Root Coverage Comparing Suturing Techniques

Sponsor
University of Louisville (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01901822
Collaborator
(none)
16
1
2
10
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The hypothesis of this study is that coronally positioned tunnel with acellular dermal matrix using a continuous sling suture to secure both the graft and the flap will result in better percent root coverage compared to the continuous sling suturing technique to secure the graft and the flap separately.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Sutured together
  • Procedure: Sutured separately
N/A

Detailed Description

Thirty patients will be selected by meeting the following criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. At least one Miller Class I or II mucogingival defect ≥ 3 mm (Miller 1985). B. The mucogingival defect must be on a non-molar tooth. C. Patients must be between ≥ 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients with debilitating systemic or diseases that significantly affect the periodontium.

  2. Patients with a known allergy to any of the materials that will be used in the study, including systemic antibiotics (tetracycline and doxycycline).

  3. Patients requiring antibiotic prophylaxis. D. Root surface restorations at the site of recession. E. No detectable cemento-enamel junction. F. Patients who fail to maintain oral hygiene levels of at least 80% plaque free surfaces.

  4. Patients who are pregnant or lactating. H. Patients who use tobacco products (smoking or smokeless tobacco). I. Patients with alcohol abuse problems. J. Patients undergoing long-term steroid therapy. K. History of previous root coverage procedures, graft or guided tissue regeneration, on the test teeth.

  5. Patients who fail to complete the informed consent form.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
16 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Root Coverage With Acellular Dermal Matrix Using the Coronally Positioned Tunnel Technique Comparing Two Different Suturing Techniques.
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Sutured separately

The soft tissue and the allograft will each be sutured separately using a continuous sling suture.

Procedure: Sutured separately
The soft tissue and the allograft will be sutured separately using a continuous sling suture.

Experimental: Sutured together

The soft tissue and the allograft will be sutured together using a continuous sling suture.

Procedure: Sutured together
The soft tissue and the allograft will be sutured together using a continuous sling suture.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percent root coverage [6 months]

    The amount of root coverage will be measured and converted to a percent.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • At least one Miller Class I or II mucogingival defect ≥ 3 mm (Miller 1985).

  • The mucogingival defect must be on a non-molar tooth.

  • Patients must be between ≥ 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with a known allergy to any of the materials that will be used in the study, including systemic antibiotics (tetracycline and doxycycline).

  • Patients requiring antibiotic prophylaxis.

  • Root surface restorations at the site of recession.

  • No detectable cemento-enamel junction.

  • Patients who fail to maintain oral hygiene levels of at least 80% plaque free surfaces.

  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating.

  • Patients who use tobacco products (smoking or smokeless tobacco).

  • Patients with alcohol abuse problems.

  • Patients undergoing long-term steroid therapy.

  • History of previous root coverage procedures, graft or guided tissue regeneration, on the test teeth.

  • Patients who fail to complete the informed consent form.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Graduate Periodontics Clinic University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky United States 40202

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Louisville

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Henry Greenwell, DMD, University of Louisville

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Henry Greenwell, Professor, University of Louisville
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01901822
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 13.0332
First Posted:
Jul 17, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Dec 8, 2016
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2016
Keywords provided by Henry Greenwell, Professor, University of Louisville

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 8, 2016