technical University of Munich (Other), Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern (Other), Massachusetts General Hospital (Other), University of California, San Francisco (Other)
564
8
72
70.5
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

There are no guidelines or prospective studies defining the optimal surgical treatment for gliomas of older patients (≥70 years) or those with limited functioning performance at presentation (KPS ≤70). Therefore, the decision between resection and biopsy is varied, amongst neurosurgeons internationally and at times even within an instiutition. This study aims to compare the effects of maximal tumor resection versus tissue biopsy on survival, functional, neurological, and quality of life outcomes in these patient subgroups. Furthermore, it evaluates which modality would maximize the potential to undergo adjuvant treatment.

This study is an international, multicenter, prospective, 2-arm cohort study of observational nature. Consecutive HGG patients will be treated with resection or biopsy at a 3:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS) and 2) proportion of patients that have received adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints are 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery 2) progression-free survival (PFS); 3) quality of life at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). Total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Tumor resection
  • Procedure: Tumor biopsy

Detailed Description

Trial design This is an international, multicenter, prospective, observational, 2-arm cohort study (registration: clinicaltrials.gov ID number TBA). Eligible patients are treated with either resection or biopsy with a 3:1 ratio with a sequential computer-generated random number as subject ID.

Study objectives The primary study objective is to evaluate safety and efficacy of resection versus biopsy in HGG patients as measured by overall survival (OS) and receipt of adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Secondary study objectives are to evaluate postoperative neurological morbidity, progression-free survival (PFS), postoperative quality of life and SAEs after resection or biopsy as measured by NIHSS deteriration, tumor progression on MRI scans, quality of life questionnaires (QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20, EQ 5D), and recording SAEs respectively.

Study setting and participants Patients will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.

Study patients are allocated to either the supramaximal or maximum safe resection group and will undergo evaluation at presentation (baseline) and during the follow-up period at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Motor function will be evaluated using the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) scale. Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Patient functioning with be assessed with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification system. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be assessed with the EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20 and EQ 5D questionnaires. Overall survival and progression-free survival will be assessed at 12 months postoperatively. We expect to complete patient inclusion in 4 years. The estimated duration of the study (including follow-up) will be 5 years.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
564 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
The RESBIOP-study: Resection Versus Biopsy in High-grade Glioma Patients (ENCRAM 2202)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2028
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2029

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Tumor resection

Tumor resection

Procedure: Tumor resection
Maximal safe resection of the tumor

Tumor biopsy

Tumor biopsy

Procedure: Tumor biopsy
Biopsy of the tumor

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall survival [Up to 5 years postoperatively]

    Time from diagnosis to death from any cause

  2. Adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy [6 months postoperatively]

    Proportion of patients that have received adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Progression-free survival [Up to 5 years postoperatively]

    Time from diagnosis to disease progression (occurrence of a new tumor lesions with a volume greater than 0.175 cm3, or an increase in residual tumor volume of more than 25%) or death, whichever comes first

  2. Neurological morbidity at 6 weeks [6 weeks postoperatively]

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 weeks after surgery

  3. Neurological morbidity at 3 months [3 months postoperatively]

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 3 months after surgery

  4. Neurological morbidity at 6 months [6 months postoperatively]

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 months after surgery

  5. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ C30) [6 weeks postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  6. Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ C30) [3 months postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  7. Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ C30) [6 months postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

  8. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ BN20) [6 weeks postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  9. Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ BN20) [3 months postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  10. Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ BN20) [6 months postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

  11. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EQ-5D) [6 weeks postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

  12. Quality of life at 3 months (EQ-5D) [3 months postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

  13. Quality of life at 6 months (EQ-5D) [6 months postoperatively]

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

  14. Serious Adverse Events [6 weeks postoperatively]

    Serious Adverse Events within 6 weeks postoperatively

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years

  2. Tumor diagnosed as HGG (WHO grade III/IV) on MRI as assessed by the neurosurgeon

  3. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem or midline

  2. Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g. pacemaker)

  3. Inability to give written informed consent

  4. Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma

  5. Second primary malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of any organ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94143
2 Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts United States 02114
3 University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium
4 Technical University Munich Munich Bavaria Germany 74076
5 University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
6 Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam Zuid-Holland Netherlands 3015 GD
7 Haaglanden Medical Center The Hague Netherlands
8 Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern Bern Switzerland 3010

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Jasper Gerritsen
  • Haaglanden Medical Centre
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
  • University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of California, San Francisco

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jasper Gerritsen, Jasper K.W. Gerritsen MD PhD, Erasmus Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06146725
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MEC-2020-0812-3
First Posted:
Nov 27, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Nov 27, 2023
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Jasper Gerritsen, Jasper K.W. Gerritsen MD PhD, Erasmus Medical Center
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 27, 2023