Video Feedback Versus Verbal Feedback

Sponsor
University of New Mexico (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02948595
Collaborator
(none)
19
2
5.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The long term goal of our research is to develop a curriculum for Obstetrics and Gynecology resident physicians that regularly employs use of video assessment to improve surgical skills. Regular use of video feedback may enable improved self-assessment and allow for formal documentation of proficiency. The overall objective is to compare the use of video feedback to use of structured verbal feedback in the simulated task of laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Video feedback followed by structured verbal feedback
  • Other: Structured verbal feedback followed by video feedback
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
19 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Video Feedback Versus Verbal Feedback in Simulated Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Closure
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 18, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 3, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 3, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Video feedback then verbal feedback

Video feedback followed by structured verbal feedback

Other: Video feedback followed by structured verbal feedback
Video feedback followed by structured verbal feedback

Experimental: Verbal feedback then video feedback

Structured verbal feedback followed by video feedback

Other: Structured verbal feedback followed by video feedback
Structured verbal feedback followed by video feedback

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Improvement in ob/gyn resident physician self-efficacy as measured by self-efficacy questionnaire in video versus verbal feedback for simulated laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure [up to 18 months]

    Resident physicians will report their self-efficacy in completion of simulated laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure using an adaptation of a previously validated self-efficacy questionnaire. Their self-efficacy will be compared after completion of the task incorporating verbal feedback from a proctor to completion of the task incorporating review of video feedback provided by proctor.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Improvement in time of simulated laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure with video versus verbal feedback [up to 18 months]

    Resident physicians will be timed (in minutes) for completion of simulated laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure. Time will be compared in completion of the task after verbal feedback from a proctor versus completion of task after video feedback from a proctor.

  2. Improvement in skill of simulated laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure as measured by Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale with video versus verbal feedback [up to 18 months]

    Two advanced gynecologic laparoscopists will review the films of the tasks for each resident physician. They will rate level of skill for each participant based on Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale. The reviews will generate two scores for each participant: the score for the task completed after the resident receives verbal feedback and the score for the task completed after the resident receives video feedback. The two scores will then be compared for each participant.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Resident Physician in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Not a resident physician in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of New Mexico

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Naomi Y Swanson, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02948595
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 16-096
First Posted:
Oct 28, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Sep 19, 2019
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 19, 2019