Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression

Sponsor
Winthrop University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02654756
Collaborator
(none)
623
1
66
9.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

While there are proven therapies that slow CKD progression, these therapies can at times be harmful and costly. The ability to accurately predict the risk of CKD progression to ESRD would be extremely valuable. The short term versus lifetime risk of CKD progression should be taken into account when making risk based clinical decisions. In a representative CKD practice, the investigators compared the short term and lifetime risk assessment in our stage 3 CKD patients to determine whether decisions based on a short term risk assessment would underestimate the lifetime risk of CKD progression. The investigators also applied the short term risk assessment to our stage 4 CKD patients to determine the frequency with which ESRD risk may be overestimated in CKD stage 4.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    In the US, more than 20 million adults have Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and are therefore at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as compared to those without CKD. While there have been many substantiated therapies that slow the progression of CKD and improve overall outcomes, clinical decision making is difficult due to the variability of progression of CKD and increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. As these therapies can at times be harmful and costly, the ability to accurately predict the risk of CKD progression would be extremely valuable. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recently incorporated a risk scale that was a reflection of a composite of 5 CKD outcomes: all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, ESRD, acute kidney injury (AKI) and progression of CKD. It is in its infancy and guidelines reflecting this risk stratification have yet to be determined. Several risk prediction tools that have been validated in specific CKD populations but none have been widely accepted and implemented in the clinical setting. These tools incorporate multiple risk factors as compared to the KDIGO risk categories which uses eGFR and urine albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) to determine the risk of the above mention composite. The KDIGO scale does not take age into account and this may have a major effect on risk stratification. One risk assessment tool that does take the patients' age into account is the risk equation developed from the paper by Tangri N et al. (JAMA 2011;305(15):1553-1559). This equation uses age, sex, serum calcium levels, serum phosphate levels, serum albumin levels and serum bicarbonate levels in addition to GFR and UCR to calculate the risk of progression to ESRD requiring dialysis or transplantation. This risk calculator reflects short term risk as it supplies a 2yr and 5yr progression risk for CKD stage 3 and 4 patients. A Lifetime risk estimator (adjusted for competing risk of death) that uses age, sex and eGFR to define an age and sex specific 10, 20, 30, 40 and lifetime risk for CKD progression was provided by a study by Turin TC et al (J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;23(9):1569-1578). The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of using the 2yr, 5yr and lifetime risk assessment tools on a population of individuals with stage 3 and 4 CKD.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    623 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Retrospective
    Official Title:
    Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression
    Study Start Date :
    May 1, 2013
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Nov 1, 2018
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Nov 1, 2018

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage difference in risk levels when comparing short term risk and lifetime risk in patients with CKD stage 3. [2 to 5 years]

    2. Percentage of patients with CKD stage 4 in low, intermediate and high risk categories after assessing short term risk in patients with CKD stage 4. [2 to 5 years]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Assessment ESRD outcomes after risk stratification. [2 to 5 years]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Evaluation at least once by a nephrologist in the past year.

    • Subjects must have recent pertinent laboratory data within the last 2 years.

    • 2 documented creatinine values separated by at least 3 months

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Deceased patients

    • estimated GFR < 15ml/min

    • Patients with Acute Renal Failure (ARF)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Winthrop University Hospital Mineola New York United States 11501

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Winthrop University Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Shayan Shirazian, MD, Winthrop University Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Winthrop University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02654756
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 13311
    First Posted:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Keywords provided by Winthrop University Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 20, 2016