Pain During Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Sub-tenon Anesthesia
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Vitreoretinal surgery has evolved to less invasive procedures, and it is used to treat a wide range of diseases. So anesthesia for vitreoretinal procedures has evolved, promoting adequate analgesia while reducing risks to the patient. In the present study two types of procedures for anesthesia during vitreoretinal surgery are evaluated regarding the pain referred by the patient during the whole procedure: peribulbar anesthesia versus sub-tenon injection plus topical jelly anesthesia. Through the comparative analysis of the pain scale of the two groups it is expected that the two modalities present the same anesthetic efficacy, showing that the methods used may be equivalent.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group 1- Sub-tenon plus lidocaine jelly Patients are going to be submitted to lidocaine 2% jelly topical anesthesia for 5 minutes then to sub-tenon injection of 2-4 ml of ropivacaine 10% previous to 23 G pars plana vitrectomy. |
Procedure: Topical lidocaine 2% jelly plus sub-tenon ropivacaine 10% injection
Lidocaine 2% jelly applied to conjunctival fornices for 5 minutes then injection of 2-4 ml of ropivacaine 10% in the sub-tenon space with a blunt cannula through a temporal inferior incision
|
Active Comparator: Group 2- peribulbar Patients are going to be submitted to peribulbar injection of 4-6 ml of ropivacaine 10% previous to 23 G pars plana vitrectomy. |
Procedure: Peribulbar injection
Peribulbar injection of 4-6 ml of ropivacaine 10%
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Pain score [Once 30 minutes after the end of the vitrectomy surgery]
Pain score referred by the patient measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of ruler with 100 cm in length and scale from 0 to 100, where the numbers of this one are visible only in the side of the examiner. It is constructed from a metal ruler with a total length of one meter, supported by two transparent acrylic side supports and a sliding and movable metal weight on the metallic part of the ruler. Before the measurement of pain, the examiner will explain to the patients the functioning of the VAS. Each patient will be encouraged to pass the marker along the scale, with the help of the examiner. It will be made clear to him that point "0" is the point of the scale which represented "no pain", what is considered the better outcome, and point "100" corresponded to the most intense pain he could feel. The patient will be asked about: Intraoperative pain - the intensity of pain throughout the procedure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Surgical complications [Once At the end of vitrectomy surgery]
Surgical complications referred by the surgeon during vitrectomy
Other Outcome Measures
- Duration of surgery [Once At the end of vitrectomy surgery]
Duration of vitrectomy in minutes
- Anesthetic medications [Once during the vitrectomy surgery]
Other anesthetic medication for controlling pain administered during the study
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients that have the diagnosis of epiretinal membrane, macular hole, complication of diabetic retinopathy such as vitreous hemorrhage or traction retinal detachment or other vitreomacular diseases that require treatment by pars plana vitrectomy.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Previous pars plana vitrectomy in the studied eye.
-
Previous scleral buckle surgery
-
Uncontrolled arterial hypertension
-
Any ocular surgery performed in the studied eye in the previous three months
-
Medical or psychological condition that preclude study adherence
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | School of Medicine - Clinical Hospital | Ribeirao Preto | SP | Brazil | 14049-900 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Sao Paulo
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jefferson AS Ribeiro, PhD, University of Sao Paulo
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Rao GP, Wong D, Groenewald C, McGalliard JN, Jones A, Ridges PJ. Local anaesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery: a case-control study of 200 cases. Eye (Lond). 1998;12 ( Pt 3a):407-11.
- Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976 Nov;31(9):1191-8.
- Roman SJ, Chong Sit DA, Boureau CM, Auclin FX, Ullern MM. Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia: an efficient and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Aug;81(8):673-6.
- Sousa FAEF, Silva JA. Avaliação e mensuração da dor em contextos clínicos e de pesquisa. Rev. Dor, 2004;5(4):408-429.
- Spaeth G. Ophthalmic Surgery, Principles and Practice. Third Edition. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2003.
- Stevens JD, Foss AJ, Hamilton AM. No-needle one-quadrant sub-tenon anaesthesia for panretinal photocoagulation. Eye (Lond). 1993;7 ( Pt 6):768-71.
- Tang S, Lai P, Lai M, Zou Y, Li J, Li S. Topical anesthesia in transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy for macular-based disorders. Ophthalmologica. 2007;221(1):65-8.
- ST anesthesia for PPV