Vascularized Versus Non-Vascularized Bone Grafts in Treating Proximal Pole Scaphoid Non Unions
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether treatment of scaphoid non-unions with a vascularized bone grafts improves patient reported pain and disability compared to treatment with a non-vascularized bone graft. Secondary objectives are to examine if there is any difference in the overall rate and time to union, range of motion, grip strength, or complication rates between the two groups.
In addition, this is the first prospective randomized study to directly compare the two techniques. This is also the first study to use standardized methods of assessing union (based on computerized tomography), standardized methods of collecting objective patient data, and utilizing validated patient questionnaires to assess pain and disability.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Vascularized Bone Graft Patients randomized to a vascularized bone graft will undergo a 1, 2-ICRSA vascularized bone graft based upon the 1,2 supra-retinacular vessels as described by Zaidemberg . (9. Zaidemberg C, Siebert JW, Angrigiani C. A new vascularized bone graft for scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg. 1991; 16A: 474-478.) |
Procedure: Vascularized Bone Graft
Vascularized bone graft in the treatment of Scaphoid Non-Union
|
Active Comparator: Non-Vascularized Bone Graft Patients randomized to the non-vascularized group will undergo trapezoidal bone grafting from the iliac crest as described by Fernandez . (10. Fernandez DL. A technique for anterior wedge-shaped grafts for scaphoid nonunions with carpal instability. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984 Sep;9(5):733-7.) |
Procedure: Non-Vascularized Bone Graft
Non-Vascularized Bone Graft in the treatment of Scaphoid Non-unions
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation [Change in PRWE score at time of Surgery (day 1) compared to two years post operation.]
Patients will fill out the patient rated wrist Evaluation Questionnaire
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Objective Measures [Change in strength, ROM, and Dexterity from time of surgery (day 1) compared to two years post operation.]
ROM Grip Strength Dexterity
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The primary inclusion criterion is any scaphoid waist or proximal pole non-union in a patient receiving a recommendation for operative treatment. Non-union is defined as <10% bony union across the fracture site on sagittal computerized tomography (CT) after at least 16 weeks of appropriate non-operative treatment or morphologic features on plain x-ray and CT (resorption and sclerosis at the fracture site, significant cyst formation) confirming non-union.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
radiologic evidence of significant scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist arthritis
-
fragmentation of the proximal pole
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph's Health Care | London | Ontario | Canada | N6A4L6 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, Canada
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ruby Grewal, MD, FRCSC, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- HULCscaphoid