A Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Tocilizumab Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate and/or Other Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Participants

Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01941940
Collaborator
(none)
227
49
1
34
4.6
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This open-label, single arm, Phase 3b study will evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab (RoActemra), administered as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate and/or other DMARDs, in participants with moderate to severe active RA.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
227 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A National, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Weekly Tocilizumab Subcutaneous, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate and/or Other DMARDs in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 5, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 9, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 5, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Tocilizumab

Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 milligrams (mg) will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants can continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it becomes commercially available in Italy.

Drug: Tocilizumab
Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg as SC injection will be administered once every week.
Other Names:
  • RoActemra
  • Drug: DMARDs
    Non-biologic DMARDs according to standard of care, at a stable dose that was initiated at least 4 weeks prior to baseline.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGDA) and physician global assessment of disease activity (PGDA) assessed on 0-10 centimeters (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS). Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score less than or equal to (</=) 2.8 indicates disease remission, greater than (>) 2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.

    2. Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 20 [Baseline, Week 20]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.

    3. Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 16 [Baseline, Week 16]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.

    4. Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 12 [Baseline, Week 12]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.

    5. Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 8 [Baseline, Week 8]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.

    6. Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 4 [Baseline, Week 4]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.

    7. Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 2 [Baseline, Week 2]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission According to CDAI up to Week 52 [Baseline up to Week 52 (Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 38, and 52)]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 during any two consecutive visits, not including the baseline visit indicates disease remission.

    2. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeters per hour (mm/hour) and PtGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. DAS28-ESR </=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28-ESR >3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-ESR </=3.2 indicates remission.

    3. Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      SDAI is a numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI </=3.3 indicates disease remission, >3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, >11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and >26 indicates high disease activity.

    4. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response [Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: greater than or equal to (>/=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints), and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP or ESR at each visit.

    5. Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1; non-responders: change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

    6. Change From Baseline in Total TJC at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      TJC was defined as the total number of painful joints based on 68-joint assessment (TJC-68) and 28-joint assessment (TJC-28).

    7. Change From Baseline in Total SJC at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      SJC was defined as the total number of swollen joints based on 66-joint assessment (SJC-66) and 28-joint assessment (SJC-28).

    8. Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: DAS28-ESR and CDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and CDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.

    9. Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: DAS28-ESR and SDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI is a numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and SDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.

    10. Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: CDAI and SDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between CDAI and SDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.

    11. Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (DAS28-ESR) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between DAS28-ESR and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.

    12. Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (DAS28-ESR) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.

    13. Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (CDAI) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between CDAI and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.

    14. Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (CDAI) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between CDAI and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.

    15. Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (SDAI) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between SDAI and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.

    16. Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (SDAI) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient [Weeks 2, 24, 52]

      The SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between SDAI and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.

    17. Percentage of DMARDs Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation Events by Reasons [Baseline up to Week 52]

      Percentage of DMARDs dose reduction and/or discontinuation (Red/Dis) events is reported by different reasons.

    18. Percentage of Non-DMARDs Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation Events by Reasons [Baseline up to Week 52]

      Percentage of Non-DMARDs dose reduction and/or discontinuation (Red/Dis) events is reported by different reasons.

    19. Change From Baseline in PtGDA VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      Participants answered the following question: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today." Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

    20. Change From Baseline in PGDA VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      The physician assessed participant's current disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = maximum disease activity.

    21. Participant Pain VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      Participants assessed their pain using a 0-100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.

    22. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

    23. Missed Working Days Assessed Using Short Form-Health and Labor Questionnaire (SF-HLQ) Score at Weeks 24 and 52 [Weeks 24 and 52]

      The SF-HLQ assessed productivity losses related to health problems in individuals with paid or unpaid work and consisted of three modules (absenteeism from paid work, production losses without absenteeism from paid work and hindrance in the performance of paid and unpaid work). Any missed working days or number of worked days with reduced efficiency during the last month were reported.

    24. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Total Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52]

      FACIT total score is sum of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) score and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F; additional concerns) score. FACT-G is a core questionnaire that evaluates quality of life (QoL) in cancer population. FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general health-related QoL: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being; each item ranges from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FACT-G score ranges between 0-108. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire that evaluates self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities. Each item ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The sum of all responses result in the FACIT total score with a total possible range of 0 (better score) to 160 (worse score). Negative change from baseline represents a better QoL.

    25. Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at Weeks 24 and 52 [Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52]

      PSQI is a questionnaire with 18 questions to assess sleep quality. The 18 questions are distributed to 7 elements (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction). A participant indicates how frequently each item was experienced on a scale from 0 to 3. The global score is the sum score of all 7 elements and ranges from 0-21 with higher values indicating worse sleep quality. A score of >/=5 indicates poor sleepers.

    26. Treatment Compliance, as Assessed Using Participant Diary Cards and Return Records [Weeks 24 and 52]

      Treatment Compliance was calculated as (total actual doses taken for the period) / (total planned or prescribed dose for the period) x 100.

    27. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest [Baseline up to 95 weeks]

      An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs are AEs occurring between the first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after the last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Following AEs were considered as AEs of special interest: anaphylactic reaction, hypersensitivity, stress cardiomyopathy, Gilbert's syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation, injection site erythema, injection site hypersensitivity, injection site irritation, injection site pruritus, arthritis bacterial, cellulitis, klebsiella infection, oral candidiasis, pneumonia, skin infection, vulvovaginal candidiasis, alanine aminotransferase increased, hepatic enzyme increased, brain neoplasm malignant, and urticaria.

    28. Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to Tocilizumab [Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at 8 weeks after last dose (up to Week 60), at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visits 1 (Week 64), 2 (Week 76), and 3 (Week 88)]

      Percentage of participants with positive results for ATA against tocilizumab at different time points is reported.

    29. Mean Tocilizumab Concentration [Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76)]

    30. Mean Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentration [Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76)]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Diagnosis of active RA according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria or EULAR/ACR (2010) criteria

    • Moderate to severe RA (CDAI at least [>/=] 10 and DAS28 >/=3.2) at screening

    • Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors-inadequate responder (TNF-IR), methotrexate-inadequate responder (MTX-IR), and/or DMARDs-inadequate responder (DMARDs-IR)

    • Oral corticosteroids (less than or equal to [</=] 10 mg per day prednisone or equivalent) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; up to the maximum recommended dose) are permitted if on a stable dose regimen for >/=4 weeks prior to baseline

    • Permitted non-biologic DMARDs are allowed if at a stable dose for >/=4 weeks prior to baseline

    • Receiving treatment on an outpatient basis, not including tocilizumab

    • Females of childbearing potential and males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use a reliable means of contraception for at least 3 months following the last dose of tocilizumab

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 12 months following baseline

    • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA; secondary Sjögren's syndrome with RA is permitted

    • Functional Class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in RA

    • Diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis or juvenile RA and/or RA before the age of 16

    • Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA

    • Exposure to tocilizumab (either intravenous [IV] or SC) at any time prior to baseline

    • Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer) of screening

    • Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies

    • Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline

    • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized, or murine monoclonal antibodies

    • Evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant cardiovascular, nervous system, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus), or gastrointestinal disease

    • Known active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, or other infections

    • Any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within 4 weeks of screening or oral antibiotics within 2 weeks of screening

    • Active tuberculosis (TB) requiring treatment within the previous 3 years

    • Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody

    • Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active)

    • Evidence of active malignant disease, malignancies diagnosed within the previous 10 years (except for basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri that has been excised and cured), or breast cancer diagnosed within the previous 20 years

    • Pregnant or breast feeding women

    • Neuropathies or other conditions that might interfere with pain evaluation

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Uni Degli Studi Di L Aquila; Cattedra Di Reumatologia - Dept. Di Medicina Interna E San Coppito Abruzzo Italy 67100
    2 P. O. Spirito Santo - Asl Pescara; U.O. Complessa Di Reumatologia Pescara Abruzzo Italy 65100
    3 Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi Melacrino Morelli; Unità Operativa di Reumatologia Reggio Calabria Calabria Italy 89133
    4 Az. Ospedaliera S. Giuseppe Moscati; Dip. Med. Gen. Struttura Semplice Reumatologia Avellino Campania Italy 83100
    5 Azienda Ospedaliera Rummo; Divisione Di Reumatologia Benevento Campania Italy 82100
    6 Azienda Ospedaliera A. Cardarelli; Medicina III - Divisione di Reumatologia Napoli Campania Italy 80131
    7 Policlinico Universitario-II Università di Napoli; Reumatologia Napoli Campania Italy 80131
    8 Osp Riuniti S.Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona; Rep. Medicina Interna Salerno Campania Italy 84131
    9 Irccs Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri-Istituto Scientifico Di Telese;U.O. Riabilitazione Reumatologica Telese Terme Campania Italy 82037
    10 A.O.U Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi di Bologna U.O di Medicina Interna Borghi - Pad.2 Bologna Emilia-Romagna Italy 40138
    11 A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Di Modena; Reumatologia Modena Emilia-Romagna Italy 41100
    12 Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova; Reumatologia Reggio Emilia Emilia-Romagna Italy 42100
    13 Policlinico Univ. Uni Degli Sudi Di Udine; Clinica Di Reumatologia Udine Friuli-Venezia Giulia Italy 33100
    14 Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico Di Trigoria; Medicina Clinica E Reumatologia Roma Lazio Italy 00128
    15 Policlinico Tor Vergata; Divisione Di Reumatologia Roma Lazio Italy 00133
    16 Ospedale S.Pietro Fatebenefratelli; Divisione di Reumatologia Roma Lazio Italy 00189
    17 Ospedale La Colletta; Reparto Di Reumatologia Arenzano Liguria Italy 16011
    18 Università Degli Studi Di Genova - Dimi; Reumatologia Genova Liguria Italy 16132
    19 Ospedale San Paolo; Divisione di Reumatologia Savona Liguria Italy 17100
    20 Asst Papa Giovanni XXIII; Dh Reumatologia Bergamo Lombardia Italy 24127
    21 Ospedale Civile "La Memoria" Di Gavardo;Immunoematologia Trasfusionale-Allergologia E Reumatologia Gavardo Lombardia Italy 25085
    22 Ospedale Di Magenta Fornaroli; U.O. Di Reumatologia Magenta Lombardia Italy 20013
    23 Asst Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumato-Logico Gaetano Pini/Cto; Divisione Di Reumatologia Milano Lombardia Italy 20122
    24 Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Unità Operativa Complessa di Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica Milano Lombardia Italy 20122
    25 ASST FATEBENEFRATELLI SACCO; Reumatologia (Sacco) Milano Lombardia Italy 20157
    26 Asst Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda; Reumatologia Milano Lombardia Italy 20162
    27 ASST DI MONZA; Reumatologia (Medicina I) Monza Lombardia Italy 20052
    28 Irccs Policlinico San Matteo; Reumatologia Adulti Pavia Lombardia Italy 27100
    29 ASST DI VIMERCATE; Medicina Generale Vimercate Lombardia Italy 20059
    30 Ospedale Regionale Torrette; SOD Clinica Medica del Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialisti Ancona Marche Italy 60020
    31 Ospedale Murri - Universita Politecnica Delle Marche; Clinica Reumatologica Ii Jesi Marche Italy 60035
    32 Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore Della Carita; Day Hospital Immunologia Novara Piemonte Italy 28100
    33 Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista; Reparto Reumatologia Torino Piemonte Italy 10126
    34 Ordine Mauriziano Ospedale Umberto I; Centro Di Reumatologia Torino Piemonte Italy 10128
    35 Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico; Servizio Reumatologia Bari Puglia Italy 70124
    36 ASL Lecce- Presidio Ospedaliero di Casarano-Servizio di Reumatologia ed Osteoporosi Casarano (LE) Puglia Italy 73042
    37 Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia; Dipartimento Medicina Interna Reumatologia Foggia Puglia Italy 71100
    38 Ospedali Riuniti Di Foggia; Struttura Di Reumatologia Foggia Puglia Italy 71100
    39 A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Monserrato Di Cagliari; Reumatologia I Cagliari Sardegna Italy 09042
    40 Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari; UOC Reumatologia Sassari Sardegna Italy 07100
    41 Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele Ii; U.O. Reumatologia Clinica Medica Condorelli Catania Sicilia Italy 95124
    42 Azienda Osped. Univ. Policlinico G. Martino; Centro Prevenzione E Cura Osteoporosi Messina Sicilia Italy 98100
    43 Arnas Ospedale Civico; Medicina Interna II Palermo Sicilia Italy 90127
    44 Ospedale Careggi Villa Monnatessa ; Sezione Di Reumatologia Firenze Toscana Italy 50139
    45 Az. Osp. Pisana Ospedale S. Chiara; U.O. Di Reumatologia Pisa Toscana Italy 56100
    46 Osp S. Maria Misericordia Dip. Medicina Clinica Sperimentale Cattedra Reumatologia Perugia Umbria Italy 06122
    47 Ospedale Regionale Umberto Parini; Reparto Endocrinologia e Diabetologia - Amb. Reumatologia Aosta Valle D'Aosta Italy 11100
    48 Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Borgo Trento; Dipartimento di Medicina Sezione di Reumatologia Verona Veneto Italy 37126
    49 Policlinico G.B. Rossi; Divisione Immunologia Clinica Sperimentale Medicina B Verona Veneto Italy 37134

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Hoffmann-La Roche

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Hoffmann-La Roche
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01941940
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ML28699
    • 2013-001569-17
    First Posted:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 11, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail Out of a total of 288 participants screened, 60 participants were excluded due to screening failure and 1 participant did not receive study treatment based on investigator's decision. Thus, total 227 participants were included in the study.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 milligrams (mg) was administered as subcutaneous (SC) injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 227
    COMPLETED 194
    NOT COMPLETED 33

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Overall Participants 227
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    54.7
    (12.12)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    197
    86.8%
    Male
    30
    13.2%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGDA) and physician global assessment of disease activity (PGDA) assessed on 0-10 centimeters (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS). Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score less than or equal to (</=) 2.8 indicates disease remission, greater than (>) 2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 183
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -21.6
    (13.25)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 20
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 20

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 185
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -21.3
    (12.87)
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 16
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 191
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -20.2
    (12.53)
    4. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 12
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 198
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -19.1
    (12.46)
    5. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 8
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 8

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 203
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -17.7
    (12.07)
    6. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 4
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 212
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -14.0
    (11.57)
    7. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 2
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 indicates low disease activity, >10 to 22 indicates moderate disease activity, and >22 indicates high disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 2

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 218
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -9.1
    (9.71)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission According to CDAI up to Week 52
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI score </=2.8 during any two consecutive visits, not including the baseline visit indicates disease remission.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 52 (Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 38, and 52)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 227
    Number [participants]
    10
    4.4%
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeters per hour (mm/hour) and PtGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. DAS28-ESR </=3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28-ESR >3.2 to 5.1 indicates moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-ESR </=3.2 indicates remission.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 216
    Baseline (n=216)
    5.81
    (1.080)
    Change at Week 2 (n=208)
    -1.5
    (1.04)
    Change at Week 24 (n=174)
    -3.2
    (1.47)
    Change at Week 52 (n=31)
    -3.6
    (1.18)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description SDAI is a numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI </=3.3 indicates disease remission, >3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, >11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and >26 indicates high disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 215
    Baseline (n=215)
    48.70
    (45.790)
    Change at Week 2 (n=203)
    -26.5
    (44.04)
    Change at Week 24 (n=176)
    -38.9
    (48.75)
    Change at Week 52 (n=29)
    -39.3
    (26.82)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response
    Description The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: greater than or equal to (>/=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints), and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP or ESR at each visit.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 222
    Week 2: ACR 20 (n=222)
    18.5
    8.1%
    Week 2: ACR 50 (n=222)
    6.3
    2.8%
    Week 2: ACR 70 (n=222)
    11.7
    5.2%
    Week 24: ACR 20 (n=192)
    8.3
    3.7%
    Week 24: ACR 50 (n=192)
    4.7
    2.1%
    Week 24: ACR 70 (n=192)
    65.6
    28.9%
    Week 52: ACR 20 (n=70)
    0.0
    0%
    Week 52: ACR 50 (n=70)
    0.0
    0%
    Week 52: ACR 70 (n=70)
    40.0
    17.6%
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28
    Description The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1; non-responders: change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 222
    Week 2: No Response (n=222)
    32.4
    14.3%
    Week 2: Moderate Response (n=222)
    50.5
    22.2%
    Week 2: Good Response (n=222)
    17.1
    7.5%
    Week 24: No Response (n=192)
    13.5
    5.9%
    Week 24: Moderate Response (n=192)
    25.0
    11%
    Week 24: Good Response (n=192)
    61.5
    27.1%
    Week 52: No Response (n=70)
    55.7
    24.5%
    Week 52: Moderate Response (n=70)
    8.6
    3.8%
    Week 52: Good Response (n=70)
    35.7
    15.7%
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Total TJC at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description TJC was defined as the total number of painful joints based on 68-joint assessment (TJC-68) and 28-joint assessment (TJC-28).
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 224
    TJC-68, Baseline (n=223)
    16.91
    (10.860)
    TJC-68, Change at Week 2 (n=218)
    -5.4
    (8.38)
    TJC-68, Change at Week 24 (n=188)
    -12.9
    (11.18)
    TJC-68, Change at Week 52 (n=69)
    -16.5
    (10.35)
    TJC-28, Baseline (n=224)
    11.32
    (6.241)
    TJC-28, Change at Week 2 (n=219)
    -3.7
    (5.40)
    TJC-28, Change at Week 24 (n=189)
    -8.6
    (6.62)
    TJC-28, Change at Week 52 (n=70)
    -11.0
    (6.14)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments TJC-68: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments TJC-68: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments TJC-68: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments TJC-28: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments TJC-28: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments TJC-28: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Total SJC at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description SJC was defined as the total number of swollen joints based on 66-joint assessment (SJC-66) and 28-joint assessment (SJC-28).
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 224
    SJC-66, Baseline (n=223)
    9.53
    (6.713)
    SJC-66, Change at Week 2 (n=218)
    -3.7
    (4.94)
    SJC-66, Change at Week 24 (n=188)
    -8.3
    (6.73)
    SJC-66, Change at Week 52 (n=69)
    -9.1
    (6.66)
    SJC-28, Baseline (n=224)
    7.90
    (5.203)
    SJC-28, Change at Week 2 (n=219)
    -2.9
    (3.91)
    SJC-28, Change at Week 24 (n=189)
    -6.7
    (5.17)
    SJC-28, Change at Week 52 (n=70)
    -7.6
    (4.63)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments SJC-66: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments SJC-66: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments SJC-66: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments SJC-28: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments SJC-28: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments SJC-28: Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: DAS28-ESR and CDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
    Description DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and CDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 213
    Week 2 (n=213)
    0.86514
    Week 24 (n=182)
    0.86944
    Week 52 (n=32)
    0.87301
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and CDAI at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and CDAI at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and CDAI at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: DAS28-ESR and SDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
    Description DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI is a numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and SDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 213
    Week 2 (n=213)
    0.88118
    Week 24 (n=182)
    0.87060
    Week 52 (n=31)
    0.81995
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and SDAI at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and SDAI at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and SDAI at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameters: CDAI and SDAI, Assessed Using Correlation Coefficient
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. Higher scores represent greater affectation due to disease activity. SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater affectation due to disease activity. Correlation coefficient for relationship between CDAI and SDAI at different time points is reported. Correlation coefficient value range= -1 to 1. Higher positive value indicates greater positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 213
    Week 2 (n=213)
    0.98602
    Week 24 (n=185)
    0.97515
    Week 52 (n=31)
    0.97389
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and SDAI at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and SDAI at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and SDAI at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (DAS28-ESR) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
    Description DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between DAS28-ESR and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 213
    Week 2: DAS28-ESR and ACR20 (n=213)
    -1.02676
    Week 2: DAS28-ESR and ACR50 (n=213)
    -1.31737
    Week 2: DAS28-ESR and ACR70 (n=213)
    -1.50400
    Week 24: DAS28-ESR and ACR20 (n=182)
    -1.71191
    Week 24: DAS28-ESR and ACR50 (n=182)
    -1.54281
    Week 24: DAS28-ESR and ACR70 (n=182)
    -1.43977
    Week 52: DAS28-ESR and ACR20 (n=32)
    -2.05036
    Week 52: DAS28-ESR and ACR50 (n=32)
    -2.05036
    Week 52: DAS28-ESR and ACR70 (n=32)
    -2.05036
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR20 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR50 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR70 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR20 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR50 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR70 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR20 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0004
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR50 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0004
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and ACR70 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0004
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    19. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (DAS28-ESR) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
    Description DAS28-ESR is calculated from the TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, the ESR in mm/hour and PtGDA. DAS28-ESR total score= 0-9.4. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between DAS28-ESR and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 213
    Week 2: DAS28-ESR and EULAR (n=213)
    -1.62883
    Week 24: DAS28-ESR and EULAR (n=182)
    -1.36226
    Week 52: DAS28-ESR and EULAR (n=32)
    -1.47781
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and EULAR at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and EULAR at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between DAS28-ESR and EULAR at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    20. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (CDAI) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between CDAI and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 220
    Week 2: CDAI and ACR20 (n=220)
    -9.65473
    Week 2: CDAI and ACR50 (n=220)
    -10.67389
    Week 2: CDAI and ACR70 (n=220)
    -13.38810
    Week 24: CDAI and ACR20 (n=186)
    -13.18433
    Week 24: CDAI and ACR50 (n=186)
    -11.95933
    Week 24: CDAI and ACR70 (n=186)
    -11.18299
    Week 52: CDAI and ACR20 (n=32)
    -18.94643
    Week 52: CDAI and ACR50 (n=32)
    -18.94643
    Week 52: CDAI and ACR70 (n=32)
    -18.94643
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR20 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR50 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR70 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR20 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR50 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR70 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR20 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR50 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and ACR70 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    21. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (CDAI) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
    Description The CDAI is a numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS. CDAI total score = 0-76. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between CDAI and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 220
    Week 2: CDAI and EULAR (n=220)
    -10.97686
    Week 24: CDAI and EULAR (n=186)
    -7.03184
    Week 52: CDAI and EULAR (n=32)
    -9.46563
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and EULAR at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and EULAR at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between CDAI and EULAR at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    22. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (SDAI) and Treatment Response Parameters (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
    Description SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. The ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses: >/=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in TJC and SJC, and 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria, respectively: 1) PGDA, 2) PtGDA, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. Regression coefficients for relationship between SDAI and ACR responses (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) at different time points are reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 213
    Week 2: SDAI and ACR20 (n=213)
    -9.44923
    Week 2: SDAI and ACR50 (n=213)
    -10.74230
    Week 2: SDAI and ACR70 (n=213)
    -13.31421
    Week 24: SDAI and ACR20 (n=185)
    -14.19790
    Week 24: SDAI and ACR50 (n=185)
    -12.65454
    Week 24: SDAI and ACR70 (n=185)
    -11.78067
    Week 52: SDAI and ACR20 (n=31)
    -22.83519
    Week 52: SDAI and ACR50 (n=31)
    -22.83519
    Week 52: SDAI and ACR70 (n=31)
    -22.83519
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR20 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR50 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR70 at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR20 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR50 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR70 at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR20 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR50 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and ACR70 at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    23. Secondary Outcome
    Title Association Between Disease Activity Parameter (SDAI) and Treatment Response Parameter (EULAR), Assessed Using Regression Coefficient
    Description The SDAI is a numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGDA and PGDA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS and CRP in mg/dL. SDAI total score= 0-86. EULAR response criteria (based on DAS28 score): Good responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 </=3.2); Moderate responders (change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to </=5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to </=1.2 with DAS28 </=5.1); Non-responders (change from baseline </=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and </=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1). Regression coefficient for relationship between SDAI and EULAR Good response at different time points is reported. Regression coefficient value range= not defined (any negative or positive value is possible). Higher positive value indicates greater extent of positive relationship and higher negative value indicates greater extent of negative relationship.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 213
    Week 2: SDAI and EULAR (n=213)
    -11.73463
    Week 24: SDAI and EULAR (n=185)
    -7.32435
    Week 52: SDAI and EULAR (n=31)
    -9.64146
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and EULAR at Week 2
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and EULAR at Week 24
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for association between SDAI and EULAR at Week 52
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0016
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    24. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of DMARDs Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation Events by Reasons
    Description Percentage of DMARDs dose reduction and/or discontinuation (Red/Dis) events is reported by different reasons.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants with DMARDs dose reductions and/or discontinuation.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 79
    Measure DMARDs Dose Red/Dis Events 148
    Safety
    27.7
    Discomfort
    9.5
    Lack of Efficacy
    29.7
    Other Than Above
    31.1
    Unknown
    2.0
    25. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Non-DMARDs Dose Reductions and/or Discontinuation Events by Reasons
    Description Percentage of Non-DMARDs dose reduction and/or discontinuation (Red/Dis) events is reported by different reasons.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants with non-DMARDs dose reductions and/or discontinuation.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 154
    Measure Non-DMARDs Dose Red/Dis Events 547
    Safety
    9.5
    Discomfort
    1.3
    Lack of Efficacy
    8.8
    Other Than Above
    73.7
    Unknown
    6.8
    26. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in PtGDA VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description Participants answered the following question: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today." Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 226
    Baseline (n=226)
    61.31
    (23.526)
    Change at Week 2 (n=220)
    -10.6
    (20.99)
    Change at Week 24 (n=186)
    -28.4
    (27.40)
    Change at Week 52 (n=32)
    -38.4
    (27.65)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    27. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in PGDA VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description The physician assessed participant's current disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = maximum disease activity.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 226
    Baseline (n=226)
    57.36
    (19.228)
    Change at Week 2 (n=220)
    -15.3
    (17.49)
    Change at Week 24 (n=186)
    -38.0
    (25.13)
    Change at Week 52 (n=32)
    -43.9
    (17.13)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    28. Secondary Outcome
    Title Participant Pain VAS Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description Participants assessed their pain using a 0-100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.
    Time Frame Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 226
    Baseline (n=226)
    58.21
    (23.622)
    Change at Week 2 (n=220)
    -11.4
    (22.38)
    Change at Week 24 (n=186)
    -26.5
    (27.31)
    Change at Week 52 (n=32)
    -36.0
    (26.82)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    29. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 223
    Baseline (n=223)
    1.04
    (0.687)
    Change at Week 2 (n=215)
    -0.2
    (0.44)
    Change at Week 24 (n=183)
    -0.4
    (0.63)
    Change at Week 52 (n=31)
    -0.5
    (0.69)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    30. Secondary Outcome
    Title Missed Working Days Assessed Using Short Form-Health and Labor Questionnaire (SF-HLQ) Score at Weeks 24 and 52
    Description The SF-HLQ assessed productivity losses related to health problems in individuals with paid or unpaid work and consisted of three modules (absenteeism from paid work, production losses without absenteeism from paid work and hindrance in the performance of paid and unpaid work). Any missed working days or number of worked days with reduced efficiency during the last month were reported.
    Time Frame Weeks 24 and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 69
    Week 24 (n=69)
    6.4
    (45.09)
    Week 52 (n=7)
    0.3
    (0.76)
    31. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Total Score at Weeks 2, 24, and 52
    Description FACIT total score is sum of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) score and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F; additional concerns) score. FACT-G is a core questionnaire that evaluates quality of life (QoL) in cancer population. FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general health-related QoL: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being; each item ranges from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FACT-G score ranges between 0-108. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire that evaluates self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities. Each item ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The sum of all responses result in the FACIT total score with a total possible range of 0 (better score) to 160 (worse score). Negative change from baseline represents a better QoL.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 24, and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 207
    Baseline (n=207)
    72.41
    (16.806)
    Change at Week 2 (n=196)
    -5.8
    (14.10)
    Change at Week 24 (n=165)
    -11.1
    (18.60)
    Change at Week 52 (n=60)
    -43.8
    (34.87)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 2 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    32. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at Weeks 24 and 52
    Description PSQI is a questionnaire with 18 questions to assess sleep quality. The 18 questions are distributed to 7 elements (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction). A participant indicates how frequently each item was experienced on a scale from 0 to 3. The global score is the sum score of all 7 elements and ranges from 0-21 with higher values indicating worse sleep quality. A score of >/=5 indicates poor sleepers.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per-protocol analysis set (PPAS) included all participants in FAS without any major protocol violation and who completed 24 weeks of treatment period. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed'=participants evaluable for this outcome; 'n'=participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 103
    Baseline (n=103)
    11.00
    (2.719)
    Change at Week 24 (n=73)
    -0.7
    (2.39)
    Change at Week 52 (n=16)
    -0.9
    (2.42)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 24 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0045
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tocilizumab
    Comments Analysis for change from baseline to Week 52 was performed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests for dependent sample.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1992
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests
    Comments
    33. Secondary Outcome
    Title Treatment Compliance, as Assessed Using Participant Diary Cards and Return Records
    Description Treatment Compliance was calculated as (total actual doses taken for the period) / (total planned or prescribed dose for the period) x 100.
    Time Frame Weeks 24 and 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 222
    Week 24 (n=221)
    94.9
    (10.20)
    Week 52 (n=222)
    94.7
    (10.12)
    34. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest
    Description An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs are AEs occurring between the first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after the last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Following AEs were considered as AEs of special interest: anaphylactic reaction, hypersensitivity, stress cardiomyopathy, Gilbert's syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation, injection site erythema, injection site hypersensitivity, injection site irritation, injection site pruritus, arthritis bacterial, cellulitis, klebsiella infection, oral candidiasis, pneumonia, skin infection, vulvovaginal candidiasis, alanine aminotransferase increased, hepatic enzyme increased, brain neoplasm malignant, and urticaria.
    Time Frame Baseline up to 95 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 227
    Number [percentage of participants]
    7.5
    3.3%
    35. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to Tocilizumab
    Description Percentage of participants with positive results for ATA against tocilizumab at different time points is reported.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at 8 weeks after last dose (up to Week 60), at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visits 1 (Week 64), 2 (Week 76), and 3 (Week 88)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 227
    Baseline (n=227)
    2.6
    1.1%
    Week 12 (n=6)
    100.0
    44.1%
    Week 24 (n=179)
    1.7
    0.7%
    Week 38 (n=6)
    33.3
    14.7%
    Week 52 (n=161)
    1.2
    0.5%
    8 Weeks After Last Dose (up to Week 60) (n=41)
    2.4
    1.1%
    Early Withdrawal (up to Week 52) (n=31)
    6.5
    2.9%
    Follow-up Visit 1 (Week 64) (n=16)
    100.0
    44.1%
    Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76) (n=11)
    100.0
    44.1%
    Follow-up Visit 3 (Week 88) (n=3)
    100.0
    44.1%
    36. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Tocilizumab Concentration
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 227
    Baseline (n=2)
    35.6
    (48.89)
    Week 12 (n=186)
    46.4
    (23.01)
    Week 24 (n=177)
    52.6
    (28.21)
    Week 38 (n=169)
    55.2
    (30.55)
    Week 52 (n=165)
    54.0
    (29.00)
    Early Withdrawal (up to Week 52) (n=19)
    24.8
    (22.90)
    Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76) (n=17)
    49.2
    (34.05)
    37. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentration
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 38, 52, at early withdrawal (up to Week 52), at Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS; Here 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    Measure Participants 227
    Baseline (n=213)
    43.6
    (49.30)
    Week 12 (n=189)
    543.9
    (144.34)
    Week 24 (n=181)
    536.3
    (144.32)
    Week 38 (n=171)
    557.8
    (144.23)
    Week 52 (n=168)
    539.4
    (147.04)
    Early Withdrawal (up to Week 52) (n=32)
    329.1
    (257.30)
    Follow-up Visit 2 (Week 76) (n=18)
    523.4
    (161.14)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Day 1 up to approximately 95 weeks
    Adverse Event Reporting Description FAS; TEAEs are adverse events occurring between the first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after the last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
    Arm/Group Title Tocilizumab
    Arm/Group Description Tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg was administered as SC injection alone or along with methotrexate and/or other non-biological DMARDs irrespective of body weight, once every week for a total of 52 weeks. After 52-weeks of treatment, at the discretion of the treating physician, participants could continue the study treatment with SC tocilizumab until it became commercially available in Italy (maximum up to 638 days).
    All Cause Mortality
    Tocilizumab
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Tocilizumab
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 17/227 (7.5%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Stress cardiomyopathy 1/227 (0.4%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastrointestinal perforation 1/227 (0.4%)
    Immune system disorders
    Anaphylactic reaction 1/227 (0.4%)
    Infections and infestations
    Pneumonia 1/227 (0.4%)
    Skin infection 1/227 (0.4%)
    Cellulitis 1/227 (0.4%)
    Diverticulitis 1/227 (0.4%)
    Klebsiella infection 1/227 (0.4%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Humerus fracture 1/227 (0.4%)
    Wrist fracture 1/227 (0.4%)
    Investigations
    Carcinoembryonic antigen increased 1/227 (0.4%)
    Hepatic enzyme increased 1/227 (0.4%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Intervertebral disc protrusion 1/227 (0.4%)
    Product Issues
    Device breakage 1/227 (0.4%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Ovarian cyst 1/227 (0.4%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Pleurisy 1/227 (0.4%)
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Bladder neoplasm surgery 1/227 (0.4%)
    Vascular disorders
    Aneurysm 1/227 (0.4%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Tocilizumab
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 36/227 (15.9%)
    Infections and infestations
    Influenza 23/227 (10.1%)
    Bronchitis 15/227 (6.6%)
    Urinary tract infection 12/227 (5.3%)
    Investigations
    Transaminases increased 15/227 (6.6%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 16/227 (7%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Medical Communications
    Organization Hoffmann-La Roche
    Phone 800-821-8590
    Email genentech@druginfo.com
    Responsible Party:
    Hoffmann-La Roche
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01941940
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ML28699
    • 2013-001569-17
    First Posted:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 11, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2017