Effects of Dextrose Prolotherapy in Rotator Cuff Disease

Sponsor
Istanbul University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04805242
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
7.9
7.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study is to determine the effects of dextrose prolotherapy on shoulder pain and functions in patients with chronic rotator cuff disease.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Dextrose Prolotherapy Injection
  • Other: Saline Injection
N/A

Detailed Description

Rotator cuff disease is a major cause of shoulder pain and disability. Non-surgical treatments to reduce pain and improve function have included therapeutic exercises, NSAIDs, subacromial corticosteroid injections. However, some patients are resistant to these conservative treatments. In recent years, prolotherapy has increased in popularity for the treatment of musculosketal conditions. Regenerative injection methods can be applied in resistant chronic rotator cuff disease. In this prospective, randomized controlled, single blind, interventional study, a total of 60 patients with shoulder pain due to rotator cuff disease who meet eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the study. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups using computer-generated random numbers. In the dextrose prolotherapy group, ultrasound-guided prolotherapy injections will be applied under aseptic conditions at 0, 3, and 6 weeks. In the salin injection group, salin injections will be applied under aseptic conditions at 0, 3, and 6 weeks. Home exercise program will be apply to both groups. Participants are going to evaluate before injection, and at the 1-month follow-up and 3-month follow-up using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain during activity, at rest, and at night, with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) change in pain and disability score, with The University of California and Los Angeles Rating Score (UCLA) change in pain and functional score and the change in the Ultrasound Shoulder Pathology Rating Scale (USPRS).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effects of Dextrose Prolotherapy in Rotator Cuff Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 18, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 12, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 12, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Dextrose prolotherapy groups

In the first group, dextrose prolotherapy injection will be applied.

Other: Dextrose Prolotherapy Injection
Subacromial injection: 5 cc solution (15% dextrose + saline + 1% lidocaine solution) will be injected into the subacromial bursa using a sterile 21 gauge injector. Extra-articular injection: Previously marked using a sterile 27 gauge injector (dental needle); A total of 10 cc solution (15% dextrose + saline + 1% lidocaine solution) will be injected into the infraspinatus, teres minor, supraspinatus insertion on the tuberculum majus, the subscapularis insertion on the tuberculum minus, the coracoid process and the long head of the biceps. As a home exercise program, shoulder range of motion and stretching, shoulder isometric and isotonic strengthening exercises will be given at least three days a week with 3 sets of 10 repetitions.

Sham Comparator: Saline groups

In the second group, physiological saline injection will be applied.

Other: Saline Injection
Subacromial injection: 5 cc solution (saline + 1% lidocaine solution) will be injected into the subacromial bursa using a sterile 21 gauge injector. Extra-articular injection: 5 cc solution (saline + 1% lidocaine solution) will be injected to the attachment areas of the previously marked tendons to the bone using a sterile 30 gauge injector. As a home exercise program, shoulder range of motion and stretching, shoulder isometric and isotonic strengthening exercises will be given at least three days a week with 3 sets of 10 repetitions.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change from baseline activity pain score at 1-months and 3-months [Baseline, 1-month, 3-month]

    Visual Analogue Scale-Activity pain (0-10 point). Higher scores mean a worse outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change from baseline rest pain score at 1-months and 3-months [Baseline, 1-month, 3-month]

    Visual Analogue Scale-Rest pain (0-10 point). Higher scores mean a worse outcome

  2. Change from baseline night pain score at 1-months and 3-months [Baseline, 1-month, 3-month]

    Visual Analogue Scale-Night pain (0-10 point). Higher scores mean a worse outcome

  3. Change from baseline pain, disability at 1-months and 3-months [Baseline, 1-month, 3-month]

    Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) measures shoulder pain and disability. It consists of 2 chapters and 13 subtitles in total. The total score range in the scale varies between 0-130. High scores are associated with more pain, and disability, while low scores indicate well-being.

  4. Change from baseline shoulder pain and function at 1-months and 3-months [Baseline, 1-month, 3-month]

    UCLA Shoulder Rating Score (The University of California and Los Angeles Rating Score); Over a total of 35 points, pain, function, patient satisfaction, flexion muscle strength, flexion angle are evaluated. Pain and function are evaluated on a scale of 1-10 points each, active flexion angle, flexion muscle strength, and patient satisfaction on a scale of 1-5 points each. In total, 34-35 points are considered excellent, 29-33 points good, and values below 29 points are considered poor. This outcome measure is a composite outcome measure consisting of multiple measures.

  5. Change from baseline rotator cuff structure at 1-months and 3-months [Baseline, 1-month, 3-month]

    USPRS (Ultrasound Shoulder Pathology Rating Scale); It is a scale that enables the evaluation of rotator cuff structures using ultrasound. It is evaluated over 20 points. High scores indicate increased pathology severity.

  6. Change from baseline shoulder flexion muscle strenght and flexion angle at 1-months and 3-months [Baseline, 1-month, 3-month]

    UCLA Shoulder Rating Score (The University of California and Los Angeles Rating Score); Over a total of 35 points, pain, function, patient satisfaction, flexion muscle strength, flexion angle are evaluated. Pain and function are evaluated on a scale of 1-10 points each, active flexion angle, flexion muscle strength, and patient satisfaction on a scale of 1-5 points each. In total, 34-35 points are considered excellent, 29-33 points good, and values below 29 points are considered poor.

  7. Change from baseline patient satisfaction at 1-months and 3-months [Baseline, 1-month, 3-month]

    UCLA Shoulder Rating Score (The University of California and Los Angeles Rating Score); Over a total of 35 points, pain, function, patient satisfaction, flexion muscle strength, flexion angle are evaluated. Pain and function are evaluated on a scale of 1-10 points each, active flexion angle, flexion muscle strength, and patient satisfaction on a scale of 1-5 points each. In total, 34-35 points are considered excellent, 29-33 points good, and values below 29 points are considered poor.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
30 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Shoulder pain for more than 3 months

  • Being resistant to conservative treatment for at least 3 months

  • Being in the age range of 30-65

  • Presence of rotator cuff disease detected in current magnetic resonance imaging and confirmed by clinical examination.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Presence of rheumatic disease or other systemic inflammatory diseases

  • Having a diagnosis of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus

  • Evidence of infection (systemically or locally on the shoulder)

  • The presence of a previous operation on the shoulder

  • Bleeding tendency (acquired or hereditary) [INR> 2 in the patient using coumadin]

  • Injected shoulder within the previous 8 weeks

  • The presence of local anesthesia and corn allergy

  • Passive shoulder abduction <100 ° or external rotation <25 °

  • Rotator cuff calcification diameter> 0.8cm in current direct graph or Usg

  • Presence of serious comorbidity

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Istanbul Fatih Turkey 34034

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Istanbul University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Selim Sezikli, MD, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Study Director: Demirhan Diracoglu, Prof., Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Selim Sezikli, MD, Principal Investigator, Istanbul University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04805242
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Shoulder Prolotherapy
First Posted:
Mar 18, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jun 9, 2021
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Selim Sezikli, MD, Principal Investigator, Istanbul University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 9, 2021