GALILEO: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To determine the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye injected into the eye on vision function in subjects with macular edema as a consequence of central retinal vein occlusion
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Biological: Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321)
Intravitreal injection. Weeks 0 to 20 of Aflibercept Injection every 4 weeks; Weeks 24 to 52 every 4 weeks PRN (pro re nata, on demand); plus additional on Week 60 and 68.
Other: Sham treatment
Sham treatment. Weeks 0 to 52 sham treatment every 4 weeks; plus additional on Week 60 and 68.
|
Sham Comparator: Sham treatment Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Other: Sham treatment
Sham treatment. Weeks 0 to 52 sham treatment every 4 weeks; plus additional on Week 60 and 68.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score Compared With Baseline at Week 24 With Discontinued Participants Before Week 24 Evaluated as Failures [Baseline and Week 24]
Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 24 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in BCVA as Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 24 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) [Baseline and Week 24]
Defined study baseline range of ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 24 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. However, because this was assessed at the screening visit, subjects may have had a higher BCVA recorded at the baseline visit and would not have been excluded from the study.
- Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline and Week 24]
- Percentage of Participants Who Developed Neovascularization During the First 24 Weeks [From baseline until Week 24]
Formation of blood vessels in the anterior segment, optic disc, or elsewhere in the fundus up to Week 24
- Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Total Score at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline and Week 24]
The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales which are all scored from 0-100. To reach the overall composite score, each sub-scale score is averaged in order to give each sub-scale equal weight
- Change From Baseline in European Five-dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D) Score at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline and Week 24]
EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire based on a scale from -0.594 (worst) to 1.00 (best).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Center-involved macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) for no longer than 9 months with mean central subfield thickness ≥ 250 μm on optical coherence tomography (OCT)
-
Adults ≥ 18 years
-
Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 to 20/320 (73 to 24 letters) in the study eye
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Any prior treatment with anti-VEGF agents in the study eye (Pegaptanib sodium, anecortave acetate, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, etc.) or previous administration of systemic anti-angiogenic medications
-
Prior panretinal laser photocoagulation or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye
-
CRVO disease duration > 9 months from date of diagnosis
-
Previous use of intraocular corticosteroids in the study eye or use of periocular corticosteroids in the study eye within the 3 months prior to Day 1
-
Iris neovascularization, vitreous hemorrhage, traction retinal detachment, or preretinal fibrosis involving the macula in either the study eye or fellow eye
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chatswood | New South Wales | Australia | 2067 | |
2 | Parramatta | New South Wales | Australia | 2150 | |
3 | Sydney | New South Wales | Australia | 2000 | |
4 | Westmead | New South Wales | Australia | 2145 | |
5 | East Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | 3002 | |
6 | Nedlands | Western Australia | Australia | 6009 | |
7 | Innsbruck | Austria | 6020 | ||
8 | Linz | Austria | 4021 | ||
9 | Wien | Austria | 1090 | ||
10 | Paris | Cedex 12 | France | 75557 | |
11 | Nantes | Cedex 1 | France | 44093 | |
12 | Bordeaux | France | 33000 | ||
13 | Dijon | France | 21033 | ||
14 | Marseille | France | 13008 | ||
15 | Paris | France | 75015 | ||
16 | Freiburg | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 79106 | |
17 | Heidelberg | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 69120 | |
18 | Tübingen | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 72076 | |
19 | München | Bayern | Germany | 81675 | |
20 | Regensburg | Bayern | Germany | 93053 | |
21 | Darmstadt | Hessen | Germany | 64297 | |
22 | Frankfurt | Hessen | Germany | 60596 | |
23 | Marburg | Hessen | Germany | 35037 | |
24 | Göttingen | Niedersachsen | Germany | 37075 | |
25 | Aachen | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 52074 | |
26 | Bonn | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 53105 | |
27 | Essen | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 45122 | |
28 | Köln | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 50924 | |
29 | Münster | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 48145 | |
30 | Ludwigshafen | Rheinland-Pfalz | Germany | 67063 | |
31 | Mainz | Rheinland-Pfalz | Germany | 55131 | |
32 | Homburg | Saarland | Germany | 66421 | |
33 | Chemnitz | Sachsen | Germany | 09116 | |
34 | Dresden | Sachsen | Germany | 01307 | |
35 | Dresden | Sachsen | Germany | 06067 | |
36 | Leipzig | Sachsen | Germany | 04103 | |
37 | Kiel | Schleswig-Holstein | Germany | 24105 | |
38 | Lübeck | Schleswig-Holstein | Germany | 23538 | |
39 | Berlin | Germany | 13353 | ||
40 | Hamburg | Germany | 20251 | ||
41 | Budapest | Hungary | 1089 | ||
42 | Budapest | Hungary | 1106 | ||
43 | Budapest | Hungary | 1133 | ||
44 | Debrecen | Hungary | 4032 | ||
45 | Veszprem | Hungary | 8200 | ||
46 | Zalaegerszeg | Hungary | H-8900 | ||
47 | Ancona | Italy | 60126 | ||
48 | Bari | Italy | 70124 | ||
49 | Catania | Italy | 95123 | ||
50 | Firenze | Italy | 50134 | ||
51 | Milano | Italy | 20122 | ||
52 | Milano | Italy | 20132 | ||
53 | Milano | Italy | 20157 | ||
54 | Padova | Italy | 35128 | ||
55 | Roma | Italy | 00133 | ||
56 | Roma | Italy | 00198 | ||
57 | Torino | Italy | 10122 | ||
58 | Nagoya | Aichi | Japan | 466-8560 | |
59 | Nagoya | Aichi | Japan | 467-8602 | |
60 | Urayasu | Chiba | Japan | 279-0021 | |
61 | Suita | Osaka | Japan | 565-0871 | |
62 | Chiyoda-ku | Tokyo | Japan | 101-8309 | |
63 | Kyoto | Japan | 606-8507 | ||
64 | Seongnam-si | Gyeonggido | Korea, Republic of | 463-707 | |
65 | Incheon | Korea, Republic of | 405-760 | ||
66 | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | 110 744 | ||
67 | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | 137-701 | ||
68 | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | 138-736 | ||
69 | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | |||
70 | Riga | Latvia | 1002 | ||
71 | Riga | Latvia | 1050 | ||
72 | Singapore | Singapore | 119074 | ||
73 | Singapore | Singapore | 168751 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Bayer
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
- Study Director: Bayer Study Director, Bayer
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- 14130
- 2009-010973-19
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept Injection | Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 106 | 71 |
Participants Received Treatment | 104 | 68 |
Fulfilled Requirements of FAS Population | 103 | 68 |
Completed Week 24, From FAS | 97 | 57 |
Completed Week 52, From FAS | 91 | 52 |
COMPLETED | 90 | 52 |
NOT COMPLETED | 16 | 19 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Sham Treatment | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 104 | 68 | 172 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
60.0
(12.3)
|
63.8
(13.3)
|
61.5
(12.8)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
45
43.3%
|
31
45.6%
|
76
44.2%
|
Male |
59
56.7%
|
37
54.4%
|
96
55.8%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
4
3.8%
|
1
1.5%
|
5
2.9%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
100
96.2%
|
66
97.1%
|
166
96.5%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
1
1.5%
|
1
0.6%
|
Baseline Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter scores (Letters correctly read) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Letters correctly read] |
53.5
(15.7)
|
50.9
(15.4)
|
52.5
(15.6)
|
Number of participants with baseline retinal perfusion (Number) [Number] | |||
Perfused |
90
86.5%
|
54
79.4%
|
144
83.7%
|
Nonperfused |
7
6.7%
|
7
10.3%
|
14
8.1%
|
Indeterminate |
7
6.7%
|
7
10.3%
|
14
8.1%
|
Baseline Retinal Thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) (microns) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [microns] |
682.78
(233.36)
|
638.66
(224.69)
|
665.34
(230.33)
|
Baseline intraocular pressure (mm Hg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm Hg] |
15.2
(2.8)
|
14.4
(2.7)
|
14.9
(2.8)
|
Number of participants with time since Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) diagnosis (Number) [Number] | |||
>= 2 months |
46
44.2%
|
33
48.5%
|
79
45.9%
|
< 2 months |
56
53.8%
|
35
51.5%
|
91
52.9%
|
Missing |
2
1.9%
|
0
0%
|
2
1.2%
|
Baseline National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) total score (scores on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale] |
79.66
(13.06)
|
78.94
(14.00)
|
79.38
(13.40)
|
European questionnaire 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) total score (score on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
0.87
(0.15)
|
0.86
(0.16)
|
0.87
(0.15)
|
Race (Number) [Number] | |||
Asian |
26
25%
|
15
22.1%
|
41
23.8%
|
White |
75
72.1%
|
49
72.1%
|
124
72.1%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
3
2.9%
|
4
5.9%
|
7
4.1%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score Compared With Baseline at Week 24 With Discontinued Participants Before Week 24 Evaluated as Failures |
---|---|
Description | Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 24 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Measure Participants | 103 | 68 |
Number [Percentage of participants] |
60.2
57.9%
|
22.1
32.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321), Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis of difference of Eylea minus Sham of 0 was tested. In the database close after Week 24, basis for primary efficacy evaluation, 56 Sham / 96 Eylea subjects were considered as week 24 completers. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | CMH adjusted difference |
Estimated Value | 38.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 24.4 to 52.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The estimate is calculated as Eylea minus Sham. A positive value shows Eylea showed a higher BCVA total score compared to Sham. |
Title | Change From Baseline in BCVA as Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 24 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) |
---|---|
Description | Defined study baseline range of ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 24 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. However, because this was assessed at the screening visit, subjects may have had a higher BCVA recorded at the baseline visit and would not have been excluded from the study. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Measure Participants | 103 | 68 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Letters correctly read] |
71.6
(17.1)
|
54.3
(20.2)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321), Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis was equality in change from baseline to Week 24 in BCVA total letter score between Eylea and Sham. If primary efficacy was successful, secondary efficacy endpoints were tested in a pre-specified fixed sequence testing procedure. Change in BCVA letter score was to be tested first in this sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | As primary efficacy evaluation was significant, and this p-value was below significance level of two-sided <.05, the fixed sequence testing did continue with next secondary endpoint. | |
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | ANOVA, adjusting for region and baseline BCVA category as fixed factors. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in Least square means |
Estimated Value | 14.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 10.8 to 18.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The difference is calculated as Eylea minus Sham. A positive value indicates Eylea showed a higher change in BCVA total score until week 24 compared to Sham. |
Title | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full-Analysis Set with assessment for this outcome measure; imputation technique: LOCF |
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Measure Participants | 103 | 67 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [microns] |
-448.58
(256.02)
|
-169.27
(224.72)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321), Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis was equality in change from baseline to Week 24 in central retinal thickness between Eylea and Sham. If primary efficacy was successful, secondary efficacy end points were to be tested in a pre-specified fixed sequence testing procedure. Change in central retinal thickness was to be tested at second place in this sequence. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | As fixed sequence testing did reject nullhypothesis of change from baseline in BCVA until week 24, and this p-value was below significance level of two-sided <.05, the fixed sequence testing did continue with next secondary endpoint. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ANCOVA, stratified by region and baseline BCVA category, baseline central retinal thickness added as covariate. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in Least square (LS) means |
Estimated Value | -239.42 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -286.31 to -192.53 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The difference is calculated as Eylea minus Sham. A negative value indicates Eylea showed a higher reduction in change in central retinal thickness until week 24 compared to Sham. |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Developed Neovascularization During the First 24 Weeks |
---|---|
Description | Formation of blood vessels in the anterior segment, optic disc, or elsewhere in the fundus up to Week 24 |
Time Frame | From baseline until Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set |
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Measure Participants | 103 | 68 |
Any neovascularization |
2.9
2.8%
|
4.4
6.5%
|
Anterior segment neovascularization |
1.9
1.8%
|
1.5
2.2%
|
Neovascularization of the optic disc (NVD) |
0.0
0%
|
0.0
0%
|
Neovascularization elsewhere in the fundus (NVE) |
1.0
1%
|
2.9
4.3%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321), Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | Nullhypothesis of no difference in development of neovascularizations between Eylea and Sham group was tested. (Any neovascularization) | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.5947 |
Comments | As fixed sequence testing did reject nullhypothesis of change from baseline in CRT until week 24, and this p-value was not below significance level of two-sided <.05, the fixed sequence testing did end with this evaluation. | |
Method | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |
Comments | Cochrane-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by region and baseline BCVA category. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | CMH adjusted Difference |
Estimated Value | -1.5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -7.4 to 4.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Total Score at Week 24 - LOCF |
---|---|
Description | The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales which are all scored from 0-100. To reach the overall composite score, each sub-scale score is averaged in order to give each sub-scale equal weight |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full-Analysis Set with assessment for this outcome measure; imputation technique: LOCF |
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Measure Participants | 96 | 65 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Scores on a scale] |
7.46
(9.55)
|
3.55
(9.74)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321), Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in LS means |
Estimated Value | 4.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.7 to 6.8 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | As the fixed sequence of secondary endpoints stopped with proportion of neovascularizations developed until week 24, 95% confidence interval is only of descriptive nature. |
Title | Change From Baseline in European Five-dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D) Score at Week 24 - LOCF |
---|---|
Description | EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire based on a scale from -0.594 (worst) to 1.00 (best). |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full-Analysis Set with assessment for this outcome measure; imputation technique: LOCF |
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Measure Participants | 95 | 64 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Scores on a scale] |
0.029
(0.139)
|
-0.002
(0.195)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321), Sham Treatment |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in LS Means |
Estimated Value | 0.044 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.002 to 0.09 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | As the fixed sequence of secondary endpoints stopped with proportion of neovascularizations developed until week 24, 95% confidence interval is only of descriptive nature. |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 20) | Sham Treatment (Until Week 20) | Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 48) | Sham Treatment (Until Week 48) | Aflibercept Injection Continued (Until Week 68) | Sham Treatment Then Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 68) | ||||||
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20. Participants were observed until Week 24. Participants in the safety population were at risk. | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20. Participants were observed until Week 24. Participants in the safety population were at risk. | Participants who continued the study drug until Week 24 received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Participants were observed from Week 24 until Week 52. Participants in the safety population that completed Week 24 were at risk. | Participants who continued the study drug until Week 24 received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Week 24 to Week 48. Participants were observed from Week 24 until Week 52. Participants in the safety population that completed Week 24 were at risk. | Participants on IAI who continued the study drug until Week 52, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 52, 60 and 68. Participants were observed starting from Week 52. Participants in the safety population that completed Week 52 were at risk. | Participants on sham treatment switched to IAI, received a 2 mg dose of IAI at Week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. Participants were observed starting from Week 52. Participants in the safety population that completed Week 52 were at risk. | ||||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||||||
Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 20) | Sham Treatment (Until Week 20) | Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 48) | Sham Treatment (Until Week 48) | Aflibercept Injection Continued (Until Week 68) | Sham Treatment Then Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 68) | |||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||||||
Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 20) | Sham Treatment (Until Week 20) | Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 48) | Sham Treatment (Until Week 48) | Aflibercept Injection Continued (Until Week 68) | Sham Treatment Then Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 68) | |||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 8/104 (7.7%) | 8/68 (11.8%) | 14/97 (14.4%) | 7/57 (12.3%) | 4/91 (4.4%) | 3/52 (5.8%) | ||||||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||||||||
Aortic valve incompetence | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Cardiac failure | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Coronary artery stenosis | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Diastolic dysfunction | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Mitral valve incompetence | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Eye disorders | ||||||||||||
Blindness unilateral | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Glaucoma | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/97 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Iris neovascularisation | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Macular fibrosis | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Macular ischaemia | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Macular oedema | 0/104 (0%) | 2/68 (2.9%) | 4/97 (4.1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Retinal vein occlusion | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Visual acuity reduced | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 2/91 (2.2%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Vitreous detachment | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Vitreous haemorrhage | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1/97 (1%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||||
Diverticular perforation | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||||||
Hepatic function abnormal | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||||
Furuncle | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Gastroenteritis | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Pneumonia | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1/97 (1%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Vestibular neuronitis | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||||||
Fall | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Femur fracture | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Hand fracture | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Humerus fracture | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Radius fracture | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Spinal compression fracture | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||||||
Intervertebral disc protrusion | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Spinal column stenosis | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||||||||
Breast cancer | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Oropharyngeal cancer stage unspecified | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||||
Paraesthesia | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Syncope | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 2/57 (3.5%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Transient ischaemic attack | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||||||
Dyspnoea | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Laryngeal granuloma | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Pulmonary hypertension | 0/104 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||||||||||
Ischaemic heart disease prophylaxis | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||||||
Circulatory collapse | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||||||
Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 20) | Sham Treatment (Until Week 20) | Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 48) | Sham Treatment (Until Week 48) | Aflibercept Injection Continued (Until Week 68) | Sham Treatment Then Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 68) | |||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 52/104 (50%) | 44/68 (64.7%) | 66/97 (68%) | 30/57 (52.6%) | 38/91 (41.8%) | 19/52 (36.5%) | ||||||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||||||||
Anaemia | 1/104 (1%) | 0/68 (0%) | 0/97 (0%) | 3/57 (5.3%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Eye disorders | ||||||||||||
Conjunctival haemorrhage | 10/104 (9.6%) | 3/68 (4.4%) | 3/97 (3.1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 9/91 (9.9%) | 3/52 (5.8%) | ||||||
Eye irritation | 3/104 (2.9%) | 7/68 (10.3%) | 4/97 (4.1%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 2/52 (3.8%) | ||||||
Eye pain | 12/104 (11.5%) | 3/68 (4.4%) | 6/97 (6.2%) | 2/57 (3.5%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Foreign body sensation in eyes | 6/104 (5.8%) | 5/68 (7.4%) | 2/97 (2.1%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Lacrimation increased | 3/104 (2.9%) | 4/68 (5.9%) | 3/97 (3.1%) | 4/57 (7%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 2/52 (3.8%) | ||||||
Macular fibrosis | 1/104 (1%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 5/97 (5.2%) | 4/57 (7%) | 0/91 (0%) | 3/52 (5.8%) | ||||||
Macular ischaemia | 7/104 (6.7%) | 5/68 (7.4%) | 3/97 (3.1%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/91 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Macular oedema | 2/104 (1.9%) | 9/68 (13.2%) | 30/97 (30.9%) | 7/57 (12.3%) | 17/91 (18.7%) | 2/52 (3.8%) | ||||||
Ocular hyperaemia | 5/104 (4.8%) | 4/68 (5.9%) | 2/97 (2.1%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 4/91 (4.4%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Optic disc vascular disorder | 5/104 (4.8%) | 3/68 (4.4%) | 3/97 (3.1%) | 3/57 (5.3%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Retinal exudates | 8/104 (7.7%) | 5/68 (7.4%) | 4/97 (4.1%) | 3/57 (5.3%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Retinal haemorrhage | 4/104 (3.8%) | 6/68 (8.8%) | 11/97 (11.3%) | 5/57 (8.8%) | 5/91 (5.5%) | 2/52 (3.8%) | ||||||
Retinal vascular disorder | 6/104 (5.8%) | 7/68 (10.3%) | 10/97 (10.3%) | 2/57 (3.5%) | 0/91 (0%) | 2/52 (3.8%) | ||||||
Visual acuity reduced | 2/104 (1.9%) | 7/68 (10.3%) | 10/97 (10.3%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 7/91 (7.7%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Vitreous detachment | 2/104 (1.9%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 7/97 (7.2%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Vitreous floaters | 6/104 (5.8%) | 0/68 (0%) | 1/97 (1%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||||
Nausea | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 0/97 (0%) | 3/57 (5.3%) | 0/91 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||||
Influenza | 2/104 (1.9%) | 0/68 (0%) | 5/97 (5.2%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Nasopharyngitis | 8/104 (7.7%) | 6/68 (8.8%) | 10/97 (10.3%) | 11/57 (19.3%) | 4/91 (4.4%) | 2/52 (3.8%) | ||||||
Investigations | ||||||||||||
Intraocular pressure increased | 9/104 (8.7%) | 4/68 (5.9%) | 14/97 (14.4%) | 2/57 (3.5%) | 2/91 (2.2%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Visual acuity tests abnormal | 0/104 (0%) | 1/68 (1.5%) | 5/97 (5.2%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||||||
Arthralgia | 1/104 (1%) | 5/68 (7.4%) | 2/97 (2.1%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 2/91 (2.2%) | 0/52 (0%) | ||||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||||
Headache | 7/104 (6.7%) | 4/68 (5.9%) | 4/97 (4.1%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 1/91 (1.1%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | ||||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||||||
Hypertension | 4/104 (3.8%) | 3/68 (4.4%) | 4/97 (4.1%) | 4/57 (7%) | 3/91 (3.3%) | 2/52 (3.8%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Publishing of result communication only after Bayer´s written approval. Manuscript to Bayer sixty days before public release. If no written Bayer comment within 60 days consider approval given. If multi-site study, principal investigator (PI) not do independently publish results before publication of the multi-site paper, but PI not restricted from 24 months from study to completion onwards.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Therapeutic Area Head |
---|---|
Organization | BAYER |
Phone | |
clinical-trials-contact@bayerhealthcare.com |
- 14130
- 2009-010973-19