A Study to Assess Efficacy With Respect to Clinical Improvement in Disease Activity and Safety of Tocilizumab in Patients Wtih Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This single arm study will assess the effectiveness of tocilizumab in combination with traditional DMARDs with regard to the clinical improvement in disease activity (achievement of LDAS) after 24 weeks' treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to current traditional DMARD and/or anti-TNF therapy. Patients will receive tocilizumab 8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks, in addition to ongoing DMARDs at the stable pre-entry dose prescribed by the physician, for a total of 6 infusions during the regular treatment period and a further 6 infusions during an optional extension phase. The anticipated time on study treatment is 6 to 12 months, and the target sample size is <500 individuals.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tocilizumab
|
Drug: Tocilizumab
8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score at Week 24 [Week 24]
Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) is defined as Disease Activity score less than or equal to (≤ ) 3.2. Disease activity score 28 (DAS28) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 100-mm Visual analog scale [VAS]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Absolute Changes in DAS28 From Baseline [Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24]
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 100-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
- Percentage of Participants With a Response at Week 24 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category [Week 24]
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤ 0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.
- Percentage of Participants With a DAS28 Response at Weeks 4 and 24 [Weeks 4 and 24]
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and painful joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR and participant's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment using VAS) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 <2.6 = remission and a clinically significant (CS) reduction was defined as ≥1.2.
- Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/ACR50/ACR70) Response [Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24]
ACR20/50/70 response: ≥20%, 50%, or 70% improvement, respectively, in swollen and tender joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ-DI]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
- Change From Baseline in Swollen and Tender Joint Counts at Week 24 [Week 24]
Swollen joint count: 66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66. Tender joint counts: 68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68.
- Change From Baseline in the Levels of C-Reactive Protein at Week 24 [Week 24]
The serum concentration of CRP is measured in mg/L. A reduction in the level was considered an improvement.
- Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Pain (VAS) at Week 24 [Week 24]
Participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=pain absent and 100=unbearable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain.
- Change From Baseline in Participant and Physician Assessment of Global Disease Activity (VAS) at Week 24 [Week 24]
Participant's global assessment of disease activity was an overall assessment of their current disease activity on a 100-mm horizontal VAS scale (left-hand extreme: "no disease activity"; right-hand extreme: "maximum disease activity"). Physician's global assessment of disease activity was measured as participant's current disease activity on a 100-mm horizontal VAS scale (left hand extreme: "no disease activity"; right-hand extreme: "maximum disease activity").
- Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score [Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24]
CDAI was calculated according to the following formula: CDAI = Number of swollen joints (plus) + Number of tender joints + VAS disease activity participant assessment + VAS disease activity investigator assessment. The maximum score was 334 (66 joints + 68 joints + 100 mm + 100 mm); higher scores indicated higher disease activity.
- Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 [Week 24]
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
- Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24 [Week 24]
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status.
- Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Week 24 [Week 24]
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Absolute change was defined as the change from baseline to Week 24.
- Participant's Global Assessment of Pain as Assessed by Patient Take Home Form (PTHF) [Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, and 4]
Participant's were asked to state the worst level of pain felt in the past 24 hours using a 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=no pain and 100=unbearable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their level of pain. Participants were asked to document their response during the first 4 treatment weeks at approximately the same time every day.
- Duration of Morning Stiffness as Assessed Using PTHF [Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, and 4]
Duration of morning stiffness: participants were asked 'how long did your morning stiffness last from the time you woke up yesterday' and the response was provided in minutes and hours. Participants were asked to document their response during the first 4 treatment weeks at approximately the same time every day.
- Participant Assessment of Fatigue/Tiredness as Assessed Using PTHF [Baseline and Weeks 1, 2 and 4]
Participants were asked to assess their overall level of fatigue/tiredness during the previous 24 hours using a 100-mm horizontal VAS with 0=none and 100=very severe. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of fatigue. Participants were asked to document their response during the first 4 treatment weeks at approximately the same time every day.
- Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Score [Week 24]
The TSQM is a general measure of participants treatment satisfaction and consists of 14 questions that result in 4 subscales: "effectiveness", "side-effects", "convenience" and "global satisfaction". All subscale scores range from 0 to 100%, with 100% being the best possible result.
- Changes in Hemoglobin [Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 24]
Hemoglobin levels were determined as a hematology parameter to measure changes in disease related anemia.
- Changes in C-Reactive Protein [Baseline, Weeks 1, 2 ,4 and 24]
CRP is an acute phase inflammatory marker used as a measure of inflammation. A reduction in CRP is considered to be an improvement.
- Changes in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) [Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 24]
ESR is an inflammation marker used to determine acute phase response.
- Percentage of Participants Withdrawing From Study Treatment Because of Insufficient Therapeutic Response [Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24]
Participants who withdrew from study drug due to other reasons were not taken into account.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
adult patients, >=18 years of age;
-
rheumatoid arthritis of >=6 months duration diagnosed according to the revised 1987 ACR criteria;
-
DAS28 of >3.2;
-
At screening either ESR >=28 mm/h or CRP >=1 mg/dL;
-
Having received permitted DMARDs, 1 or more; current DMARD therapy must have been at a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to baseline.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following screening;
-
functional class IV as identified by the ACR classification of functional status in RA;
-
rheumatoid autoimmune disease other than RA;
-
prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aachen | Germany | 52064 | ||
2 | Bad Abbach | Germany | 93077 | ||
3 | Bad Aibling | Germany | 83043 | ||
4 | Bad Bramstedt | Germany | 24576 | ||
5 | Bad Nauheim | Germany | 61231 | ||
6 | Baden-baden | Germany | 76530 | ||
7 | Bayreuth | Germany | 95445 | ||
8 | Berlin | Germany | 10117 | ||
9 | Berlin | Germany | 12161 | ||
10 | Berlin | Germany | 12435 | ||
11 | Berlin | Germany | 13055 | ||
12 | Berlin | Germany | 13125 | ||
13 | Berlin | Germany | 14109 | ||
14 | Berlin | Germany | 14163 | ||
15 | Bremen | Germany | 28199 | ||
16 | Cuxhaven | Germany | 27476 | ||
17 | Damp | Germany | 24351 | ||
18 | Donaueschingen | Germany | 78166 | ||
19 | Dresden | Germany | 01067 | ||
20 | Dresden | Germany | 01109 | ||
21 | Dresden | Germany | 01307 | ||
22 | Düsseldorf | Germany | 40217 | ||
23 | Düsseldorf | Germany | 40225 | ||
24 | Erfurt | Germany | 99096 | ||
25 | Erlangen | Germany | 91054 | ||
26 | Erlangen | Germany | 91056 | ||
27 | Essen | Germany | 45239 | ||
28 | Frankfurt Am Main | Germany | 60590 | ||
29 | Frankfurt | Germany | 60596 | ||
30 | Fulda | Germany | 36039 | ||
31 | Gommern | Germany | 39245 | ||
32 | Goslar | Germany | 38642 | ||
33 | Grafschaft | Germany | 53501 | ||
34 | Göttingen | Germany | 37075 | ||
35 | Hagen | Germany | 58135 | ||
36 | Halle | Germany | 06108 | ||
37 | Halle | Germany | 06120 | ||
38 | Hamburg | Germany | 22081 | ||
39 | Hamburg | Germany | 22147 | ||
40 | Hamburg | Germany | 22609 | ||
41 | Hamburg | Germany | 22767 | ||
42 | Hannover | Germany | 30625 | ||
43 | Heidelberg | Germany | 69120 | ||
44 | Herne | Germany | 44652 | ||
45 | Hildesheim | Germany | 31134 | ||
46 | Hofheim | Germany | 65719 | ||
47 | Homburg/saar | Germany | 66424 | ||
48 | Hoyerswerda | Germany | 02977 | ||
49 | Köln | Germany | 50679 | ||
50 | Köln | Germany | 50924 | ||
51 | Leipzig | Germany | 04103 | ||
52 | Ludwigsfelde | Germany | 14974 | ||
53 | Ludwigshafen | Germany | 67063 | ||
54 | Lüneburg | Germany | 21335 | ||
55 | Mainz | Germany | 55122 | ||
56 | Mainz | Germany | 55131 | ||
57 | Marburg | Germany | 35037 | ||
58 | Muenchen | Germany | 80336 | ||
59 | München | Germany | 80335 | ||
60 | München | Germany | 81541 | ||
61 | München | Germany | 81925 | ||
62 | Münster | Germany | 48149 | ||
63 | Naunhof | Germany | 04683 | ||
64 | Neuss | Germany | 41460 | ||
65 | Nürnberg | Germany | 90402 | ||
66 | Oberammergau | Germany | 82487 | ||
67 | Osnabrück | Germany | 49074 | ||
68 | Pirna | Germany | 01796 | ||
69 | Plochingen | Germany | 73207 | ||
70 | Potsdam | Germany | 14469 | ||
71 | Ratingen | Germany | 40882 | ||
72 | Rostock | Germany | 18059 | ||
73 | Sendenhorst | Germany | 48324 | ||
74 | Stuttgart | Germany | 70178 | ||
75 | Stuttgart | Germany | 70372 | ||
76 | Treuenbrietzen | Germany | 14929 | ||
77 | Tübingen | Germany | 72076 | ||
78 | ULM | Germany | 89081 | ||
79 | Wiesbaden | Germany | 65189 | ||
80 | Würselen | Germany | 52146 | ||
81 | Zeven | Germany | 27404 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Investigators
- Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- ML21469
- 2008-000105-11
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 286 |
COMPLETED | 239 |
NOT COMPLETED | 47 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Overall Participants | 286 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
54.9
(12.2)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
216
75.5%
|
Male |
70
24.5%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) is defined as Disease Activity score less than or equal to (≤ ) 3.2. Disease activity score 28 (DAS28) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 100-mm Visual analog scale [VAS]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of Participants] |
57
19.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Tocilizumab |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis: Proportion of participants reaching LDAS (≤ 3.2) at Week 24 equals (=) expected proportion of 42%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Exact Binomial Test | |
Comments |
Title | Absolute Changes in DAS28 From Baseline |
---|---|
Description | DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 100-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. |
Time Frame | Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; only participants with a DAS28 value at baseline were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 274 |
Week 1 |
-1.31
(1.1)
|
Week 2 |
-2.1
(1.2)
|
Week 4 |
-2.4
(1.2)
|
Week 8 |
-2.8
(1.3)
|
Week 12 |
-3.2
(1.4)
|
Week 16 |
-3.2
(1.4)
|
Week 20 |
-3.3
(1.4)
|
Week 24 |
-3.4
(1.4)
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With a Response at Week 24 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category |
---|---|
Description | The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to ≤5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with DAS28 ≤5.1; non-responders: change from baseline ≤ 0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Good |
54.9
19.2%
|
Moderate |
20.3
7.1%
|
None |
24.8
8.7%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With a DAS28 Response at Weeks 4 and 24 |
---|---|
Description | DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and painful joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR and participant's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment using VAS) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 <2.6 = remission and a clinically significant (CS) reduction was defined as ≥1.2. |
Time Frame | Weeks 4 and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Week 4, CS reduction |
75.2
26.3%
|
Week 4, Remission |
23.1
8.1%
|
Week 4, CS reduction or remission |
76.6
26.8%
|
Week 4, LDAS |
40.9
14.3%
|
Week 24, CS reduction |
74.5
26%
|
Week 24, Remission |
47.6
16.6%
|
Week 24, CS reduction or remission |
76.6
26.8%
|
Week 24, LDAS |
57.0
19.9%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/ACR50/ACR70) Response |
---|---|
Description | ACR20/50/70 response: ≥20%, 50%, or 70% improvement, respectively, in swollen and tender joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ-DI]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). |
Time Frame | Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Week 1 ACR20 |
25.2
8.8%
|
Week 1 ACR50 |
7.0
2.4%
|
Week 1 ACR70 |
2.4
0.8%
|
Week 2 ACR20 |
41.3
14.4%
|
Week 2 ACR50 |
14.7
5.1%
|
Week 2 ACR70 |
4.9
1.7%
|
Week 4 ACR20 |
50.0
17.5%
|
Week 4 ACR50 |
25.5
8.9%
|
Week 4 ACR70 |
12.2
4.3%
|
Week 8 ACR20 |
64.3
22.5%
|
Week 8 ACR50 |
37.4
13.1%
|
Week 8 ACR70 |
17.1
6%
|
Week 12 ACR20 |
69.6
24.3%
|
Week 12 ACR50 |
48.6
17%
|
Week 12 ACR70 |
26.2
9.2%
|
Week 16 ACR20 |
67.5
23.6%
|
Week 16 ACR50 |
49.0
17.1%
|
Week 16 ACR70 |
29.4
10.3%
|
Week 20 ACR20 |
67.8
23.7%
|
Week 20 ACR50 |
49.7
17.4%
|
Week 20 ACR70 |
33.9
11.9%
|
Week 24 ACR20 |
65.0
22.7%
|
Week 24 ACR50 |
50.7
17.7%
|
Week 24 ACR70 |
33.9
11.9%
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Swollen and Tender Joint Counts at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | Swollen joint count: 66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66. Tender joint counts: 68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks up to week 20 for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Number of swollen joints |
-9.6
|
Number of tender joints |
-13.4
|
Title | Change From Baseline in the Levels of C-Reactive Protein at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The serum concentration of CRP is measured in mg/L. A reduction in the level was considered an improvement. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks up to week 20 for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [mg/L] |
-20.1
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Pain (VAS) at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | Participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=pain absent and 100=unbearable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks up to week 20 for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [mm] |
-36.2
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Participant and Physician Assessment of Global Disease Activity (VAS) at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | Participant's global assessment of disease activity was an overall assessment of their current disease activity on a 100-mm horizontal VAS scale (left-hand extreme: "no disease activity"; right-hand extreme: "maximum disease activity"). Physician's global assessment of disease activity was measured as participant's current disease activity on a 100-mm horizontal VAS scale (left hand extreme: "no disease activity"; right-hand extreme: "maximum disease activity"). |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks up to week 20 for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Participant's assessment |
-35.9
|
Physician's assessment |
-44.9
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score |
---|---|
Description | CDAI was calculated according to the following formula: CDAI = Number of swollen joints (plus) + Number of tender joints + VAS disease activity participant assessment + VAS disease activity investigator assessment. The maximum score was 334 (66 joints + 68 joints + 100 mm + 100 mm); higher scores indicated higher disease activity. |
Time Frame | Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population; only participants with values for CDAI at baseline and the respective visit were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Week 1 |
-8.4
(12.1)
|
Week 2 |
-13.3
(12.4)
|
Week 4 |
-15.6
(13.4)
|
Week 8 |
-19.7
(13.2)
|
Week 12 |
-22.4
(13.4)
|
Week 16 |
-22.4
(13.8)
|
Week 20 |
-22.7
(13.3)
|
Week 24 |
-24.2
(12.9)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; Missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks up to week 20 for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
-0.48
(0.60)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; Missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks up to week 20 for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
8.6
(11.1)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Absolute change was defined as the change from baseline to Week 24. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; Missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks up to week 20 for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Physical functioning |
18.4
(24.6)
|
Role physical |
16.5
(21.6)
|
Bodily pain |
25.0
(22.3)
|
General health perception |
11.9
(18.7)
|
Vitality |
18.0
(20.2)
|
Social functioning |
13.8
(27.2)
|
Role emotional |
13.9
(50.1)
|
Mental health |
10.3
(19.1)
|
Title | Participant's Global Assessment of Pain as Assessed by Patient Take Home Form (PTHF) |
---|---|
Description | Participant's were asked to state the worst level of pain felt in the past 24 hours using a 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=no pain and 100=unbearable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their level of pain. Participants were asked to document their response during the first 4 treatment weeks at approximately the same time every day. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, and 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; Missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Baseline |
60.7
(23.1)
|
Week 1 |
48.6
(25.2)
|
Week 2 |
41.9
(25.4)
|
Week 4 |
36.3
(26.7)
|
Change at Week 1 |
-12.0
(22.3)
|
Change at Week 2 |
-18.7
(24.9)
|
Change at Week 4 |
-24.4
(27.4)
|
Title | Duration of Morning Stiffness as Assessed Using PTHF |
---|---|
Description | Duration of morning stiffness: participants were asked 'how long did your morning stiffness last from the time you woke up yesterday' and the response was provided in minutes and hours. Participants were asked to document their response during the first 4 treatment weeks at approximately the same time every day. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, and 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; Missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Baseline |
2.4
(2.8)
|
Week 1 |
1.8
(2.3)
|
Week 2 |
1.5
(1.8)
|
Week 4 |
1.2
(1.5)
|
Change at Week 1 |
-0.6
(1.8)
|
Change at Week 2 |
-0.9
(2.1)
|
Change at Week 4 |
-1.2
(2.3)
|
Title | Participant Assessment of Fatigue/Tiredness as Assessed Using PTHF |
---|---|
Description | Participants were asked to assess their overall level of fatigue/tiredness during the previous 24 hours using a 100-mm horizontal VAS with 0=none and 100=very severe. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of fatigue. Participants were asked to document their response during the first 4 treatment weeks at approximately the same time every day. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Weeks 1, 2 and 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; Missing data were imputed using LOCF. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Baseline |
52.9
(26.9)
|
Week 1 |
42.2
(26.2)
|
Week 2 |
36.3
(26.5)
|
Week 4 |
30.6
(26.0)
|
Change at Week 1 |
-10.6
(22.0)
|
Change at Week 2 |
-16.6
(24.1)
|
Change at Week 4 |
-22.2
(26.5)
|
Title | Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Score |
---|---|
Description | The TSQM is a general measure of participants treatment satisfaction and consists of 14 questions that result in 4 subscales: "effectiveness", "side-effects", "convenience" and "global satisfaction". All subscale scores range from 0 to 100%, with 100% being the best possible result. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Percent Effectiveness |
69.4
(28.3)
|
Percent Side-effects |
88.7
(21.7)
|
Percent Convenience |
72.4
(20.8)
|
Percent Global satisfaction |
74.7
(25.9)
|
Title | Changes in Hemoglobin |
---|---|
Description | Hemoglobin levels were determined as a hematology parameter to measure changes in disease related anemia. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks up to week 20 for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Baseline |
128.6
(13.1)
|
Week 1 |
132.2
(13.4)
|
Week 2 |
133.5
(13.1)
|
Week 4 |
133.5
(13.6)
|
Week 24 |
136.1
(13.7)
|
Change at Week 1 |
3.5
(6.8)
|
Change at Week 2 |
4.8
(6.5)
|
Change at Week 4 |
4.3
(8.0)
|
Change at Week 24 |
7.5
(9.7)
|
Title | Changes in C-Reactive Protein |
---|---|
Description | CRP is an acute phase inflammatory marker used as a measure of inflammation. A reduction in CRP is considered to be an improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Weeks 1, 2 ,4 and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Baseline |
23.1
(30.7)
|
Week 1 |
3.5
(6.6)
|
Week 2 |
2.4
(4.4)
|
Week 4 |
5.5
(14.8)
|
Week 24 |
3.0
(7.7)
|
Change at Week 1 |
-19.6
(29.4)
|
Change at Week 2 |
-20.7
(29.8)
|
Change at Week 4 |
-17.5
(27.7)
|
Change at Week 24 |
-20.1
(29.9)
|
Title | Changes in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) |
---|---|
Description | ESR is an inflammation marker used to determine acute phase response. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 286 |
Baseline |
37.4
(22.1)
|
Week 1 |
16.7
(14.2)
|
Week 2 |
10.6
(11.0)
|
Week 4 |
10.3
(13.5)
|
Week 24 |
7.1
(9.5)
|
Change at Week 1 |
-20.6
(17.9)
|
Change at Week 2 |
-26.7
(19.0)
|
Change at Week 4 |
-27.2
(18.6)
|
Change at Week 24 |
-30.3
(21.7)
|
Title | Percentage of Participants Withdrawing From Study Treatment Because of Insufficient Therapeutic Response |
---|---|
Description | Participants who withdrew from study drug due to other reasons were not taken into account. |
Time Frame | Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population; participants who withdrew from study drug due to other reaasons were not included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8mg /kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. |
Measure Participants | 249 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
4.0
1.4%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse events were reported throughout the study including any reactions that occurred within 24 hours after infusion. | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. | |
Arm/Group Title | Tocilizumab | |
Arm/Group Description | Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Tocilizumab | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Tocilizumab | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 32/286 (11.2%) | |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||
Vertigo | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Endocrine disorders | ||
Hypothyroidism | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Periodontitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Vomiting | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
General disorders | ||
General physical health deterioration | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Chest pain | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Infections and infestations | ||
Pneumonia | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Abscess jaw | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Bronchopneumonia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Herpes zoster | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Osteomyelitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Pharyngeal abscess | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Postoperative wound infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Septic shock | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Lower limb fracture | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Overdose | 8/286 (2.8%) | |
Investigations | ||
Low density lipoprotein increased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Bursitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tendonitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Back pain | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Rheumatoid arthritis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Multiple sclerosis relapse | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Headache | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | ||
Abortion | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Psychiatric disorders | ||
Post-traumatic stress disorder | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||
Renal failure acute | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||
Interstitial lung disease | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Tocilizumab | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 242/286 (84.6%) | |
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||
Eosinophilia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Haemolysis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Intravascular haemolysis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Leukopenia | 19/286 (6.6%) | |
Neutropenia | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Thrombocytopenia | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Cardiac disorders | ||
Extrasystoles | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Palpitations | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Tachyarrhythmia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||
Ear pain | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tinnitus | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Vertigo | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Endocrine disorders | ||
Cushingoid | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Goitre | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Hypothyroidism | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Eye disorders | ||
Conjunctival haemorrhage | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Conjunctivitis | 6/286 (2.1%) | |
Dry eye | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Eye inflammation | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Eyelid oedema | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Visual acuity reduced | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Abdominal discomfort | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Abdominal distension | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Abdominal pain | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Abdominal pain upper | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Aphthous stomatitis | 3/286 (1%) | |
Constipation | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Dental caries | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Diarrhoea | 16/286 (5.6%) | |
Diarrhoea haemorrhagic | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Dry mouth | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Dyspepsia | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Enteritis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Eructation | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Flatulence | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Gastric ulcer | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Gastritis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Gingival bleeding | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Gingival erythema | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Loose tooth | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Nausea | 9/286 (3.1%) | |
Periodontitis | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Stomatitis | 3/286 (1%) | |
Toothache | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Vomiting | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
General disorders | ||
Chest pain | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Chills | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Discomfort | 3/286 (1%) | |
Drug intolerance | 3/286 (1%) | |
Fatigue | 13/286 (4.5%) | |
General physical health deterioration | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Local swelling | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Malaise | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Mucosal inflammation | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Oedema | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Oedema peripheral | 6/286 (2.1%) | |
Pitting oedema | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Thirst | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||
Hepatotoxicity | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Immune system disorders | ||
Food allergy | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Hypersensitivity | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Seasonal allergy | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Infections and infestations | ||
Abscess jaw | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Abscess limb | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Acute tonsillitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Anal abscess | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Bacterial disease carrier | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Bacteriuria | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Bronchitis | 16/286 (5.6%) | |
Bronchopneumonia | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Cellulitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Cystitis | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Eyelid infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Folliculitis | 3/286 (1%) | |
Fungal skin infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Furuncle | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Gastroenteritis | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Gastrointestinal infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Herpes simplex | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Herpes virus infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Herpes zoster | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Herpes zoster ophthalmic | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Influenza | 3/286 (1%) | |
Lower respiratory tract infection viral | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Nasopharyngitis | 54/286 (18.9%) | |
Onychomycosis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Oral herpes | 6/286 (2.1%) | |
Osteomyelitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Otitis media | 3/286 (1%) | |
Paronychia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Parotitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Peritonsillar abscess | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Pharyngeal abscess | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Pharyngitis | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Pneumonia | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Post procedural infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Postoperative wound infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Prostate infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Pulpitis dental | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Respiratory tract infection | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Rhinitis | 15/286 (5.2%) | |
Septic shock | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Sinobronchitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Sinusitis | 8/286 (2.8%) | |
Skin bacterial infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tinea pedis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tinea versicolour | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tonsillitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tooth abscess | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Tooth infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tracheobronchitis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 9/286 (3.1%) | |
Upper respiratory tract infection bacterial | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Urethritis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Urinary tract infection | 15/286 (5.2%) | |
Urinary tract infection bacterial | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Vaginal infection | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Viral infection | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Vulvitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection | 3/286 (1%) | |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Contusion | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Excoriation | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Fall | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Foot fracture | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Humerus fracture | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Joint sprain | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Lower limb fracture | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Meniscus lesion | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Nail injury | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Overdose | 8/286 (2.8%) | |
Radius fracture | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Skeletal injury | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tendon rupture | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Wound | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Wrist fracture | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Investigations | ||
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 24/286 (8.4%) | |
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 14/286 (4.9%) | |
Basophil count increased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Blood bilirubin increased | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Blood cholesterol increased | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Blood creatinine increased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Blood triglycerides increased | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Blood uric acid increased | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Body temperature increased | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Haematocrit increased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Haemoglobin increased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Hepatic enzyme increased | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Low density lipoprotein increased | 79/286 (27.6%) | |
Lymphocyte count increased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Neutrophil count decreased | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Transaminases increased | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Weight decreased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Weight increased | 7/286 (2.4%) | |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||
Anorexia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Hypercholesterolaemia | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Hyperglycaemia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Hyperlipidaemia | 6/286 (2.1%) | |
Hyperureicaemia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Hypokalaemia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
Arthralgia | 8/286 (2.8%) | |
Arthritis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Back pain | 9/286 (3.1%) | |
Bursitis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Facit joint syndrome | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Groin pain | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Haemarthrosis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Intervertebral disc protrusion | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Jaw cyst | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Joint range of motion decreased | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Ligament disorder | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Muscle spasms | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Muscle tightness | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Musculoskeletal pain | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Myalgia | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Osteoarthritis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Osteoporosis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Pain in extremity | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Rheumatoid arthritis | 25/286 (8.7%) | |
Sacroiliitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Synovial cyst | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tendonitis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tenosynovitis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Tenosynovitis stenosans | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||
Benign bone neoplasm | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Uterine leiomyoma | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Aphasia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Carpal tunnel syndrome | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Cervicobrachial syndrome | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Dizziness | 3/286 (1%) | |
Dysaesthesia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Dysgeusia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Facial neuralgia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Headache | 27/286 (9.4%) | |
Migraine | 4/286 (1.4%) | |
Multiple sclerosis relapse | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Paraesthesia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Restless legs syndrome | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Sciatica | 3/286 (1%) | |
Somnolence | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Synope | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Tremor | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | ||
Abortion | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Psychiatric disorders | ||
Depression | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Food aversion | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Insomnia | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Mood altered | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Post-traumatic stress disorder | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Sleep disorder | 3/286 (1%) | |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||
Haematuria | 3/286 (1%) | |
Leukocyturia | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Nocturia | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Renal failure acute | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Urethral stenosis | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||
Breast disorder | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Breast pain | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Genital cyst | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Menopausal symptoms | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Vulvovaginal dryness | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||
Allergic cough | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Asthma | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Cough | 9/286 (3.1%) | |
Dysphonia | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Dyspnoea | 3/286 (1%) | |
Dyspnoea exertional | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Epistaxis | 3/286 (1%) | |
Interstitial lung disease | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Nasal dryness | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Nasal mucosal disorder | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Oropharyngeal blistering | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Oropharyngeal pain | 3/286 (1%) | |
Pleurisy | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Rales | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Rhinitis allergic | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Rhinorrhoea | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||
Acne | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Alopecia | 5/286 (1.7%) | |
Blister | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Dermatitis allergic | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Drug eruption | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Dry skin | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Eczema | 8/286 (2.8%) | |
Erythema | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Hyperhidrosis | 3/286 (1%) | |
Pruritus | 7/286 (2.4%) | |
Pruritus generalised | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Psoriasis | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Rash | 3/286 (1%) | |
Rash macular | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Rash pruritic | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Skin chapped | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Skin exfoliation | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Skin fissures | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Skin irritation | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Skin reaction | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Skin ulcer | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Urticaria | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Vascular disorders | ||
Haematoma | 2/286 (0.7%) | |
Hypertension | 16/286 (5.6%) | |
Lymphoedema | 1/286 (0.3%) | |
Thrombosis | 1/286 (0.3%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The study being conducted under this agreement is part of the overall study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the study, but after the first publication or presentation that involves the overall study. Sponsor may request that confidential information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Medical Communications |
---|---|
Organization | Hoffmann- LaRoche |
Phone | 800-821-8590 |
genentech@druginfo.com |
- ML21469
- 2008-000105-11