Solid State vs. Balloon Esophageal Catheter for Estimation of Pleural Pressure

Sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05817968
Collaborator
Pulmotech B.V. (Other)
16
1
9.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Measurements of esophageal pressure (Pes) as surrogate for pleural pressure are routinely performed in selected ICU patients to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and assess breathing effort. Pes is clinically measured via a nasogastric esophageal catheter. Current techniques involve balloon catheters but have some important disadvantages as they could deflate over time and require a very precise positioning and filling volume. A solid-state sensor does not have disadvantages associated with balloon catheters and may therefore be a useful alternative in clinical practice.

This method-comparison study in adult mechanically ventilated ICU patients evaluates the accuracy of Pes measured using an esophageal catheter with a solid-state sensor as compared to a balloon catheter as reference standard.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: intelligent Esophageal Pressure Catheter (iEPC)
N/A

Detailed Description

Measurements of esophageal pressure (Pes) as surrogate for pleural pressure are routinely performed in selected ICU patients to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and assess breathing effort. Pes is clinically measured via a nasogastric esophageal catheter. Current techniques involve balloon catheters but have some important disadvantages as they could deflate over time and require a very precise positioning and filling volume. A solid state sensor does not have disadvantages associated with balloon catheters and may therefore be a useful alternative in clinical practice.

This method-comparison study in adult mechanically ventilated ICU patients evaluates the accuracy of Pes measured using an esophageal catheter with a solid-state sensor as compared to a balloon catheter as reference standard.

Subjects will receive a standard balloon esophageal catheter and a solid-state pressure catheter for simultaneous measurements of Pes. Study population will be post-surgical ICU patients. Measurements will be performed during clinical mechanical ventilation settings which include a first phase of passive controlled ventilation (patient is still sedated after surgery) as well a phase of partially-assisted ventilation where the patient's breathing effort has resumed and is assisted by the ventilator. During both phases, 10-15 minutes of tidal breathing will be recorded.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
16 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Method comparison study; participants serve as their own controlMethod comparison study; participants serve as their own control
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Comparison of a Solid State Versus Balloon Esophageal Catheter for Estimation of Pleural Pressure in Surgical ICU Patients
Anticipated Study Start Date :
May 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Esophageal manometry using a solid state sensor vs. balloon catheter

Placement of both a solid state and balloon esophageal pressure (Pes) catheter. Pes recordings of these catheters will be acquired simultaneously during both controlled mechanical ventilation and assisted mechanical ventilation, for 10-15 minutes per phase. Ventilator settings/protocol will be as per standard-of-care.

Device: intelligent Esophageal Pressure Catheter (iEPC)
Placement of the iEPC nasogastric catheter with solid state sensor for esophageal manometry. Comparator: Esophageal balloon catheter (NutriVent).
Other Names:
  • Solid state esophageal pressure catheter, PulmoTech B.V.
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Difference in absolute Pes-derived parameters obtained by solid state catheter vs. balloon catheter. [30 minutes]

      Absolute Pes value (in cmH2O) at end-expiration and at peak inspiration (based on flow recordings) will be recorded.

    2. Difference in relative Pes-derived parameters obtained by solid state catheter vs. balloon catheter. [30 minutes]

      Relative Pes value (cmH2O) will be measured as the inspiratory amplitude in Pes.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Signed informed consent

    • Patient requiring mechanical ventilation at the ICU following cardiothoracic or abdominal surgery

    • Age ≥ 18 year

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Pregnancy

    • Upper airway/esophageal/mouth or face pathology (i.e. recent surgery, esophageal varices, diaphragmatic hernia)

    • Nasal bleeding within the last <2 weeks

    • Presence of pneumothorax

    • Use of anticoagulants that increase the risk of catheter insertion

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Erasmus Medical Center
    • Pulmotech B.V.

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Annemijn Jonkman, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center
    • Study Director: Leo Heunks, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Annemijn Jonkman, Assistant Professor, Erasmus Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05817968
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • MEC-2023-0119
    First Posted:
    Apr 18, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 18, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Annemijn Jonkman, Assistant Professor, Erasmus Medical Center
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 18, 2023