Remission and Joint Damage Progression in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00122382
Collaborator
(none)
1,052
89
2
43.1
11.8
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a world wide study to evaluate the remission and joint damage in subjects treated with abatacept in addition to methotrexate versus subjects who receive methotrexate along with a placebo.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1052 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase IIIB Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Remission and Joint Damage Progression in Methotrexate Naive Early Erosive RA Subjects Treated With Abatacept Plus Methotrexate Compared With Methotrexate
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2005
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: ABA + MTX

abatacept 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV) + methotrexate

Drug: Abatacept
abatacept 10 mg/kg IV monthly, methotrexate weekly, for 24 months

Drug: methotrexate
Oral, titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24

Active Comparator: Placebo (PLA) + MTX

placebo IV + methotrexate

Drug: Abatacept
abatacept 10 mg/kg IV monthly, methotrexate weekly, for 24 months

Drug: placebo
placebo IV, monthly, methotrexate weekly for 12 months followed by abatacept 10 mg/kg IV monthly, methotrexate weekly for 12 months

Drug: methotrexate
Oral, titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants in DAS 28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Remission at Month 12 [Month 12]

    Number of participants who achieved remission at Month 12 of treatment, as defined by a Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP score of <2.6. DAS 28-CRP is a continuous measure, a composite of 4 variables: number of tender joints out of 28 joints, number of swollen joints out of 28 joints, CRP (in mg/L), and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 millimeters (mm). The DAS28 scale=0 (best) to 10 (worst), indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis. A DAS28 >5.1 = high disease activity; <=3.2 = low disease activity; <2.6 = remission.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total Score to Month 12 [Baseline, Month 12]

    To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and joint space narrowing (JSN). The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.

  3. Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs During the Open-Label Period [Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.]

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE/SAE=Certain, Probable, Possible, or Missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

  4. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Reported During the Open-Label Period [Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.]

    SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

  5. Number of Participants With SAEs With an Outcome of Death During the Open-label Period [Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.]

    Any untoward medical occurrence (SAE) that resulted in death

  6. Incidence Rates of Autoimmune Disorders in ABA-Treated Participants [Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).]

    The incidence rates of autoimmune disorders are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event/exposure within the period)*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.

  7. Incidence Rates of Infections and Infestations of Adverse Events in ABA-Treated Participants [Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).]

    The incidence rates of infections and infestations are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event /exposure within the period)*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.

  8. Incidence Rates of Malignant Neoplasm Adverse Events in ABA-Treated Participants [Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).]

    The incidence rates of malignant neoplasms are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event /exposure within the period)*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.

  9. Number of Participants With a Serious Acute-Infusional AE of Anaphylactic Shock During Open-Label Period [Open-Label Period (Month 12 to Month 24)]

    There were 107 Prespecified, acute-infusional SAEs (occurring within 1 hour after the start of study drug infusion) pre-specified in the protocol; anaphylactic shock was the only one occuring in this study.

  10. Number of Participants With Select Blood Chemistry Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Open-Label Period [Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.]

    Number of subjects with high liver function and kinedy tests: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >2x upper limit of normal (ULN) or if pretreatment (PRE-RX) >ULN then >3x PRE-RX; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3x ULN or if PRE-RX >ULN then >4x PRE-RX; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3x ULN or if PRE-RX >ULN then >4x PRE-RX; g-glutamyl transferase (GGT)>2x ULN or if PRE-RX >ULN then >3x PRE-RX; total bilirubin >2x ULN or if PRE-RX >ULN then >4x PRE-RX; blood urea nitrogen >2x PRE-RX; creatinine >1.5x PRE-RX.

  11. Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Open-Label Period [Continuously from start of open-label period up to 56 days post the last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.]

    Marked abnormalities in hemoglobin >3 g/dL decrease from PRE-RX; hematocrit <0.75x PRE-RX; erythrocytes <0.75x PRE-RX; platelet count <0.67x lower limit of normal (LLN) or >1.5x ULN or if PRE-RX <LLN then <0.5x PRE-RX and <100,000/mm3; leukocytes <0.75x LLN or >1.25x ULN or if PRE-RX <LLN then <0.8x PRE-RX or >ULN if PRE-RX >ULN then >1.2x PRE-RX or <LLN; neutrophils if value <1.00 x10^3 c/uL; lymphocytes if value <.750 x10^3 c/uL or if value >7.50 x10^3 c/uL; monocytes if value >2000/MM3; basophils if value >400/mm3; eosinophils if value >.750 x10^3 c/uL

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Month 12 [Month 12]

    ACR 50 response was defined as a 50% improvement from baseline to Month 12 in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (subject global assessment of pain, subject global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, subject assessment of physical function), and 1 acute phase reactant value [ie, CRP].

  2. Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response (MCR) at Month 12 [Month 12]

    MCR was defined as 6 months of consecutive ACR 70 response at Month 12. ACR 70, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition of 70% improvement was based on a 70% improvement (compared to baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (subject global assessment of pain, subject global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, subject assessment of physical function, and 1 acute phase reactant value [ie, CRP]).

  3. Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in DAS-28-CRP Score to Month 12 [Baseline, Month 12]

    DAS 28-CRP is a continuous variable that is a composite of 4 variables: the number of tender joints out of 28 joints, the number of swollen joints out of 28 joints, CRP in milligrams/Liter (mg/L), and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 millimeters (mm). The DAS28 scale=0 to 10, indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis. A DAS28 >5.1=high disease activity; <3.2=low disease activity; <2.6=remission. Change from Baseline=Post-baseline - Baseline value; Adjusted for baseline value.

  4. Number of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response at Month 12 [Month 12]

    Physical function was evaluated using the HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI), a questionnaire with 20 questions assessing function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. The 8 category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. HAQ response=improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline.

  5. Adjusted Mean Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline, Month 12]

    The SF-36 covers 8 health dimensions: 4 physical subscales (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and 4 mental subscales (vitality, social function, role-emotional, and mental health). The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Two summary scores (physical and mental component summaries) were produced taking a weighted linear combination of the 8 individual subscales. Change from Baseline=Post-baseline - Baseline value; adjusted for baseline value.

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Scores to Month 12 [Baseline, Month 12]

    To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The erosion score range is 0 (no radiographic damage) to 145 (worst possible radiographic damage). The joint space narrowing score range is 0 (no radiographic damage) to 145 (worst possible radiographic damage). Higher scores indicated more damage. Change from baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value

  7. Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses in the Double-blind Period as Analyzed by Enzyme-linked-immunosorbent Serologic Assay (ELISA) [includes data up to approximately 85 days past the last dose of the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.]

    Serum samples were analyzed by ELISA to detect antibodies against the whole molecule (both CTLA4 and Ig [anti-abatacept antibody]) or solely to CTLA4 (anti-CTLA4-T antibody). Reported as titer, the reciprocal of the sample dilution which yielded a signal equivalent to the statistically set cut point for the assay. For the anti-abatacept assay, minimum required dilution is 400-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those < lowest reportable titer (<400). For the anti-CTLA4-T assay, minimum required dilution is 25-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those < lowest reportable titer (<25).

  8. Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses During the Open-Label Period (From Month 12 to Month 24) as Analyzed by ELISA [Includes open-label data up to approximately 85 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.]

    Serum samples were analyzed by ELISA to detect antibodies against the whole molecule (both CTLA4 and Ig [anti-abatacept antibody]) or solely to CTLA4 (anti-CTLA4-T antibody). Reported as titer, the reciprocal of the sample dilution which yielded a signal equivalent to the statistically set cut point for the assay. For the anti-abatacept assay, minimum required dilution is 400-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those < lowest reportable titer (<400). For the anti-CTLA4-T assay, minimum required dilution is 25-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those < lowest reportable titer (<25).

  9. Number of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response at Month 24 [Baseline, Month 24]

    Physical function was evaluated using the HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI), a questionnaire with 20 questions assessing function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. The 8 category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. HAQ response=improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline.

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total, Erosion and JSN Scores to Month 24 [Baseline, Month 24]

    To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage. Change from baseline = Postbaseline - baseline value.

  11. Number of Participants Without Radiographic Progression (as Measured by in Erosion Scores, JSN Scores, and Total Scores) From Baseline at Month 24 [Baseline, Month 24]

    Participants with no radiographic progression (defined as change in score <=0 or <=0.5), from baseline to Month 24. To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.

  12. Number of Participants Without Radiographic Progression (as Measured by in Erosion Scores, JSN Scores, and Total Scores) at Month 24 in Participants Without Progression at Month 12 [Month 12, Month 24]

    Participants with no radiographic progression ((defined as change in score <=0 or <=0.5), sustained from Month 12 and Month 24. To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.

  13. Mean Difference Observed in Change From Baseline to Month 12 and Between Month 12 and Month 24 in Radiographic Scores (Total Score) [Baseline, Month 12, Month 24]

    Mean difference observed in change from baseline to Month 12 and between Month 12 and Month 24 in radiographic scores (Total Score). To assess joint damage, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.

  14. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Reported During the Double-blind Period [Includes data up to 56 days post the last dose in the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.]

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE/SAE=Certain, Probable, Possible, or Missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

  15. Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Double-blind Period [Includes data up to 56 days post the last dose in the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.]

    Number of participants with laboratory values (hematology, liver and kidney functions, electrolytes, glucose tests, protein tests, metabolite tests, and urine chemistry tests) considered markedly abnormal according to prespecified protocol criteria

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) <=2 years; MTX naive or <=10 mg/wk for <=3 weeks. No dose within 3 months prior to informed consent.

  • C-Reactive Protein (CRP) >= 4.5 mg/L (after amendment)

  • Rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) positive

  • Tender joints >=12 and swollen joints >=10

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Women and men who are not willing to use birth control

  • Diagnosed with other rheumatic disease

  • History of cancer within 5 years

  • Active tuberculosis

  • Treatment with another investigation drug within 28 days

  • Active bacterial or viral infection

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Rheumatology Associates Of North Alabama Huntsville Alabama United States 35801
2 Talbert Medical Group Huntington Beach California United States 92646
3 Arthritis Assoc And Osteo Ctr Of Col Sprgs Colorado Springs Colorado United States 80910
4 New England Research Associates, Llc Trumbull Connecticut United States 06611
5 Diagnostic Rheumatology And Research Indianapolis Indiana United States 46227
6 Osteoporosis And Clinical Trials Center Cumberland Maryland United States 21502
7 Malamet & Klein, Md, Pa Hagerstown Maryland United States 21740
8 Arthritis Center Of Nebraska Lincoln Nebraska United States 68516
9 Regional Rheumatology Associates Binghamton New York United States 13905
10 Carolina Bone & Joint Charlotte North Carolina United States 28210
11 Physicians East, Pa Greenville North Carolina United States 27834
12 Carolina Pharmaceutical Research Statesville North Carolina United States 28625
13 Lion Research Norman Oklahoma United States 73071
14 Health Research Of Oklahoma Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73103
15 Lynn Health Sciences Institute Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73112
16 Altoona Center For Clinical Research Duncansville Pennsylvania United States 16635
17 Low Country Research Center Charleston South Carolina United States 29406
18 Walter F Chase Md Pa Austin Texas United States 78705
19 Arthritis Clinic Of Northern Virginia, P.C. Arlington Virginia United States 22205
20 Local Institution Malvern Victoria Australia 3144
21 Local Institution Shenton Park Western Australia Australia 6008
22 Local Institution Antwerpen Belgium 2020
23 Local Institution Bruxelles Belgium 1070
24 Local Institution Bruxelles Belgium 1200
25 Local Institution Hasselt Belgium 3500
26 Local Institution Leuven Belgium 3000
27 Local Institution Goiania Goias Brazil 74043
28 Local Institution Curitiba Parana Brazil 80060
29 Local Institution Rio De Janeiro - Rj Rio De Janeiro Brazil 20551
30 Local Institution Porto Alegre Rio Grande Do Sul Brazil 91610
31 Local Institution Sao Paulo Brazil 04039
32 Local Institution Sao Paulo Brazil 04230
33 Local Institution St. John'S Newfoundland and Labrador Canada A1B 3E1
34 Local Institution Kitchener Ontario Canada N2M 5N6
35 Local Institution Toronto Ontario Canada M5G 1X5
36 Local Institution Montreal Quebec Canada H2L 1S6
37 Local Institution Sherbrooke Quebec Canada J1H 5N4
38 Local Institution Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada S7N 0W8
39 Local Institution Quebec Canada G1V 3M7
40 Local Institution Prague 2 Czech Republic 128 50
41 Local Institution Dijon France 21000
42 Local Institution Montpellier Cedex 5 France 34295
43 Local Institution Nice Cedex 03 France 06202
44 Local Institution Strasbourg Cedex France 67098
45 Local Institution Berlin Germany 14059
46 Local Institution Hamburg Germany 22081
47 Local Institution Leipzig Germany 04103
48 Local Institution Leipzig Germany 04229
49 Local Institution Jesi(Ancona) Italy 60055
50 Local Institution Milano Italy 20157
51 Local Institution Anyang Korea, Republic of 431-070
52 Local Institution Daegu Korea, Republic of 705-718
53 Local Institution Daejeon Korea, Republic of 302-799
54 Local Institution Seoul Korea, Republic of 110-744
55 Local Institution Seoul Korea, Republic of 133-792
56 Local Institution Seoul Korea, Republic of 137-040
57 Local Institution Seoul Korea, Republic of 138-736
58 Local Institution D.f. Distrito Federal Mexico 06700
59 Local Institution Metepec Estado De Mexico Mexico 52140
60 Local Institution Leon Guanajuato Mexico 37000
61 Local Institution Guadalajara Jalisco Mexico 42650
62 Local Institution Guadalajara Jalisco Mexico 44340
63 Local Institution Guadalajara Jalisco Mexico 44690
64 Local Institution Morelia Michioacan Mexico 58000
65 Local Institution Cuernavaca Morelos Mexico 62270
66 Local Institution Monterrey Nuevo Leon Mexico 64020
67 Local Institution Chihuahua Mexico 31000
68 Local Institution San Luis Potosi Mexico 78240
69 Local Institution Amsterdam Netherlands 1081 HV
70 Local Institution Leiden Netherlands 2300 RC
71 Local Institution Nijmegen Netherlands 6500 HB
72 Local Institution Poznan Poland 60773
73 Local Institution Poznan Poland 61-545
74 Local Institution Warszawa Poland 02-637
75 Local Institution Ponce Puerto Rico 00716
76 Local Institution Moscow Russian Federation 115522
77 Local Institution Moscow Russian Federation 119049
78 Local Institution Bloemfontein Free State South Africa 9317
79 Local Institution Muckleneuk Gauteng South Africa 0002
80 Local Institution Pretoria Gauteng South Africa 0084
81 Local Institution Berea Kwa Zulu Natal South Africa 4001
82 Local Institution Panorama Western Cape South Africa 7506
83 Local Institution A Coruna Spain 15706
84 Local Institution Santander Spain 39008
85 Local Institution Sevilla Spain 41071
86 Local Institution Manchester Greater Manchester United Kingdom M13 9WL
87 Local Institution Glasgow Lanarkshire United Kingdom G12 0YN
88 Local Institution Leeds North Yorkshire United Kingdom LS7 4SA
89 Local Institution Newcastle Northumberland United Kingdom NE1 4LP

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bristol-Myers Squibb

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00122382
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IM101-023
First Posted:
Jul 22, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Nov 16, 2010
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2010
Keywords provided by , ,
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail 1052 participants were enrolled, 541 were not randomized (2 for adverse events, 32 subjects withdrew consent, 1 pregnancy, 6 lost to follow-up, 470 no longer met study criteria, 30 for other reasons).
Arm/Group Title Abatacept (ABA) + Methotrexate (MTX) (Double-Blind) Placebo (PLA) + Methotrexate (MTX) (Double-Blind) ABA + MTX (Open-Label)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12 (end of double blind period). Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX) titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12 (end of double blind period). Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with weekly oral MTX were administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Period Title: Double-Blind Study
STARTED 256 255 0
Treated 256 253 0
COMPLETED 232 227 0
NOT COMPLETED 24 28 0
Period Title: Double-Blind Study
STARTED 0 0 459
COMPLETED 0 0 433
NOT COMPLETED 0 0 26

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind) Total
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 256 253 509
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
50.1
(12.4)
49.7
(13.0)
49.9
(12.7)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
196
76.6%
199
78.7%
395
77.6%
Male
60
23.4%
54
21.3%
114
22.4%
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide 2 (CCP2) Status (participants) [Number]
unknown
2
0.8%
0
0%
2
0.4%
positive
236
92.2%
217
85.8%
453
89%
negative
18
7%
36
14.2%
54
10.6%
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Disease (participants) [Number]
</= 6 months
167
65.2%
157
62.1%
324
63.7%
> 6 months - 12 months
36
14.1%
34
13.4%
70
13.8%
> 12 months
53
20.7%
62
24.5%
115
22.6%
Rheumatoid Factor (RF) Status (participants) [Number]
unknown
1
0.4%
1
0.4%
2
0.4%
positive
246
96.1%
245
96.8%
491
96.5%
negative
9
3.5%
7
2.8%
16
3.1%
Disease Activity Scale 28 (DAS 28) C-reactive Protein (CRP) (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
6.3
(1.0)
6.2
(1.0)
6.3
(1.0)
Duration of RA (months) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [months]
6.2
(7.5)
6.7
(7.1)
6.5
(7.3)
Erosion Score (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
5.4
(6.1)
4.8
(5.4)
5.1
(5.8)
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
1.7
(0.7)
1.7
(0.7)
1.7
(0.7)
Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
2.1
(4.2)
1.9
(4.0)
2.0
(4.1)
Physician Global Assessment per Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (mm) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm]
67.1
(18.2)
65.7
(18.9)
66.4
(18.5)
Subject Global Assessment per VAS (mm) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm]
65.8
(21.8)
63.7
(24.0)
64.8
(22.9)
Subject Pain Assessment per VAS (mm) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm]
66.6
(22.5)
67.1
(22.6)
66.8
(22.5)
Swollen Joints (number of swollen joints) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [number of swollen joints]
22.9
(11.3)
21.9
(10.1)
22.4
(10.8)
Tender Joints (number of tender joints) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [number of tender joints]
31.3
(14.8)
30.8
(14.0)
31.0
(14.4)
Total Genant-modified Sharp score (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
7.5
(9.7)
6.7
(8.8)
7.1
(9.2)

Outcome Measures

1. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Month 12
Description ACR 50 response was defined as a 50% improvement from baseline to Month 12 in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (subject global assessment of pain, subject global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, subject assessment of physical function), and 1 acute phase reactant value [ie, CRP].
Time Frame Month 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Intention-to-Treat=All randomized and treated; all missing data subsequent to discontinuation are considered non-responders.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 256 253
Number [participants]
147
57.4%
107
42.3%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments Estimated Difference between ABA and PLA is the estimated difference between ABA and PLA in the proportion of subjects achieving an ACR 50 response.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments p-value of <0.05: probability for testing the difference between ABA and PLA.
Method Chi-squared, Continuity-Corrected
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Estimated Difference between ABA and PLA
Estimated Value 15.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
6.0 to 24.2
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response (MCR) at Month 12
Description MCR was defined as 6 months of consecutive ACR 70 response at Month 12. ACR 70, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition of 70% improvement was based on a 70% improvement (compared to baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (subject global assessment of pain, subject global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, subject assessment of physical function, and 1 acute phase reactant value [ie, CRP]).
Time Frame Month 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Intention-to-Treat=All randomized and treated; all missing data subsequent to discontinuation are considered non-responders.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 256 253
Number [participants]
70
27.3%
30
11.9%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments Estimated Difference between ABA and PLA is the estimated difference between ABA and PLA in the proportion of subjects achieving MCR.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments p-value of <0.05: probability for testing the difference between ABA and PLA.
Method Chi-squared, Continuity-Corrected
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Estimated Difference between ABA and PLA
Estimated Value 15.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
8.2 to 22.8
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in DAS-28-CRP Score to Month 12
Description DAS 28-CRP is a continuous variable that is a composite of 4 variables: the number of tender joints out of 28 joints, the number of swollen joints out of 28 joints, CRP in milligrams/Liter (mg/L), and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 millimeters (mm). The DAS28 scale=0 to 10, indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis. A DAS28 >5.1=high disease activity; <3.2=low disease activity; <2.6=remission. Change from Baseline=Post-baseline - Baseline value; Adjusted for baseline value.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Intent to Treat population = all randomized and treated. As change from baseline analysis, only those with baseline and post-baseline included.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 253 251
Mean (Standard Error) [units in a scale]
-3.22
(0.09)
-2.49
(0.09)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments p-value of <0.05: probability for testing the difference between ABA and PLA.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Adjustment based on ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline value as covariate.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Estimate of/Adjusted Difference
Estimated Value -0.73
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.98 to -0.48
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response at Month 12
Description Physical function was evaluated using the HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI), a questionnaire with 20 questions assessing function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. The 8 category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. HAQ response=improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline.
Time Frame Month 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Intention-to-Treat=All randomized and treated; all missing data subsequent to discontinuation are considered non-responders.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 256 253
Number [participants]
184
71.9%
157
62.1%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments Estimated Difference between ABA and PLA is the estimated difference between ABA and PLA in the proportion of subjects achieving HAQ response.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.024
Comments p-value of <0.05: probability for testing the difference between ABA and PLA.
Method Chi-squared, Continuity-Corrected
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Estimated Difference between ABA and PLA
Estimated Value 9.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.3 to 18.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Adjusted Mean Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) From Baseline to Month 12
Description The SF-36 covers 8 health dimensions: 4 physical subscales (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and 4 mental subscales (vitality, social function, role-emotional, and mental health). The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Two summary scores (physical and mental component summaries) were produced taking a weighted linear combination of the 8 individual subscales. Change from Baseline=Post-baseline - Baseline value; adjusted for baseline value.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Intent to Treat population = all randomized and treated. As change from baseline analysis, only those with baseline and post-baseline included.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 254 249
Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score
11.68
(0.62)
9.18
(0.63)
Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score
8.15
(0.64)
6.34
(0.64)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments PCS Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline to Month 12
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.005
Comments p-value of <0.05: probability for testing the difference between ABA and PLA.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Adjustment based on ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline value as covariate.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Estimate of/Adjusted Difference
Estimated Value 2.50
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.77 to 4.23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments MCS Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline to Month 12
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.046
Comments p-value of <0.05: probability for testing the difference between ABA and PLA.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Adjustment based on ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline value as covariate.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Estimate of/Adjusted Difference
Estimated Value 1.81
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.03 to 3.60
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Scores to Month 12
Description To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The erosion score range is 0 (no radiographic damage) to 145 (worst possible radiographic damage). The joint space narrowing score range is 0 (no radiographic damage) to 145 (worst possible radiographic damage). Higher scores indicated more damage. Change from baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Intention-to-Treat - linear extrapolation imputation. Analysis of change from baseline restricts subjects included in to the analysis to those with baseline and post-baseline.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 242 242
Baseline Mean Erosion Score
5.48
(6.15)
4.81
(5.46)
Mean Change from Baseline in Erosion Score
0.50
(1.39)
0.89
(2.24)
Baseline Mean JSN Score
2.03
(3.99)
1.86
(3.95)
Mean Change from Baseline in JSN Score
0.13
(0.53)
0.17
(0.54)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments comparison of change in erosion scores between abatacept and placebo
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.033
Comments P-value of <0.05: probability for comparison of change in radiographic scores between abatacept and placebo.
Method Nonparametric ANCOVA
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments comparison of change in JSN scores between abatacept and placebo
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.353
Comments P-value of <0.05: probability for comparison of change in radiographic scores between abatacept and placebo.
Method Nonparametric ANCOVA
Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses in the Double-blind Period as Analyzed by Enzyme-linked-immunosorbent Serologic Assay (ELISA)
Description Serum samples were analyzed by ELISA to detect antibodies against the whole molecule (both CTLA4 and Ig [anti-abatacept antibody]) or solely to CTLA4 (anti-CTLA4-T antibody). Reported as titer, the reciprocal of the sample dilution which yielded a signal equivalent to the statistically set cut point for the assay. For the anti-abatacept assay, minimum required dilution is 400-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those < lowest reportable titer (<400). For the anti-CTLA4-T assay, minimum required dilution is 25-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those < lowest reportable titer (<25).
Time Frame includes data up to approximately 85 days past the last dose of the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Treated participants in the double-blind period who were evaluated for anti-abatacept or anti-CTLA4-T responses
Arm/Group Title ABA+ MTX On-treatment ABA + MTX Post-discontinuation
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 249 13
Anti-abatacept Responses
3
1.2%
0
0%
Anti-CTLA4-T Responses
1
0.4%
1
0.4%
8. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants in DAS 28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Remission at Month 12
Description Number of participants who achieved remission at Month 12 of treatment, as defined by a Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP score of <2.6. DAS 28-CRP is a continuous measure, a composite of 4 variables: number of tender joints out of 28 joints, number of swollen joints out of 28 joints, CRP (in mg/L), and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 millimeters (mm). The DAS28 scale=0 (best) to 10 (worst), indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis. A DAS28 >5.1 = high disease activity; <=3.2 = low disease activity; <2.6 = remission.
Time Frame Month 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Intent to treat = all randomized and treated subjects. Those with missing data post-discontinuation were considered non-responders.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 256 253
Number [participants]
106
41.4%
59
23.3%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments Estimated Difference between ABA and PLA is the estimated difference between ABA and PLA in the proportion of subjects achieving DAS28-CRP remission.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments Total score was tested only if there was statistical significance in remission rate. For each test, the nominal type I error rate is set at 5%; this sequential testing procedure preserves the overall type I error rate at 5%.
Method Chi-squared, Continuity-Corrected
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Estimated Difference between ABA and PLA
Estimated Value 18.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
9.6 to 26.6
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
9. Primary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total Score to Month 12
Description To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and joint space narrowing (JSN). The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The analysis was intent-to-treat. Because the analysis was change from baseline, only those with baseline and post-baseline were included. Linear extrapolation imputation was applied.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 242 242
Baseline Mean
7.50
(9.52)
6.67
(8.71)
Mean Change from Baseline
0.63
(1.74)
1.06
(2.45)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.040
Comments Total score was tested only if there was statistical significance in remission rate. For each test, the nominal type I error rate is set at 5%; this sequential testing procedure preserves the overall type I error rate at 5%.
Method non-parametric ANCOVA
Comments
10. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs During the Open-Label Period
Description AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE/SAE=Certain, Probable, Possible, or Missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.
Time Frame Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All subjects who received at least 1 dose of ABA in the open-label period were included in the safety analyses.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Open-Label)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 459
AEs
345
134.8%
Related AEs
128
50%
SAEs
29
11.3%
Related SAEs
10
3.9%
Discontinuations due to AEs
11
4.3%
Discontinuations due to SAEs
4
1.6%
Deaths
2
0.8%
11. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Reported During the Open-Label Period
Description SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.
Time Frame Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All subjects who received at least 1 dose of ABA in the open-label period were included in the safety analyses.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Open Label)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 459
Any SAE
29
11.3%
Infections and infestations
8
3.1%
Gastrointestinal disorders
4
1.6%
Nervous system disorders
4
1.6%
Cardiac disorders
3
1.2%
Hepatobiliary disorders
3
1.2%
Eye disorders
2
0.8%
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
2
0.8%
Vascular disorders
2
0.8%
Immune System Disorders
1
0.4%
Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural Complications
1
0.4%
Investigations
1
0.4%
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
1
0.4%
Renal and Urinary Disorders
1
0.4%
Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders
1
0.4%
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses During the Open-Label Period (From Month 12 to Month 24) as Analyzed by ELISA
Description Serum samples were analyzed by ELISA to detect antibodies against the whole molecule (both CTLA4 and Ig [anti-abatacept antibody]) or solely to CTLA4 (anti-CTLA4-T antibody). Reported as titer, the reciprocal of the sample dilution which yielded a signal equivalent to the statistically set cut point for the assay. For the anti-abatacept assay, minimum required dilution is 400-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those < lowest reportable titer (<400). For the anti-CTLA4-T assay, minimum required dilution is 25-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those < lowest reportable titer (<25).
Time Frame Includes open-label data up to approximately 85 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Treated participants in the open-label period were evaluated for anti-abatacept or anti-CTLA4-T responses
Arm/Group Title Anti-Abatacept Antibody Response Anti-CTLA4-T Antibody Response
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 451 456
Number [participants]
13
5.1%
16
6.3%
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response at Month 24
Description Physical function was evaluated using the HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI), a questionnaire with 20 questions assessing function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. The 8 category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. HAQ response=improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All treated participants in the Open-label period. Treatment groups represent treatment received in the Double Blind Period.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period). The groups are determined by treatment status in the double blind period to observe efficacy differences. Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period). The groups are determined by treatment status in the double blind period to observe efficacy differences.
Measure Participants 232 227
Number [participants]
189
73.8%
178
70.4%
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total, Erosion and JSN Scores to Month 24
Description To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage. Change from baseline = Postbaseline - baseline value.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All treated participants in the open-label period. Because the analysis was change from baseline, only those with baseline and post-baseline were included. Linear extrapolation imputation was applied. Treatment groups represent treatment received in the double-blind period.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period). The groups are determined by treatment status in the double blind period to observe efficacy differences. Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period). The groups are determined by treatment status in the double blind period to observe efficacy differences.
Measure Participants 213 192
Erosion Score Baseline Mean
5.91
(6.48)
5.49
(5.85)
Erosion Score Mean Change from Baseline
0.59
(2.31)
1.40
(3.08)
JSN Score Baseline Mean
1.83
(3.82)
1.75
(3.92)
JSN Score Mean Change from Baseline
0.25
(1.03)
0.34
(0.99)
Total Score Baseline Mean
7.73
(9.50)
7.24
(8.89)
Total Score Mean Change from Baseline
0.84
(3.22)
1.75
(3.59)
15. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With SAEs With an Outcome of Death During the Open-label Period
Description Any untoward medical occurrence (SAE) that resulted in death
Time Frame Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All subjects who received at least 1 dose of ABA in the open-label period were included in the safety analyses.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Open-Label)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 459
Pneumonia
1
0.4%
Pneumonia/septic shock
1
0.4%
16. Primary Outcome
Title Incidence Rates of Autoimmune Disorders in ABA-Treated Participants
Description The incidence rates of autoimmune disorders are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event/exposure within the period)*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.
Time Frame Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All subjects who received at least 1 dose of abatacept. Double-blind (DB) period: all treated in DB period; Open-label (OL) Period: all treated in OL period.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) ABA + MTX (Open-Label)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 256 459
Number [Number of participants/100 patient-years]
2.47
1%
1.30
0.5%
17. Primary Outcome
Title Incidence Rates of Infections and Infestations of Adverse Events in ABA-Treated Participants
Description The incidence rates of infections and infestations are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event /exposure within the period)*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.
Time Frame Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All subjects who received at least 1 dose of abatacept. Double-blind (DB) period: all treated in DB period; Open-label (OL) Period: all treated in OL period.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) ABA + MTX (Open-Label)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 256 459
Number [Number of patients/100 patient-years]
78.37
66.68
18. Primary Outcome
Title Incidence Rates of Malignant Neoplasm Adverse Events in ABA-Treated Participants
Description The incidence rates of malignant neoplasms are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event /exposure within the period)*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.
Time Frame Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All subjects who received at least 1 dose of abatacept. Double-blind (DB) period: all treated in DB period; Open-label (OL) Period: all treated in OL period.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) ABA + MTX (Open-Label)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 256 459
Number [number of patients/100 patient-years]
0.81
0
19. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With a Serious Acute-Infusional AE of Anaphylactic Shock During Open-Label Period
Description There were 107 Prespecified, acute-infusional SAEs (occurring within 1 hour after the start of study drug infusion) pre-specified in the protocol; anaphylactic shock was the only one occuring in this study.
Time Frame Open-Label Period (Month 12 to Month 24)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants treated during the Open-Label period.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Open-label)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 459
Number [Participants]
1
0.4%
20. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Select Blood Chemistry Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Open-Label Period
Description Number of subjects with high liver function and kinedy tests: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >2x upper limit of normal (ULN) or if pretreatment (PRE-RX) >ULN then >3x PRE-RX; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3x ULN or if PRE-RX >ULN then >4x PRE-RX; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3x ULN or if PRE-RX >ULN then >4x PRE-RX; g-glutamyl transferase (GGT)>2x ULN or if PRE-RX >ULN then >3x PRE-RX; total bilirubin >2x ULN or if PRE-RX >ULN then >4x PRE-RX; blood urea nitrogen >2x PRE-RX; creatinine >1.5x PRE-RX.
Time Frame Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All Treated participants in the Open-label Period; n=number of participants evaluated for this measure.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Open-Label)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 459
ALP (n=459)
2
0.8%
AST (n=459)
10
3.9%
ALT (n=459)
24
9.4%
GGT (n=459)
15
5.9%
Total Bilirubin (n=459)
0
0%
Blood Urea Nitrogen (n=459)
13
5.1%
Creatinine (n=457)
81
31.6%
21. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Open-Label Period
Description Marked abnormalities in hemoglobin >3 g/dL decrease from PRE-RX; hematocrit <0.75x PRE-RX; erythrocytes <0.75x PRE-RX; platelet count <0.67x lower limit of normal (LLN) or >1.5x ULN or if PRE-RX <LLN then <0.5x PRE-RX and <100,000/mm3; leukocytes <0.75x LLN or >1.25x ULN or if PRE-RX <LLN then <0.8x PRE-RX or >ULN if PRE-RX >ULN then >1.2x PRE-RX or <LLN; neutrophils if value <1.00 x10^3 c/uL; lymphocytes if value <.750 x10^3 c/uL or if value >7.50 x10^3 c/uL; monocytes if value >2000/MM3; basophils if value >400/mm3; eosinophils if value >.750 x10^3 c/uL
Time Frame Continuously from start of open-label period up to 56 days post the last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants treated during the open-label period; n= number of participants evaluated for this measure.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Open-Label)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period).
Measure Participants 459
Low Hemoglobin (n=458)
9
3.5%
Low Hematocrit (n=458)
5
2%
Low Erythrocyte (n=458)
8
3.1%
Low Platelet Count (n=455)
1
0.4%
High Platelet Count (n=455)
1
0.4%
Low Leukocytes (n=458)
14
5.5%
High Leukocytes (n=458)
12
4.7%
Low Neutrophils + Bands (absolute) (n=459)
6
2.3%
Low Lymphocytes (absolute) (n=459)
39
15.2%
High Lymphocytes (absolute) (n=459)
1
0.4%
High Monocytes (absolute) (n=459)
0
0%
High Basophils (absolute) (n=459)
2
0.8%
High Eosinophils (absolute) (n=459)
19
7.4%
22. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants Without Radiographic Progression (as Measured by in Erosion Scores, JSN Scores, and Total Scores) From Baseline at Month 24
Description Participants with no radiographic progression (defined as change in score <=0 or <=0.5), from baseline to Month 24. To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All treated participants in the open-label period. Treatment groups represent treatment received in the double-blind period.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period). The groups are determined by treatment status in the double blind period to observe efficacy differences. Participants who received ABA + MTX in the 12-month, open-label period of the study (including 232 subjects who previously received ABA + MTX and 227 subjects who previously received PLA + MTX in the 12-month, double-blind period of the study). ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week was administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24 (open-label period). The groups are determined by treatment status in the double blind period to observe efficacy differences.
Measure Participants 213 192
Change from Baseline <= 0 in Erosion Score
125
48.8%
92
36.4%
Change from Baseline <= 0.5 in Erosion Score
144
56.3%
114
45.1%
Change from Baseline <= 0 in JSN Score
175
68.4%
150
59.3%
Change from Baseline <= 0.5 in JSN Score
190
74.2%
166
65.6%
Change from Baseline <= 0 in Total Score
121
47.3%
84
33.2%
Change from Baseline <= 0.5 in Total Score
139
54.3%
107
42.3%
23. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants Without Radiographic Progression (as Measured by in Erosion Scores, JSN Scores, and Total Scores) at Month 24 in Participants Without Progression at Month 12
Description Participants with no radiographic progression ((defined as change in score <=0 or <=0.5), sustained from Month 12 and Month 24. To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.
Time Frame Month 12, Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Number of Participants Analyzed=All treated participants in the open-label period. (Treatment groups represent treatment received in the double-blind period.) n=the number of subjects with observed data included in the analysis.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 232 227
Erosion Score Sustained <=0 (n=125; n=100)
116
45.3%
87
34.4%
Erosion Score Sustained <=0.5 (n=145; n=114)
135
52.7%
107
42.3%
JSN Score Sustained <=0 (n=180; n=165)
169
66%
150
59.3%
JSN Score Sustained <=0.5 (n=192; n=177)
185
72.3%
163
64.4%
Total Score sustained <=0 (n=123; n=97)
112
43.8%
81
32%
Total Score sustained <=0.5 (n=144; n=112)
131
51.2%
101
39.9%
24. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Difference Observed in Change From Baseline to Month 12 and Between Month 12 and Month 24 in Radiographic Scores (Total Score)
Description Mean difference observed in change from baseline to Month 12 and between Month 12 and Month 24 in radiographic scores (Total Score). To assess joint damage, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis includes all treated participants in the open-label period originally randomized to abatacept. Analysis includes all participants with observed assessments collected at Baseline (Day 1), Day 365 (Month 12), and Day 729 (Month 24)
Arm/Group Title Year 1 Change Year 2 Change
Arm/Group Description Year 1 Change = Day 365 - Day 1 Year 2 Change = Day 729 (Month 24) - Day 365 (Month 12)
Measure Participants 207 207
Mean (Standard Error) [units on a scale]
0.66
(0.13)
0.18
(0.13)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ABA + MTX (Double-Blind), PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments
Method signed rank test
Comments
25. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Reported During the Double-blind Period
Description AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE/SAE=Certain, Probable, Possible, or Missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.
Time Frame Includes data up to 56 days post the last dose in the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All treated participants in the Double-Blind period
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 256 253
Deaths
2
0.8%
4
1.6%
SAEs
20
7.8%
20
7.9%
Related SAEs
5
2%
6
2.4%
Discontinued due to SAEs
3
1.2%
3
1.2%
AEs
217
84.8%
211
83.4%
Related AEs
98
38.3%
114
45.1%
Discontinued due to AEs
8
3.1%
11
4.3%
26. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Double-blind Period
Description Number of participants with laboratory values (hematology, liver and kidney functions, electrolytes, glucose tests, protein tests, metabolite tests, and urine chemistry tests) considered markedly abnormal according to prespecified protocol criteria
Time Frame Includes data up to 56 days post the last dose in the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All treated in the DB period. n=Number of participants evaluated for this measure.
Arm/Group Title ABA + MTX (Double-Blind) PLA + MTX (Double-Blind)
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
Measure Participants 256 253
Low Hemoglobin (n=254; n=251)
3
1.2%
3
1.2%
Low Hematocrit (n=254; n=250)
1
0.4%
2
0.8%
Low Erythrocytes (n=254; n=250)
1
0.4%
4
1.6%
Low Platelet Count (n=252; n=250)
0
0%
1
0.4%
High Platelet Count (n=252; n=250)
1
0.4%
3
1.2%
Low Leukocytes (n=254; n=251)
5
2%
11
4.3%
High Leukocytes (n=254; n=251)
5
2%
14
5.5%
Low Neutrophils + Bands (absolute) (n=254; n=252)
2
0.8%
5
2%
Low Lymphocytes (absolute) (n=254; n=252)
13
5.1%
29
11.5%
High Lymphocytes (absolute) (n=254; n=252)
0
0%
0
0%
High Monocytes (absolute) (n=254; n=252)
1
0.4%
1
0.4%
High Basophils (absolute) (n=254; n=252)
0
0%
0
0%
High Eosinophils (absolute) (n=254; n=252)
7
2.7%
13
5.1%
High Alkaline Phosphatase (n=254; n=253)
1
0.4%
0
0%
High Aspartate Aminotransferase (n=254; n=253)
7
2.7%
14
5.5%
High Alanine Aminotransferase (n=254; n=253)
15
5.9%
21
8.3%
G-Glutamyl Transferase (n=254; n=253)
11
4.3%
9
3.6%
High Bilirubin, Total (n=254; n=253)
0
0%
2
0.8%
High Blood Urea Nitrogen (n=254; n=253)
9
3.5%
10
4%
High Creatinine (n=254; n=251)
33
12.9%
32
12.6%
Low Sodium, Serum (n=254; n=253)
0
0%
1
0.4%
High Sodium, Serum (n=254; n=253)
2
0.8%
0
0%
Low Potassium, Serum (n=254; n=251)
6
2.3%
3
1.2%
High Potassium, Serum (n=254; n=251)
3
1.2%
2
0.8%
Low Chloride, Serum (n=254; n=253)
0
0%
0
0%
High Chloride, Serum (n=254; n=253)
1
0.4%
0
0%
Low Calcium, Total (n=254; n=253)
0
0%
0
0%
High Calcium, Total (n=254; n=253)
0
0%
0
0%
Low Phosphorus, Inorganic (n=254; n=251)
1
0.4%
2
0.8%
High Phosphorus, Inorganic (n=254; n=251)
3
1.2%
3
1.2%
Low Glucose, Serum (n=254; n=253)
22
8.6%
24
9.5%
High Glucose, Serum (n=254; n=253)
10
3.9%
13
5.1%
Low Protein, Total (n=254; n=253)
2
0.8%
0
0%
High Protein, Total (n=254; n=253)
0
0%
1
0.4%
Low Albumin (n=254; n=253)
2
0.8%
5
2%
High Protein, Urine (n=252; n=250)
6
2.3%
3
1.2%
High Glucose, Urine (n=252; n=250)
4
1.6%
6
2.4%
High Blood, Urine (n=252; n=250)
30
11.7%
22
8.7%
High Leukocyte Esterase (n=87; n=88)
13
5.1%
13
5.1%
High Red Blood Cells, Urine (n=92; n=103)
30
11.7%
25
9.9%
High White Blood Cells, Urine (n=94; n=105)
38
14.8%
42
16.6%
High Uric Acid (n=254; n=253)
1
0.4%
1
0.4%

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Abatacept Placebo
Arm/Group Description ABA 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered dose) intravenous (IV) infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Study drug administered on Days 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12. Placebo (Dextrose 5% Water for Injection U.S.P. [D5W] or Normal Saline [NS] IV infusions in combination with oral MTX titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week. Administered on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days thereafter up to Month 12.
All Cause Mortality
Abatacept Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Abatacept Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 20/256 (7.8%) 20/253 (7.9%)
Cardiac disorders
PERICARDIAL EFFUSION 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION 1/256 (0.4%) 1/253 (0.4%)
CARDIAC FAILURE CONGESTIVE 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
ABDOMINAL PAIN 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
INGUINAL HERNIA 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
General disorders
SUDDEN DEATH 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
MULTI-ORGAN FAILURE 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
INFUSION RELATED REACTION 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLECYSTITIS 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
ACUTE HEPATIC FAILURE 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
Immune system disorders
ANAPHYLACTIC REACTION 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA 1/256 (0.4%) 3/253 (1.2%)
CELLULITIS 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
GASTROENTERITIS 1/256 (0.4%) 1/253 (0.4%)
BREAST CELLULITIS 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTION 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
LUNG INFECTION PSEUDOMONAL 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FALL 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
TIBIA FRACTURE 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
SPINAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
Investigations
INTERNATIONAL NORMALISED RATIO INCREASED 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DEHYDRATION 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRITIS 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
OSTEOARTHRITIS 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS 1/256 (0.4%) 1/253 (0.4%)
SPINAL OSTEOARTHRITIS 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
LIPOMA 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
NEOPLASM SKIN 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
PANCREATIC CARCINOMA 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE INCREASED 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION 2/256 (0.8%) 0/253 (0%)
Renal and urinary disorders
URETHRAL STENOSIS 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
CERVICAL DYSPLASIA 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PLEURISY 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
PLEURAL EFFUSION 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
PULMONARY EMBOLISM 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
RESPIRATORY FAILURE 0/256 (0%) 1/253 (0.4%)
INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
CRYPTOGENIC ORGANISING PNEUMONIA 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
Vascular disorders
HYPOTENSION 1/256 (0.4%) 0/253 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Abatacept Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 150/256 (58.6%) 155/253 (61.3%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA 26/256 (10.2%) 41/253 (16.2%)
DIARRHOEA 17/256 (6.6%) 24/253 (9.5%)
DYSPEPSIA 11/256 (4.3%) 14/253 (5.5%)
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER 9/256 (3.5%) 15/253 (5.9%)
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA 19/256 (7.4%) 23/253 (9.1%)
BRONCHITIS 18/256 (7%) 12/253 (4.7%)
NASOPHARYNGITIS 21/256 (8.2%) 26/253 (10.3%)
URINARY TRACT INFECTION 17/256 (6.6%) 22/253 (8.7%)
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION 26/256 (10.2%) 26/253 (10.3%)
Investigations
ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 16/256 (6.3%) 13/253 (5.1%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN 13/256 (5.1%) 14/253 (5.5%)
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE 30/256 (11.7%) 23/253 (9.1%)
DIZZINESS 19/256 (7.4%) 13/253 (5.1%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH 21/256 (8.2%) 16/253 (6.3%)
Vascular disorders
HYPERTENSION 17/256 (6.6%) 14/253 (5.5%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Study Director
Organization Bristol-Myers Squibb
Phone
Email Clinical.Trials@bms.com
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00122382
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IM101-023
First Posted:
Jul 22, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Nov 16, 2010
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2010