Complex Spine Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04538092
Collaborator
North Carolina Spine Society (Other)
50
1
2
23.6
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In the field of Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD), there are currently no standardized protocols for preoperative, intraoperative or post-operative care. New standards are being created for minimally invasive spine surgery within orthopedics and some neurosurgical centers. This study will evaluate the efficacy of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for complex spine surgery performed for the treatment of ASD.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol
N/A

Detailed Description

Purpose : In the field of Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD), there are currently no standardized protocols for preoperative, intraoperative or post-operative care. New standards are being created for minimally invasive spine surgery within orthopedics and some neurosurgical centers. This study will evaluate the efficacy of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for complex spine surgery performed for the treatment of ASD.

Participants : Patients undergoing surgery aimed at treating adult spinal deformity are the subject of this research. This population was chosen as these procedures are often associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS), high post-operative narcotic use, and often require complex post-operative discharge planning.

Procedures : Patients undergoing surgery to address the complications of ASD present a unique challenge in that this patient population is diverse, and there are multiple operative procedures available to treat the same condition. Given that there are currently no accepted or recommended Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for complex spine procedures, the investigators have developed an ERAS protocol at the University of North Carolina (UNC) in collaboration with the anesthesia department for the support of complex surgical patients.

Hypothesis: Implementing a multi-modal enhanced recovery after complex spine surgery protocol will improve patient measured outcomes and patient functional outcomes leading to a statistically significant reduction in LOS, post-operative pain, complication rate, cost.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Single Institution Prospective Analysis of an Enhanced Recovery After Complex Spine Surgery Protocol
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 14, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Control

Standard post op complex spine orders placed for patients undergoing deformity correction

Experimental: ERAS

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is applied to the patients undergoing deformity correction

Other: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol
The investigators have developed an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for complex spine surgery at UNC. This study will help elucidate the effects of multiple interventions tailored to help patients recover from complex surgery.
Other Names:
  • Preoperative education
  • Preoperative nutrition
  • Intraoperative analgesia
  • Intraoperative fluid resuscitation
  • Postoperative analgesic
  • Postoperative mobilization
  • Postoperative nutrition
  • Preoperative screening
  • Postoperative antibiotics
  • Preoperative analgesia
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Length of Stay [From conclusion of surgery to hospital discharge, an expected average of 10 days]

      Number of nights spent in the hospital following surgery

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Narcotic usage [From conclusion of surgery to 12 months]

      Total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) utilized while inpatient and after discharge

    2. 30 Day Readmission [From day of hospital discharge to 30 days]

      Did the patient require a repeat hospitalization within 30 days after the initial surgery?

    3. 90 Day Readmissions [From day of hospital discharge to 90 days]

      Did the patient require a repeat hospitalization within 90 days after the initial surgery

    4. 30 Day Reoperations [From day of hospital discharge to 30 days]

      Did the patient require a repeat reoperation within 30 days after the initial surgery

    5. Change in Oswestry Disability Index Score from Pre-op baseline. [Preop to post op comparison of ODI at 4 days, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months.]

      The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional impairment is used to quantify disability related to lower back pain. The final score/index ranges from 0-100. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed-bound. Higher scores reflect more severe disability. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) measures patients' degree of disability related to lower back pain. The ODI has 10 items (Pain, self-care, bring, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex, social, and travelling). After adding up the total score of each item, the initial total score is 0 to 50 points. Then divide the total score by 5 and multiply by 20 to get the final score of 0 to 100.

    6. Promis Score - Pain [Preop to post op comparison of PROMIS instruments at 6 weeks and 6 months.]

      Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), this 8-item, self-reported tool will assess a person's level of confidence to manage/control symptoms, to manage their symptoms in different settings and to keep symptoms from interfering with work, sleep, relationships or recreational activities. Each question usually has five response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. The total raw score for a measure is converted to into a T-score for each participant. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

    7. Promis Score - Physical Activity [Preop to post op comparison of PROMIS instruments at 6 weeks and 6 months.]

      Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), this 8-item, self-reported tool will assess a person's level of confidence to manage/control symptoms, to manage their symptoms in different settings and to keep symptoms from interfering with work, sleep, relationships or recreational activities. Each question usually has five response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. The total raw score for a measure is converted to into a T-score for each participant. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

    8. Promis Score - Physical Function [Preop to post op comparison of PROMIS instruments at 6 weeks and 6 months.]

      Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), this 8-item, self-reported tool will assess a person's level of confidence to manage/control symptoms, to manage their symptoms in different settings and to keep symptoms from interfering with work, sleep, relationships or recreational activities. Each question usually has five response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. The total raw score for a measure is converted to into a T-score for each participant. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

    9. Time to mobilization [From the end of surgery until the date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 1 month.]

      The amount of time needed from the completion of surgery until the patient is ambulating out of bed

    10. Time to oral intake [From the end of surgery until the date of oral intake, assessed up to 2 weeks.]

      The amount of time needed from the completion of surgery until the patient is able to take food or drink orally

    11. Change in Coronal Cobb Angle [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Standard radiographic description of standing scoliosis x-ray made using the Cobb angle measured in degrees. Assessed pre and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 6 months

    12. Change in Degrees of Apical Vertebra Rotation [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Standard radiographic description of the change between standing scoliosis x-ray made using the Apical Vertebra's Rotation measured in degrees. Assessed pre and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 6 months

    13. Change in Thoracic Kyphosis (TK) [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Standard radiographic description of standing scoliosis x-ray made using the Thoracic Kyphosis (TK) measured in degrees. Assessed pre and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 6 months

    14. Change in Lumbar Lordosis (LL) [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Standard radiographic description of standing scoliosis x-ray made using the Lumbar Lordosis (LL) measured in degrees. Assessed pre and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 6 months

    15. Change in Sacral Slope (SS) [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Standard radiographic description of standing scoliosis x-ray made using the Sacral Slope (SS) measured in degrees. Assessed pre and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 6 months

    16. Change in Pelvic Tilt (PT) [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Standard radiographic description of standing scoliosis x-ray made using the Pelvic Tilt (PT) measured in degrees. Assessed pre and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 6 months

    17. Change in Pelvic Incidence (PI) [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Standard radiographic description of standing scoliosis x-ray made using the Pelvic Incidence (PI) measured in degrees. Assessed pre and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 6 months

    18. Change in Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) Measurement [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) measurement assessed using standing scoliosis x-ray and reported in centimeters

    19. Change in Coronal Imbalance Measurement [Within 6 months pre-operatively and up to 6 months postoperatively]

      Coronal Imbalance measurement assessed using standing scoliosis x-ray and reported in centimeters

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with a diagnosis of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) Scoliosis (M41.9) category.

    • Patients undergoing a > 5 level arthrodesis using one of the following Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coded procedures 22534, 22585, 22614, 22632, 22634 with either 22842, 22853

    • Cobb angle > 10 degrees

    • Failure of 3 months of conservative management

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Prior scoliosis surgery not performed at UNC Chapel Hill Hospital Facilities

    • Deformity correction due to trauma

    • History of neoplastic spine disease

    • Patients with active osteomyelitis

    • Patients with prior cement augmentation.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 UNC Chapel Hill Hospital Chapel Hill North Carolina United States 27514

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
    • North Carolina Spine Society

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Andrew Abumoussa, MD MSc, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04538092
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 20-1705
    First Posted:
    Sep 3, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 23, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 23, 2022