Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury

Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03978845
Collaborator
(none)
10
1
1
15.9
0.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this single-centered, proof of concept study is to determine whether it is feasible to perform a phrenic nerve block to reduce diaphragm electrical activity and, therefore, inspiratory effort and if such block reduces self-inflicted lung injury on patients under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing. Ten patients will be monitored with electrical impedance tomography, NAVA catheter, and esophageal balloon. Using a nerve stimulator and an ultrasound, we will identify the phrenic nerve on its cervical portion bilaterally and administer perineural low-dose lidocaine. Diaphragm electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and data on ventilation distribution will be continuously collected. The study will be over once the patient presents the same diaphragm electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

The use of protective mechanical ventilation has improved prognosis on patients with Acute Respiratory Failure. The association of neuromuscular blockade in the first 48-72h has additionally contributed to a higher survival rate. Such improvement may be due to the reduction of transpulmonary pressures caused by the patient's inspiratory effort. To achieve appropriate neuromuscular blockade, highes doses of both neuromuscular blocking agents and sedatives are required. Therefore, such a strategy usually causes muscular atrophy, including the diaphragm.

Because of the augmented neural drive of such patients, exacerbated by inflammation and pulmonary edema, the consequent high tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure cannot be reduced by the newest sedatives. In fact, some of these sedatives may even deteriorate ventilatory dyssynchrony. Our intention is to verify a novel approach: whether is possible to reduce the inspiratory effort of patients without the use of systemic neuromuscular blocking agents.

Our objective in this proof of concept study is to determine the feasibility the use of phrenic nerve blockade to decrease transpulmonary pressure and tidal volume, as well as quantify its effects on esophageal pressure, diaphragmatic electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and ventilation distribution in patients on spontaneous breathing. It is expected that such intervention will reduce diaphragm electrical activity, leading to lower transpulmonary pressure, tidal volume and driving pressures.

All patients will be submitted to the same intervention. Respiratory mechanics, ventilation distribution, diaphragm electrical activity, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and peripheral saturation will be collected throughout the study. Once the patient presents the same diaphragmatic electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block, the study will be over.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
All patients will be submitted to the same procedures. There will be no between-group comparisons.All patients will be submitted to the same procedures. There will be no between-group comparisons.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Feasibility of Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury in ARF Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation on Spontaneous Breathing
Actual Study Start Date :
May 15, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 9, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Phrenic Nerve Blockade

All patients will be submitted to bilateral phrenic nerve block on its cervical portion.

Drug: Lidocaine
Using an ultrasound and a nerve stimulator, the phrenic nerve will be identified and low-dose lidocaine will be administered perineurally.
Other Names:
  • Local anesthetic
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Reduction of tidal volume or transpulmonary pressure [20 minutes]

      Tidal volume or transpulmonary pressure measured using EIT, Servo-I and an esophageal balloon

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Reduction of the inspiratory effort [20 minutes - 3 hours]

      Diaphragm electrical activity using NAVA

    2. Consequences on mechanical ventilation [20 minutes - 3 hours]

      Tidal volume, pendellfut and asynchronies measured by EIT

    3. Time to complete weaning of the blockade [30 minutes - 3 hours]

      Patients will be monitored until full recover of inspiratory effort or diaphragm electrical activity

    4. Reduction of the inspiratory effort [20 minutes - 3 hours]

      Esophageal pressure using an esophageal catheter

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age > 17 years-old;

    • Under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing, capable of triggering the ventilator with P/F < 300;

    • Tidal volume > 10ml/kg with inspiratory pressure of 12 cmH2O OR driving pressure > 15 cm H2O with inspiratory pressure of 12 cmH2O

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Use of neuromuscular blocking agents less than 3h;

    • Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) > 0;

    • Arterial pH < 7.25;

    • Hemodynamically unstable or with increasing doses of vasopressors in the last 2h;

    • Intracranial hypertension;

    • Thoracic or abdominal tubes;

    • Any neuromuscular disease;

    • Spinal injury;

    • Ascitis;

    • Thoracic burn injury;

    • Tetanus;

    • Pregnancy.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hospital das Clínicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo São Paulo Brazil 01246-903

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Joaquim E Vieira, MD, PhD, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine
    • Principal Investigator: Marcelo BP Amato, MD, PhD, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03978845
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CAAE 02029118.2.0000.00.68
    First Posted:
    Jun 7, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 30, 2020
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2019
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 30, 2020