Can we Forget? Directed Forgetting and Embodied Cognition in Schizophrenia
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Based on the theory of embodied cognition, which focuses on the influence of sensory and motor processes on cognition, researchers propose to study the influence of the action on memorization and inhibition in patients suffering from schizophrenia, using a directed forgetting paradigm. The directed forgetting paradigm is used, composed of two lists of action verbs. The instruction "to forget" is given at the end of learning the first list (To Be Forgotten (TBF)), following a simulation of a computer bug. Therefore a second list is presented to be learned and remembered (To Be Remembered (TBR)). A recognition task is performed at the end. The action verbs had to be encoded using four conditions: action performed, mimed, imagined action, action with a contextual word, reading the action verb only. 48 schizophrenic patients were included in this study. Patients were randomized to have 10 participants per condition. 48 controls matched by age, gender, laterality and education are also included and randomized in the same modality. This study aims to show that the encoding of sensory-motor components, more than providing a context could improve the inhibitory capacities but also memory in schizophrenia, and possibly be used in remediation cognitive.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Researchers used the directed forgetting paradigm composed of two lists of action verbs. The instruction "to forget" is given at the end of learning the first list (To Be Forgotten (TBF)), following a simulation of a computer bug. Therefore a second list is presented to be learned and remembered (To Be Remembered (TBR)). A recognition task is performed at the end. The action verbs had to be encoded using four conditions: action performed, mimed, imagined action, action with a contextual word, reading the action verb only. 48 schizophrenic patients were included in this study. Patients were randomized to have 10 participants per condition. 48 controls matched by age, gender, laterality and education are also included and randomized in the same modality. This study aims to show that the encoding of sensory-motor components, more than providing a context could improve the inhibitory capacities but also memory in schizophrenia, and possibly be used in remediation cognitive.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Patients group 1 Memorization of the verbs by miming the action |
Other: Memorization of the verbs by miming the action
The participant reads aloud the verbs that appear on the screen, by performing the corresponding action verb.
|
| Experimental: Patients group 2 Memorization of the verbs by imagining the action |
Other: Memorization of the verbs by imagining the action
The participant reads aloud the verbs that appear on the screen, by imagining the corresponding action verb.
|
| Experimental: Patients group 3 Memorization of the action verbs by means of another word |
Other: Memorization of the action verbs by means of another word
The participant reads aloud the verbs that appear on the screen. Then, he reads, without memorizing it, a word associated with the action verb to be learnt to favor the memorization of that one. The word is written near the action verb.
|
| Experimental: Patients group 4 Simple memorization of the verbs |
Other: Simple memorization of the verbs
The participant reads aloud the verbs that appear on the screen, without additional instructions (control condition).
|
| Active Comparator: Healthy volonteers group 1 Memorization of the verbs by miming the action |
Other: Memorization of the verbs by miming the action
The participant reads aloud the verbs that appear on the screen, by performing the corresponding action verb.
|
| Active Comparator: Healthy volonteers group 2 Memorization of the verbs by imagining the action |
Other: Memorization of the verbs by imagining the action
The participant reads aloud the verbs that appear on the screen, by imagining the corresponding action verb.
|
| Active Comparator: Healthy volonteers group 3 Memorization of the action verbs by means of another word |
Other: Memorization of the action verbs by means of another word
The participant reads aloud the verbs that appear on the screen. Then, he reads, without memorizing it, a word associated with the action verb to be learnt to favor the memorization of that one. The word is written near the action verb.
|
| Active Comparator: Healthy volonteers group 4 Simple memorization of the verbs |
Other: Simple memorization of the verbs
The participant reads aloud the verbs that appear on the screen, without additional instructions (control condition).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of items recalled TBR and TBF [Day 1]
It is asked to the participants to recall orally, only TBR verbs (task of reminder). The experimenter notes the given verbs.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of recognized items [Day 1]
Participants must recognize TBR verbs among several verbs (distractor or TBF verbs) on the screen.The experimenter notes the recognized verbs. The recognition of a verb in the TBF list or a distractor is considered like an error.
- Reaction time (ms) on the recognition of TBR and TBF [Day 1]
The response times of participants are recorded in ms.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for patients:
-
Schizophrenic patients as defined in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV)
-
Stabilized a therapeutic point of view for at least one month.
-
Consent form signed
-
Affiliated to a Security Health Program
Inclusion Criteria for volunteers:
-
Consent form signed
-
Affiliated to a Security Health Program
Exclusion Criteria for patients and volunteers :
-
Not having a history of head trauma, neurological disease or not stabilized serious somatic illness,
-
Not to use psychoactive substance, as defined by the DSM IV.
-
The Intelligence Quotient must not be less than 70 (Progressive Matrices Standard score (PM38), Raven Progressive Matrix).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHU de SAINT-ETIENNE | Saint Etienne | France | 42000 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anne GROSSELIN, MD, CHU de Saint-Etienne
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 1001156
- 2010-A01372-37