EMDR for Persistent Pain in RA

Sponsor
Medisch Spectrum Twente (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05941559
Collaborator
University of Twente (Other), Leiden University Medical Center (Other)
10
1
3
14
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Rationale: Around 20% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have persistent pain, despite having well-controlled disease activity. There is a significant overlap in underlying mechanisms between post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and persistent pain. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is a proven effective treatment for PTSD and evidence is growing that it may also be effective for persistent pain. Objective: To assess the feasibility and estimate the effectiveness of EMDR in RA patients with persistent pain despite inflammation being under control.

Study design: A multiple-baseline single-case experimental design (SCED) across three time series. Participants will be randomized to one of the three time series. Within the time series the start of the intervention is randomly determined. Four participants will be assigned to the shortest, three to the medium and three to the longest baseline length. The SCED study consists of a baseline phase (A1), intervention phase (B), post-treatment phase (A2), follow-up phase 1 (A3), and follow-up phase 2 (A4).

Study population: Subjects are RA patients > 18 years with low disease activity (DAS28<3.2) at >2 measurements over the previous 12 months and concurrent elevated pain scores (NRS-pain>6).

Intervention (if applicable): EMDR therapy consists of an intake and eight sessions of 90 minutes in total, performed according to the EMDR standard protocol, conducted by four psychologists, all are level-II trained, under the supervision of an EMDR Europe consultant. EMDR focuses on processing traumatic memories, pain-related memories, and current physical pain.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint for effectiveness is the pre-treatment phase A1 to post-treatment phase A2 difference in NRS pain intensity. Feasibility is examined by monitoring recruitment, dropout rates, and treatment satisfaction. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: If the therapy is effective, pain intensity decreases, additional physical complaints of RA decrease and participants experience less discomfort from their pain in daily life. EMDR therapy is an evidence-based treatment for PTSD and the reduction of posttraumatic stress favors the recovery of physical complaints. Participating in the study includes two conversations for inclusion (two times 60 minutes consisting of one telephone conversation and one face-to-face conversation), attending the EMDR therapy intake (one time 90 minutes) and sessions (eight times 90 minutes), and daily registration of complaints (about two minutes per day) via a smartphone application, completing the questionnaires (about 14-28 minutes at six specific time points during the study), and an exit conversation at six months follow up. Daily registration will take 18 to 20 weeks maximum. At the three- and six-month follow-up, participants will be asked to register daily for 14 days. EMDR sessions can be emotionally intense, but never are as challenging as living with unprocessed (traumatic) pain-related memories. There are no risks associated with EMDR therapy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: EMDR
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A multiple-baseline single-case experimental design (SCED) across three time series. Participants will be randomized to one of the three time series. Within the time series the start of the intervention is randomly determined. Four participants will be assigned to the shortest, three to the medium and three to the longest baseline length. The SCED study consists of a baseline phase (A1), intervention phase (B), post-treatment phase (A2), follow-up phase 1 (A3), and follow-up phase 2 (A4).A multiple-baseline single-case experimental design (SCED) across three time series. Participants will be randomized to one of the three time series. Within the time series the start of the intervention is randomly determined. Four participants will be assigned to the shortest, three to the medium and three to the longest baseline length. The SCED study consists of a baseline phase (A1), intervention phase (B), post-treatment phase (A2), follow-up phase 1 (A3), and follow-up phase 2 (A4).
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients With Persistent Pain Despite Inflammation Being Under Control: a Multiple Baseline Single Case Experimental Design Study Across Ten Cases
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2024
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Shortest baseline length

Intervention starting points are at day 15, 16, 17, 18 or 19.

Other: EMDR
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing

Other: Medium baseline length

Intervention starting points are at day 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24.

Other: EMDR
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing

Other: Longest baseline length

Intervention starting points are at day 25, 26, 27, 28, or 29.

Other: EMDR
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Effectiveness [100 Days]

    Difference in NRS pain intensity

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Clinical diagnosis of RA

  • Stable low disease activity Score in 28 joints, i.e. DAS28 <3.2 at >2 measurements over the previous 12 months and at the time of inclusion

  • Elevated pain scores (NRS pain >6) at >2 measurements over the previous 12 months and at the time of inclusion

  • Sufficient knowledge of the Dutch language

Exclusion Criteria:
  • An acute condition of psychosis or bipolar disorder

  • An acute suicidal risk

  • Substance dependency

  • Not stable on the use of medication

  • Visual or hearing problems interfering with the EMDR procedure

  • Other psychological/psychiatric treatment

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Medisch Spectrum Twente Enschede Overijssel Netherlands 7512KZ

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
  • University of Twente
  • Leiden University Medical Center

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Harald E. Vonkeman, prof.dr., Medisch Spectrum Twente
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05941559
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • EMDR in RA
First Posted:
Jul 12, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jul 12, 2023
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Harald E. Vonkeman, prof.dr., Medisch Spectrum Twente
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 12, 2023