MIKA: Research of the Consequences on the Digestive Tract Following the Proposed Treatments for a Urinary Infection in Children

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03825874
Collaborator
(none)
200
20
47.4
10
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (E-ESBL) is a major public health problem. It leads more frequent prescription of penems with the risk of emergence and spread of strains producing carbapenemases, which may be resistant to all known antibiotics. A policy of savings of penems is desirable. Among the alternatives to penems, amikacin is in the foreground. It remains active on the majority of E-ESBL strains. Some risk factors for E-ESBL emergence are known: recent antibiotic therapy (particularly quinolones and cephalosporins third generation), previous hospitalization or residence in a high endemic country.

In pediatrics, E-ESBLs are primarily responsible for urinary tract infection. In France, E-ESBLs represent about 10% of the strains responsible for urinary tract infections. The Pathology Group Pediatric Infectious (GPIP) of the French Society of Pediatrics (SFP) and the Society of Infectious Pathology French Language (SPILF) have proposed different therapeutic options to treat febrile UTIs in children: amikacin intravenous; intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone or intramuscular (IM); or cefixime per-os (PO).

The objective of this study is to compare the emergence of E-ESBLs in stools of children after febrile UTIs treatment with amikacin IV versus ceftriaxone or cefixime.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Amikacin
  • Other: usual antibiotic treatment

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Observational Model:
Other
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Comparison of the Impact on Digestive Portage of Broad Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (E-ESBLs) of Proposed Treatments in Outbreaks of Childhood Urinary Tract Infection
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 18, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
amikacin IV

Febrile urinary tract infection treated with amikacin IV

Other: Amikacin
A first anorectal swab will be performed before starting any antibiotic treatment Three to four days after the start of antibiotic treatment, patients will be seen again and a new anorectal swab will be performed.

Other antibiotics

Febrile urinary tract infection treated with other antibiotic, according to the recommendations: ceftriaxone or cefixime

Other: usual antibiotic treatment
A first anorectal swab will be performed before starting any antibiotic treatment Three to four days after the start of antibiotic treatment, patients will be seen again and a new anorectal swab will be performed.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Presence of E-BLSE in stools [day 4]

    ano-rectal swab

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Type of E-BLSE strain in stools [day 4]

  2. Rate of enzymatic resistance of E-BLSE strain in stools [4 days]

  3. Fever [4 days]

    Time of apyrexia

  4. side effects due to antibiotic therapy [at 1.5 months]

  5. rate of relapse of urinary tract infection [1.5 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
3 Months to 3 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Infant and child (age ≥ 3 months and <3 years)

  • Patient treated for febrile urinary tract infection as monotherapy with amikacin IV, ceftriaxone (IV or IM) or cefixime PO *

  • Whose parents read and understood the newsletter and whose express consent was collected

  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme (Social Security or Universal Medical Coverage)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Child treated with more than one antibiotic (eg treatment with dual therapy ceftriaxone / cefotaxime and aminoglycoside)

  • Antibiotherapy in progress or discontinued in the previous 7 days

  • Hospitalized child

  • Refusal of one of the parents

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Antoine Beclère Hospital Clamart Ile-de France France
2 Jean Verdier Hospital Bondy Ile-de-France France
3 André Mignot Hospital Le Chesnay Ile-de-France France
4 Cabinet du Dr Benali Charenton-le-Pont France 94220
5 Cabinet du Dr Coicadan Chennevières-sur-Marne France 94430
6 Cabinet du Dr Corrard Combs-la-Ville France 77380
7 Cabinet du Dr Thollot Essey-lès-Nancy France 54270
8 CHU Le Kremlin-Bicêtre Le Kremlin-Bicêtre France
9 157 Avenue du Général Leclerc Maisons-Alfort France 94700
10 Centre Hospitalier de Meaux Meaux France
11 Cabinet du Dr Deberdt Nogent-sur-Marne France 94130
12 Cabinet du Dr Wollner Nogent-sur-Marne France 94130
13 Cabinet du Dr Romain Paris France 75015
14 Cabinet du Dr Turberg-Romain Paris France 75015
15 Cabinet du Dr Michot Paris France 75016
16 Hospital Robert-Debré Paris France
17 Cabinet du Dr Cohen Saint-Maur-des-Fossés France 94100
18 Cabinet du Dr Werner Villeneuve-lès-Avignon France 30400
19 CHI Villeneuve-Saint-Georges Villeneuve-Saint-Georges France 94195
20 13 Villa Beauséjour Vincennes France 94300

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fouad MADHI, MD, CHI Créteil

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03825874
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MIKA
  • 2017-A02372-51
First Posted:
Jan 31, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Nov 19, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 19, 2021