Hepatectomy Versus Chemoembolization for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria

Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02138981
Collaborator
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (Other), Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (Other), Kaiping Central Hospital (Other), First People's Hospital of Chenzhou (Other), Dongguan Shi People's Hospital (Other)
436
1
2
75
5.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the survival outcomes between hepatic resection and transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) used as the initial treatment in patients with Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection
  • Procedure: Immediate Resection
Phase 4

Detailed Description

For patients with large/multiple, and resectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, the choice of treatment remains largely controversial. For these patients, transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as a palliative therapy.

On the other hand, many authors still believe that hepatic resection is the only potential curative treatment in these patients because it is still feasible to remove all macroscopic tumors safely at surgery. With advances in surgical techniques, more large/multiple HCCs are now resectable, and long-term results have been reported that ranged from 30% to 58% at 5 years; even patients with large bilobar multiple HCC could reach a survival rate of more than 20% at 5 years after hepatic resection.

Until now, there have been only a few studies that compared the outcomes of hepatic resection and TACE in the treatment of multiple HCCs, and these have reported controversial results. Some studies showed that hepatic resection had survival benefi t over TACE, but other studies showed the opposite result ( 11-15 ). Therefore, the investigators performed this prospective study in consecutive patients with large/multiple, and resectable HCCs to compare the outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection or TACE as the initial treatment.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
436 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Hepatic Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization as the Initial Treatment for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Immediate Resection

patients received immediate surgical hepatic resection

Procedure: Immediate Resection
patients received immediate surgical resection.

Experimental: Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection

patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatments, and only patients who showed good response were subjected to surgical resection.

Procedure: Chemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection
patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatments, and only patients who showed good response were subjected to surgical resection.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. overall survival time [5 years]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. disease free survival [5 years]

  2. Number of Adverse Events [30 days]

    All severe adverse events for the entire course of treatment, including treatment for primary tumor and recurrent tumor.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • A diagnosis of HCC based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).

  • The patient has not been previously treated with surgery, radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection, or cryoablation.

  • The tumor beyound milan criteria.

  • The tumor was evaluated to be resectable by a same group of surgeon.

  • Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured according to EASL criteria

  • No serious concurrent medical illness

  • Not pregnant or breast-feeding patients

  • Cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only

  • The following laboratory parameters:

  • Platelet count ≥ 80,000/µL

  • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL

  • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL Serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L

  • ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal

  • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal

  • INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits

  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3

  • Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Tumor vascular invasion or distant metastases

  • Significant renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/minute) or patients on dialysis

  • On anticoagulation or suffering from a known bleeding disorder

  • Unstable coronary artery disease or recent MI

  • Known history of HIV

  • History of organ allograft

  • Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.

  • Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy

  • Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.

  • Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event > CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug

  • Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture

  • Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease

  • severe Arterioportal Shunts or Arteriavein Shunts

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Cancer Center Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China 510060

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sun Yat-sen University
  • First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Kaiping Central Hospital
  • First People's Hospital of Chenzhou
  • Dongguan Shi People's Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ming Shi, MD, Sun Yat-sen University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Shi Ming, Professor, Sun Yat-sen University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02138981
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HCC_S012
First Posted:
May 15, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Aug 2, 2018
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2018
Keywords provided by Shi Ming, Professor, Sun Yat-sen University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 2, 2018