Comparison of MTX+Anti-TNF to MTX+Conventional DMARDs in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Failed MTX Alone (SWEFOT)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The Swefot trial was designed to compare two treatment strategies for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (less than 1 year symptom duration): the use of a combination of traditional antirheumatic medications (DMARDs), versus a combination including a newer "biological" anti-TNF medication. In order to make this trial consistent with current practices in rheumatology, all patients were first given the most commonly used antirheumatic medication, methotrexate (MTX). After 3-4 months those patients who had not responded adequately to this treatment were randomized to receive either MTX plus sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine, or MTX plus infliximab. Again, to be truly life-like, the trial allowed patients who could not tolerate one of the added medications to switch in treatment - but keeping with the same strategy - so that sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine could be replaced by cyclosporin A, and infliximab by etanercept. The primary outcome in this trial was the percentage of patients who, after one year of treatment, achieved a "good response" as defined by Eular.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
The Swefot trial was designed to compare two treatment strategies for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (less than 1 year symptom duration): the use of a combination of traditional antirheumatic medications (DMARDs), versus a combination including a newer "biological" anti-TNF medication. In order to make this trial consistent with current practices in rheumatology, all patients were first given the most commonly used antirheumatic medication, methotrexate (MTX). After 3-4 months those patients who had not responded adequately to this treatment were randomized to receive either MTX plus sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine, or MTX plus infliximab. Again, to be truly life-like, the trial allowed patients who could not tolerate one of the added medications to switch in treatment - but keeping with the same strategy - so that sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine could be replaced by cyclosporin A, and infliximab by etanercept. The primary outcome in this trial was the percentage of patients who, after one year of treatment, achieved a "good response" as defined by Eular. Secondary outcomes include Eular and ACR responses, HAQ and other QOL assessments, radiographic outcomes, and health-economic outcomes including EQ5D.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: A MTX+SSZ+Plaquenil |
Drug: conventional DMARD combination
MTX+SSZ+Plaquenil; can be changed to MTX+cyclosporin within protocol
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: B MTX+Infliximab |
Biological: MTX plus anti-TNF
MTX + infliximab; can be changed to MTX + etanercept within protocol
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- EULAR individual response [12 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- All core set variables; function; x-ray; health-economic [6-24 months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- RA, symptom duration < 12 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindication to any of the trial medications
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutet
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Johan Bratt, MD PhD, Karolinska University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- P0 3013 Swefot