EUSPACT: EUS vs. MDCT in Pancreatic Malignancy

Sponsor
Clinical Hospital Colentina (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02115022
Collaborator
University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova (Other), Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Other), Institutul Clinic Fundeni (Other)
45
5
43.1
9
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Accurate staging of patients with pancreatic cancer is critical to avoid the expense, morbidity, and mortality related to unnecessary surgery. While several tests are available for assessing such patients, consensus has not been achieved on the optimal approach. As a matter of fact, pancreatic cancer staging is discussed controversially due to conflicting evidence and certainly EUS has lost grounds due to improvements in CT technology. Thus, the role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA varies among treatment centers.

The present study is designed to better define the role of EUS in predicting resectability, as compared to high resolution cross-sectional imaging.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Registry procedures:
    • HIGH-RESOLUTION PANCREATIC PROTOCOL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) SCAN EXAMINATION: performed on at least 16-section multi-detector row (MD) CT and reviewed using multi-planar reconstructions, with images obtained following the oral administration of water and pancreatic protocol intravenous iopamidol, with images acquired in the pancreatic and portal venous phases of contrast enhancement, reconstructed as thin slice (at 1 mm - pancreatic phase or 2 mm - portal venous phase increments).

    • EUS EXAMINATION: performed within 2 weeks of the MDCT, aiming visualization of the pancreas, main surrounding vascular structures, celiac and mediastinal lymph nodes, liver and left adrenal gland, with EUS-FNA performed at the discretion of the investigator/examiner to confirm/exclude metastases and for the confirmation of malignancy in the primary tumor. Patients confirmed by EUS as having distant metastases are to be deferred from the planned surgical intervention.

    • SURGICAL INTERVENTION: aiming to provide curative intent (R0) resection.

    • HISTOPATHOLOGICAL POSTOPERATIVE STAGING: with evaluation of loco-regional invasiveness and degree of complete surgical resection (R0/R1).

    • FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS: with phone-calls on an every 6 month basis, for up to 2 years, retaining the following data: survival (or not), date of decease and its direct cause (if applicable), the presence of tumor recurrence (or not).

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational [Patient Registry]
    Actual Enrollment :
    45 participants
    Observational Model:
    Case-Only
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Endoscopic UltraSound in Potentially Resectable PAncreatic Malignancy - Does it Bear the Weight of the Rapidly Evolving Technology of Computer Tomography?
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Jul 1, 2014
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Jan 1, 2018
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Feb 1, 2018

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    Potentially resectable pancreatic cancer

    Patients with a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT), fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Staging capability of each study procedure [Up to 2 weeks, depending on the time of the surgical intervention]

      Each imaging test (MDCT and EUS) and findings at or after surgery are to be judged on their ability to provide descriptions of the primary tumor's size, location, relationship to vessels - using the terms abutment (≤180º of contact) and encasement (>180º of contact), vessel occlusion, variant vascular anatomy, a grade regarding local tumor resectability (resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced; R0 or R1 resection), and extent and location of extrapancreatic disease.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Side-effects related to the EUS examination [Monitored for 24 hours after EUS]

      Each patient will be monitored for 24 hours after the EUS examination to identify possible early complications of the procedure

    2. Patient survival time, and tumor recurrence-free survival [Up to 2 years]

      Each patient is going to be followed-up for up to 2 years after the surgical intervention an an every-6 month basis, in order to identify events such as death or tumor recurrence.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients;

    • the presence of a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT);

    • patients fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent;

    • sign of the informed consent.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • the presence of significant co-morbidities that contraindicate pancreatic resection;

    • previous neo-adjuvant oncologic therapy;

    • distant metastases;

    • lack of discernment;

    • refusal to sign the informed consent..

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Research Center in Gastroenterogy and Hepatology Craiova Dolj Romania 200638
    2 University Military Hospital Bucharest Romania 010825
    3 Gastroenterology Department, Clinical Hospital Colentina Bucharest Romania 020125
    4 Fundeni Clinical Institute Bucharest Romania
    5 Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine Cluj Napoca Romania

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Clinical Hospital Colentina
    • University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova
    • Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
    • Institutul Clinic Fundeni

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Mihai Rimbas, MD, PhD, Clinical Hospital Colentina, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
    • Study Chair: Cristian R Baicus, Professor, Clinical Hospital Colentina, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
    • Study Director: Adrian Saftoiu, Professor, Craiova research Center in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Craiova University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Mihai Rimbas, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Clinical Hospital Colentina
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02115022
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Col-gastro 5
    First Posted:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 28, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2020
    Keywords provided by Mihai Rimbas, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Clinical Hospital Colentina
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 28, 2020