ROSI-EVA: ROTEM® Sigma Performance Evaluation - Method Comparison With Predicate Device and Reference Intervals

Sponsor
Tem Innovations GmbH (Industry)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02379104
Collaborator
(none)
240
5
14
48
3.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

ROTEM® sigma is a new thromboelastometric coagulation analysis system. The new system is fully automated allowing for a simple and safe operation compared to its predecessor model ROTEM® delta.

Method comparison of ROTEM® sigma with predecessor model ROTEM® delta) - confirmation of equality.

Confirmation of reference intervals of the ROTEM® systems.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: ROTEM sigma

Detailed Description

The main innovation of ROTEM® sigma is the development of a sample handler and a cartridge allowing for a of full automated test operation. As in ROTEM® delta four different tests can be run simultaneously on the four channels of the analyser.

Whereas the tests in ROTEM® delta are performed manually by pipetting a blood sample and liquid system reagents, in ROTEM® sigma the reagents are contained in freeze dried pellet form in a cartridge. Test operation is performed by inserting a cartridge and attaching a blood sample to the analyser.

The five available ROTEM® tests INTEM, EXTEM, FIBTEM, APTEM, and HEPTEM are contained in different combinations in two cartridge configurations:

  • Cartridge type 1 including INTEM, EXTEM, FIBTEM, APTEM

  • Cartridge type 2 including INTEM, EXTEM, FIBTEM, HEPTEM

Aim of the study is the performance evaluation of the new ROTEM® sigma coagulation analyzer in comparison to the current ROTEM® delta thromboelastometry system.

As a valid method comparison requires test results that cover the whole measurement range of the test system it is also necessary to include acute bleeding and emergency patients in the study. Only the inclusion of acute bleeding and emergency patients will produce strong pathologic test results allowing for a valid evaluation of the test system.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
240 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
ROTEM® Sigma Performance Evaluation - Method Comparison With Predicate Device and Reference Intervals
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2018
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Healthy Volunteers

Healthy volunteers fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria for reference interval sample group are tested with ROTEM sigma

Device: ROTEM sigma
Group Healthy Volunteers: a blood sample is tested with ROTEM sigma Group Patients with expected coagulopathy: a blood sample is tested with ROTEM sigma and ROTEM delta in parallel
Other Names:
  • ROTEM delta
  • Patients with expected coagulopathy

    Patients with expected bleeding and coagulation problems during elective surgery or at the ICU, or trauma patients are tested with ROTEM sigma and ROTEM delta comparatively

    Device: ROTEM sigma
    Group Healthy Volunteers: a blood sample is tested with ROTEM sigma Group Patients with expected coagulopathy: a blood sample is tested with ROTEM sigma and ROTEM delta in parallel
    Other Names:
  • ROTEM delta
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Method comparison: linear regression analysis and bias estimation at medical decision limits [Parameter differences assessed at time of blood sampling]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    Patients:
    • Age ≥ 18 years

    • Informed written consent

    • Patients with an acute bleeding during surgery

    • Or: trauma patients with acute bleeding

    • Or: hypercoagulable (above normal fibrinogen) patients at the ICU

    Healthy Volunteers:
    • Adult healthy individuals (≥ 18 years)

    • Written informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    Patients:

    • none

    Healthy Volunteers:
    • Any indications of alcohol or illegal drug abuse

    • Any chronic disease with possible effect on the coagulation (liver disease, coronary heart disease)

    • Any acute illness within the last 14 days

    • Any hemostasis associated disease (myocardial infarction, thrombosis , stroke etc.) within the last year

    • Intake of any coagulation affecting medication (aspirin, pain-killers, anti-rheumatic drugs, marcumar, platelet inhibitors) within the last 14 days

    • Females only: known pregnancy

    • Females only: breast feeding

    • Any indication for any hemostasis disorder as interrogated by a specific history of bleeding tendencies

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Florida Hospital Center for Thrombosis Research Orlando Florida United States 32789
    2 University of Maryland Medical Center Baltimore Maryland United States 21201
    3 Department of Anesthesiology Weill Cornell Medical College New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York New York United States 10065
    4 Medi. Medical University Innsbruck Department of General and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria 6020
    5 Institute of Anaesthesiology, Section Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and OR-Management University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland 8091

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Tem Innovations GmbH

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Volker Friemert, Dr., Tem Innovations GmbH

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Tem Innovations GmbH
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02379104
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RSE2015
    First Posted:
    Mar 4, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    May 11, 2017
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2017
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 11, 2017