A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Basmisanil in Participants With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia (CIAS) Treated With Antipsychotics

Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02953639
Collaborator
(none)
214
37
3
36.4
5.8
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This multicenter study assessed the effects of 24 weeks of basmisanil treatment on cognition and functioning of stable schizophrenia participants treated with antipsychotics.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
214 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase IIb, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Basmisanil (RO5186582) as Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia Treated With Antipsychotics
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 30, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 12, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 12, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks.

Drug: Placebo
Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil, as per the dosing schedules described above.

Experimental: Basmisanil 80mg BID

Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.

Drug: Basmisanil
Participants received either 80 milligrams (mg) or 240 mg of Basmisanil, as per the dosing schedules described above.

Experimental: Basmisanil 240mg BID

Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.

Drug: Basmisanil
Participants received either 80 milligrams (mg) or 240 mg of Basmisanil, as per the dosing schedules described above.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite Score [Baseline up to Week 24]

    The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). The MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score is a standardized mean of the six domain scores (excluding social cognition). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher composite T-score represents lower impairment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain Scores [Baseline up to Week 24]

    The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher T-score represents lower impairment.

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) Score [Baseline up to Week 24]

    The Paired Associates Learning (PAL I and II) of the WMS-IV (Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth edition) is a test of verbal learning and memory that requires the participant to learn novel word pairs. The participant learns the word pairs across learning trials and is asked to recall them immediately (PAL I) or after a 30-minute delay (PAL II). Data is presented here for 3 Scores: VPA I total raw score, VPA II total raw score and VPA II Recognition total raw score. The total raw score ranges for these 3 Scores are 0 to 56, 0 to 14 and 0 to 40 respectively, with larger total raw scores indicating better performance.

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) Score [Baseline up to Week 24]

    Logical memory (LM) assesses narrative memory under free-recall conditions. Two short stories are presented orally. The examinee is asked to retell each story from memory immediately after hearing it (LM I). In the delayed condition (LM II), the examinee is asked to retell both stories from the immediate condition (delayed free recall). Data is presented here for 2 Scores: LM I total raw score and LM II total raw score. The total raw score range is from 0 to 50 with larger total raw scores indicating better performance.

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A Scores [Baseline up to Week 24]

    The TMT consists of two parts: Trail Making Part A, which is a part of the standard MCCB and Trail Making Part B additionally included in this study. Circles containing numbers (Part A) or both numbers and letters (Part B) must be sequentially connected. The difference (ratio) in performance between Part A and Part B reflects executive processes and will be used to assess executive functioning including cognitive set shifting abilities and data for this ratio is presented here. Smaller ratio values, hence decreases from baseline (TMT-B/TMT-A ratio values below 1) indicate higher executive functioning capabilities.

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score [Baseline up to Week 24]

    The PSP Total Score is an integer result in the range of 0 to 100. Larger values, hence increases from baseline in the PSP total score, indicate higher social and personal functioning.

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total Score [Baseline up to Week 24]

    The main parameter of interest for the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) is the SCoRS 'Total Score'. The total score range is from 0 to 80 with lower scores indicating better day-to-day functioning.

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Rating [Baseline up to Week 24]

    Values for the CGI-S Scale are encoded by the numerical values from 1 to 7 respectively. Higher numerical values represent greater impairment.

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Rating [Baseline up to Week 24]

    Values for the CGI-I Scale are encoded by the numerical values from 1 to 7 respectively. Higher numerical values represent greater impairment.

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS) [Baseline up to Week 24]

    The SQLS is a patient reported scale consisting of 33 items: 2 domain scores (Cognition & Vitality Score [SQLS-CV] and Psycho-social Score [SQLS-P]) as well as a Total score (SQLS-T) are derived. The overall score range is from 0 to 100. On all scales, higher scores represent a lower quality of life.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) [Baseline up to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 28 weeks)]

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An Adverse Event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as Adverse Events.

  11. Apparent Clearance of Basmisanil at Steady State (CL/F,ss) [Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168]

    Population PK model estimated apparent oral clearance of Basmisanil at steady-state.

  12. Apparent Volume of Distribution of Basmisanil at Steady State (Vz/F,ss) [Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168]

    Population PK model estimated apparent volume of distribution of Basmisanil at steady-state.

  13. Area Under the Curve of Basmisanil at Steady State (AUC,ss) [Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168]

    Population PK model estimated AUC of Basmisanil at steady-state.

  14. Maximum Plasma Concentration of Basmisanil at Steady State (Cmax,ss) [Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168]

    Population PK model estimated maximum plasma concentration of Basmisanil at steady-state (ss).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia of any type utilizing the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) direct clinical assessments, family informants and past medical records

  • Evidence of stability of symptoms for 3 months at screening, that is, without hospitalizations for schizophrenia or increase in level of psychiatric care due to worsening of symptoms of schizophrenia

  • Participants with schizophrenia clinical symptom severity defined by the following: hallucinatory behavior item score less than or equal to (</=) 5 and a delusion item score </= 5 of the PANSS

  • Participants on a stable regimen of antipsychotic therapy for at least 3 months at screening and receiving no more than two antipsychotics

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Participants with current DSM-5 diagnosis other than schizophrenia including bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder

  • Clinically significant neurological illness or significant head trauma that affects cognitive function, in the judgment of the principal investigator

  • Full scale intelligence quotient </=65 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence at screening

  • Positive result at screening for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus-1 and 2

  • Moderate to severe substance use disorder (other than nicotine or caffeine), as defined by the DSM-5, within the last 12 months

  • Suicide attempt within 1 year or currently at risk of suicide in the opinion of the Investigator

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Woodland International Research Group Inc. Little Rock Arkansas United States 72211
2 Woodland Research Northwest, LLC Rogers Arkansas United States 72758
3 ProScience Research Group Culver City California United States 90230
4 Collaborative Neuroscience Network, Inc. Garden Grove California United States 92845
5 California Clinical Trials Glendale California United States 91206
6 Alliance for Wellness, dba Alliance for Research Long Beach California United States 90807
7 Synergy Clinical Research National City California United States 91950
8 Pacific Research Partners, LLC Oakland California United States 94607
9 NRC Research Institute Orange California United States 92868
10 CNRI - Los Angeles, LLC Pico Rivera California United States 90660
11 Artemis Institute for Clinical Research, LLC San Diego California United States 92103
12 Collaborative Neuroscience Network Inc. Torrance California United States 90502
13 Yale School of Medicine - CT Mental Health Center (CMHC) - Schizophrenia Research Clinic New Haven Connecticut United States 06519
14 Vantage Clinical Trials Largo Florida United States 33770
15 Innovative Clinical Research, Inc. Lauderhill Florida United States 33319
16 Meridien Research Maitland Florida United States 32751
17 University of Miami Dept of Psychiatry Miami Florida United States 33136
18 Behavioral Clinical Research, Inc. North Miami Florida United States 33161
19 iResearch Atlanta Decatur Georgia United States 30030
20 Alexian Brothers Center for Psychiatric Research Hoffman Estates Illinois United States 60169
21 Community Clinical Research Center Anderson Indiana United States 46060
22 Booker, J. Gary, MD, APMC Shreveport Louisiana United States 71104-2136
23 Louisiana Clinical Research, LLC Shreveport Louisiana United States 71115
24 CBH Health Gaithersburg Maryland United States 20877
25 Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts United States 02114
26 Arch Clinical Trials, LLC Saint Louis Missouri United States 63118
27 St Louis Clinical Trials Saint Louis Missouri United States 63141
28 Hassman Research Institute Berlin New Jersey United States 08009
29 Neurobehavioral Research, Inc. Cedarhurst New York United States 11516
30 Manhattan Psychiatric Center; Psychopharmacology Research Unit New York New York United States 10035
31 Finger Lakes Clinical Research Rochester New York United States 14618
32 Neuro-Behavioral Clinical Research, Inc. Canton Ohio United States 44718
33 University Hospitals Cleveland Ohio United States 44106
34 Midwest Clinical Research Center Dayton Ohio United States 45417
35 Pillar Clinical Research LLC Garland Texas United States 75042
36 University Hills Clinical Research - Irving;Office of Dr. Knesevich Irving Texas United States 75062
37 Northwest Clinical Research Center Bellevue Washington United States 98007

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hoffmann-La Roche

Investigators

  • Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hoffmann-La Roche
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02953639
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BP39207
First Posted:
Nov 3, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Feb 9, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details The study was conducted at 37 centers in 1 country.
Pre-assignment Detail Overall, 214 participants were enrolled into the study across 37 sites in the US. Of these, 213 participants received study treatment and were included in the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) and Safety populations. One participant randomized to the placebo arm withdrew prior to the first study treatment administration.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 81 54 78
COMPLETED 61 40 62
NOT COMPLETED 20 14 16

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID Total
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 81 54 78 213
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
36.4
(8.2)
36.8
(8.6)
37.4
(8.4)
36.9
(8.4)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
20
24.7%
12
22.2%
18
23.1%
50
23.5%
Male
61
75.3%
42
77.8%
60
76.9%
163
76.5%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number]
Hispanic or Latino
13
16%
7
13%
12
15.4%
32
15%
Not Hispanic or Latino
68
84%
47
87%
66
84.6%
181
85%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number]
Asian
3
3.7%
0
0%
2
2.6%
5
2.3%
Black or African American
51
63%
30
55.6%
51
65.4%
132
62%
MULTIPLE
1
1.2%
0
0%
0
0%
1
0.5%
UNKNOWN
1
1.2%
1
1.9%
2
2.6%
4
1.9%
White
25
30.9%
23
42.6%
23
29.5%
71
33.3%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite Score
Description The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). The MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score is a standardized mean of the six domain scores (excluding social cognition). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher composite T-score represents lower impairment.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 76 77
Baseline
32.50
(14.47)
32.36
(11.44)
Week 12 Day 84
-0.17
(5.07)
-0.28
(6.08)
Week 24 Day 168
1.08
(5.78)
1.36
(4.80)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.730
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.36
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-2.11 to 1.38
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.793
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.47 to 2.02
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain Scores
Description The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher T-score represents lower impairment.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 76 77
Baseline (Attention/Vigilance)
40.75
(12.31)
39.66
(12.08)
Week 12 Day 84 (Attention/Vigilance)
-0.16
(8.00)
-0.14
(8.80)
Week 24 Day 168 (Attention/Vigilance)
0.63
(6.89)
0.51
(8.49)
Baseline (Reasoning and Problem Solving)
42.75
(12.61)
43.71
(10.12)
Week 12 Day 84 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)
0.05
(8.94)
0.05
(6.07)
Week 24 Day 168 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)
1.69
(7.23)
2.18
(6.13)
Baseline (Social Cognition)
37.79
(13.30)
38.38
(13.09)
Week 12 Day 84 (Social Cognition)
0.62
(7.74)
-0.62
(8.55)
Week 24 Day 168 (Social Cognition)
-1.71
(7.24)
0.96
(7.10)
Baseline (Speed of Processing)
37.08
(13.10)
37.81
(12.70)
Week 12 Day 84 (Speed of Processing)
-1.48
(7.41)
-1.66
(6.07)
Week 24 Day 168 (Speed of Processing)
0.37
(6.85)
0.13
(4.88)
Baseline (Verbal Learning)
37.34
(9.20)
36.53
(7.41)
Week 12 Day 84 (Verbal Learning)
0.26
(7.99)
0.45
(7.01)
Week 24 Day 168 (Verbal Learning)
0.46
(8.33)
0.36
(6.53)
Baseline (Visual Learning)
35.96
(12.18)
35.38
(11.98)
Week 12 Day 84 (Visual Learning)
-0.91
(8.14)
-0.48
(9.35)
Week 24 Day 168 (Visual Learning)
-0.98
(8.56)
0.53
(9.33)
Baseline (Working Memory)
35.99
(12.56)
36.23
(10.09)
Week 12 Day 84 (Working Memory)
1.62
(6.99)
0.76
(6.41)
Week 24 Day 168 (Working Memory)
2.37
(6.34)
1.76
(6.68)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (Attention/Vigilance)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.556
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.91
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.46 to 1.64
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (Attention/Vigilance)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.848
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-2.59 to 2.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.973
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-2.08 to 2.16
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.651
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.57
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.53 to 2.67
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (Social Cognition)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.350
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -1.44
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.89 to 1.08
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (Social Cognition)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.121
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 2.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.14 to 4.50
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (Speed of Processing)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.911
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-2.10 to 1.83
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (Speed of Processing)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.987
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.99 to 2.03
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (Verbal Learning)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.803
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-2.62 to 1.93
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (Verbal Learning)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.502
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.94
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.26 to 1.38
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (Visual Learning)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.945
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-2.74 to 2.52
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (Visual Learning)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.488
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 1.11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.54 to 3.76
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (Working Memory)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.262
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -1.37
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.38 to 0.64
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (Working Memory)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.489
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.89
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.01 to 1.23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) Score
Description The Paired Associates Learning (PAL I and II) of the WMS-IV (Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth edition) is a test of verbal learning and memory that requires the participant to learn novel word pairs. The participant learns the word pairs across learning trials and is asked to recall them immediately (PAL I) or after a 30-minute delay (PAL II). Data is presented here for 3 Scores: VPA I total raw score, VPA II total raw score and VPA II Recognition total raw score. The total raw score ranges for these 3 Scores are 0 to 56, 0 to 14 and 0 to 40 respectively, with larger total raw scores indicating better performance.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 76 77
Baseline (VPA I total raw score)
31.14
(12.53)
32.30
(11.75)
Week 12 Day 84 (VPA I total raw score)
2.14
(6.55)
0.36
(7.33)
Week 24 Day 168 (VPA I total raw score)
4.42
(6.58)
5.09
(6.40)
Baseline (VPA II total raw score)
9.25
(3.76)
9.77
(3.54)
Week 12 Day 84 (VPA II total raw score)
0.12
(2.29)
0.26
(2.15)
Week 24 Day 168 (VPA II total raw score)
0.69
(2.16)
1.60
(2.33)
Baseline (VPA II recognition total raw score)
36.24
(5.37)
37.36
(5.12)
Week 12 Day 84 (VPA II recognition total raw score)
0.48
(5.43)
-0.55
(2.92)
Week 24 Day 168 (VPA II recognition total raw score)
1.12
(5.60)
0.36
(2.80)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (VPA I total raw score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.211
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -1.63
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.78 to 0.52
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (VPA I total raw score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.787
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.35
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.81 to 2.52
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (VPA II total raw score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.477
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.37 to 0.94
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (VPA II total raw score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.028
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.91
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
0.23 to 1.58
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (VPA II recognition total raw score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.683
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.30
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.51 to 0.91
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (VPA II recognition total raw score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.954
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.13 to 1.22
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) Score
Description Logical memory (LM) assesses narrative memory under free-recall conditions. Two short stories are presented orally. The examinee is asked to retell each story from memory immediately after hearing it (LM I). In the delayed condition (LM II), the examinee is asked to retell both stories from the immediate condition (delayed free recall). Data is presented here for 2 Scores: LM I total raw score and LM II total raw score. The total raw score range is from 0 to 50 with larger total raw scores indicating better performance.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 76 77
Baseline (LM I)
16.55
(5.80)
16.22
(8.13)
Week 12 Day 84 (LM I)
-2.60
(5.33)
-0.83
(5.66)
Week 24 Day 168 (LM I)
-3.02
(4.96)
-2.29
(5.29)
Baseline (LM II)
13.72
(6.57)
14.29
(8.22)
Week 12 Day 84 (LM II)
-2.91
(6.04)
-2.63
(6.08)
Week 24 Day 168 (LM II)
-2.73
(4.94)
-3.22
(5.15)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (LM I)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.164
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 1.45
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.27 to 3.17
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (LM I)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.559
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.56
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.02 to 2.14
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (LM II)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.912
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.70 to 1.94
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (LM II)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.706
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.36
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.93 to 1.22
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A Scores
Description The TMT consists of two parts: Trail Making Part A, which is a part of the standard MCCB and Trail Making Part B additionally included in this study. Circles containing numbers (Part A) or both numbers and letters (Part B) must be sequentially connected. The difference (ratio) in performance between Part A and Part B reflects executive processes and will be used to assess executive functioning including cognitive set shifting abilities and data for this ratio is presented here. Smaller ratio values, hence decreases from baseline (TMT-B/TMT-A ratio values below 1) indicate higher executive functioning capabilities.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 76 77
Baseline
3.27
(1.65)
3.12
(1.58)
Week 12 Day 84
-0.37
(1.19)
-0.12
(1.34)
Week 24 Day 168
-0.23
(2.00)
-0.06
(1.22)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.527
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 1.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
0.94 to 1.15
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.636
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 1.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
0.92 to 1.17
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score
Description The PSP Total Score is an integer result in the range of 0 to 100. Larger values, hence increases from baseline in the PSP total score, indicate higher social and personal functioning.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 74 76
Baseline
59.82
(11.88)
60.88
(10.87)
Week 12 Day 84
3.13
(8.30)
2.26
(8.68)
Week 24 Day 168
3.75
(9.66)
4.14
(10.05)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.323
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -1.36
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.63 to 0.91
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.579
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.95
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.77 to 1.88
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total Score
Description The main parameter of interest for the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) is the SCoRS 'Total Score'. The total score range is from 0 to 80 with lower scores indicating better day-to-day functioning.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 76 77
Baseline
37.07
(8.52)
36.53
(9.84)
Week 12 Day 84
-2.91
(6.06)
-3.66
(5.78)
Week 24 Day 168
-3.71
(7.19)
-4.02
(7.79)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.493
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.67
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-2.27 to 0.94
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.926
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-2.32 to 2.07
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Rating
Description Values for the CGI-S Scale are encoded by the numerical values from 1 to 7 respectively. Higher numerical values represent greater impairment.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 75 77
Baseline
2.45
(0.62)
2.39
(0.75)
Week 12 Day 84
-0.21
(0.67)
-0.24
(0.60)
Week 24 Day 168
-0.19
(0.56)
-0.29
(0.76)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.839
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.22 to 0.17
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.625
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.27 to 0.15
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Rating
Description Values for the CGI-I Scale are encoded by the numerical values from 1 to 7 respectively. Higher numerical values represent greater impairment.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 58 58
Week 12 Day 84
-0.45
(0.86)
-0.45
(0.86)
Week 24 Day 168
-0.62
(1.01)
-0.64
(0.91)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.865
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.28 to 0.23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.964
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.31 to 0.29
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)
Description The SQLS is a patient reported scale consisting of 33 items: 2 domain scores (Cognition & Vitality Score [SQLS-CV] and Psycho-social Score [SQLS-P]) as well as a Total score (SQLS-T) are derived. The overall score range is from 0 to 100. On all scales, higher scores represent a lower quality of life.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 76 77
Baseline (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)
33.81
(17.41)
34.21
(18.59)
Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)
-2.26
(12.66)
0.21
(14.00)
Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)
-0.78
(15.71)
-4.32
(13.59)
Baseline (SQLS Psychosocial Score)
31.48
(20.26)
30.84
(20.88)
Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)
-0.88
(12.42)
0.80
(14.49)
Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)
-1.78
(12.87)
-1.58
(13.27)
Baseline (SQLS Total Score)
32.40
(18.51)
32.14
(19.19)
Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Total Score)
-1.42
(11.80)
0.57
(12.98)
Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Total Score)
-1.38
(12.89)
-2.66
(12.31)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.142
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 3.27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.40 to 6.95
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.416
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -2.32
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-7.04 to 2.40
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.394
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 1.98
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.86 to 5.83
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.776
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 0.71
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-3.44 to 4.87
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Total Score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.254
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value 2.43
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-1.09 to 5.94
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Basmisanil 240mg BID
Comments Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Total Score)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.816
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Treatment Difference
Estimated Value -0.57
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-4.64 to 3.50
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Description An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An Adverse Event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as Adverse Events.
Time Frame Baseline up to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 28 weeks)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The Safety-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not. Data are summarized according to actual treatment arm participants were randomized to.
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 81 54 78
Number [Percentage of Participants]
39.5
48.8%
46.3
85.7%
48.7
62.4%
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Apparent Clearance of Basmisanil at Steady State (CL/F,ss)
Description Population PK model estimated apparent oral clearance of Basmisanil at steady-state.
Time Frame Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Please note that for this Outcome Measure, incomplete PK data was collected as a result of early termination of the study which meant that data for the (CL/F,ss) parameter could not be generated via the Population PK model.
Arm/Group Title Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 0 0
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Apparent Volume of Distribution of Basmisanil at Steady State (Vz/F,ss)
Description Population PK model estimated apparent volume of distribution of Basmisanil at steady-state.
Time Frame Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Please note that for this Outcome Measure, incomplete PK data was collected as a result of early termination of the study which meant that data for the (Vz/F,ss) parameter could not be generated via the Population PK model.
Arm/Group Title Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 0 0
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Area Under the Curve of Basmisanil at Steady State (AUC,ss)
Description Population PK model estimated AUC of Basmisanil at steady-state.
Time Frame Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The Safety-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not. Data are summarized according to actual treatment arm participants were randomized to. Data presented below is only for participants included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 54 78
Median (Full Range) [ng*mL/hr]
41640
87624
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Maximum Plasma Concentration of Basmisanil at Steady State (Cmax,ss)
Description Population PK model estimated maximum plasma concentration of Basmisanil at steady-state (ss).
Time Frame Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The Safety-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not. Data are summarized according to actual treatment arm participants were randomized to. Data presented below is only for participants included in the actual analysis.
Arm/Group Title Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
Measure Participants 54 78
Median (Full Range) [ng/mL]
2079
4374

Adverse Events

Time Frame Baseline up to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 28 weeks)
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Placebo Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Arm/Group Description Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
All Cause Mortality
Placebo Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/81 (0%) 0/54 (0%) 0/78 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Placebo Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 5/81 (6.2%) 0/54 (0%) 4/78 (5.1%)
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular extrasystoles 1/81 (1.2%) 1 0/54 (0%) 0 0/78 (0%) 0
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis 1/81 (1.2%) 1 0/54 (0%) 0 0/78 (0%) 0
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute 0/81 (0%) 0 0/54 (0%) 0 1/78 (1.3%) 1
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic complication 0/81 (0%) 0 0/54 (0%) 0 1/78 (1.3%) 1
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder 1/81 (1.2%) 2 0/54 (0%) 0 2/78 (2.6%) 2
Schizophrenia 1/81 (1.2%) 1 0/54 (0%) 0 0/78 (0%) 0
Suicide attempt 1/81 (1.2%) 1 0/54 (0%) 0 0/78 (0%) 0
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Placebo Basmisanil 80mg BID Basmisanil 240mg BID
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 10/81 (12.3%) 10/54 (18.5%) 12/78 (15.4%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea 4/81 (4.9%) 4 3/54 (5.6%) 4 2/78 (2.6%) 2
General disorders
Fatigue 6/81 (7.4%) 7 1/54 (1.9%) 1 1/78 (1.3%) 1
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia 0/81 (0%) 0 3/54 (5.6%) 3 0/78 (0%) 0
Nervous system disorders
Headache 1/81 (1.2%) 1 3/54 (5.6%) 3 7/78 (9%) 9
Somnolence 0/81 (0%) 0 0/54 (0%) 0 4/78 (5.1%) 4

Limitations/Caveats

Following a planned futility analysis, enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued as of 8th November 2018. Results from the 80mg Basmisanil arm are thus not presented.

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Medical Communications
Organization Hoffmann-La Roche
Phone 800 821-8590
Email genentech@druginfo.com
Responsible Party:
Hoffmann-La Roche
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02953639
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BP39207
First Posted:
Nov 3, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Feb 9, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021