Screening Nutritional Status of Hospitalized Patients

Sponsor

TC Erciyes University (Other)

Overall Status

Completed

CT.gov ID

NCT04798807

Collaborator

(none)

134

Enrollment

Actual Duration (Months)

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study investigated the results of the nutritional status of hospitalized patients with Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) screening and compared the effects of two screening method in predicting malnutrition.

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Malnourishment	Diagnostic Test: Nutritional screening

Detailed Description

In the cross-sectional study demographic data, body mass index (BMI), length of hospital stay (LOS), and cause of hospitalization of hospitalized patients were recorded. For the nutritional assessment all patients were screened with NRS 2002 and SGA within the first days of admission to the patients. The primary predictors of interest in our study were the NRS 2002 and SGA results of patients.

Study Design

Study Type:

Observational

Actual Enrollment :

134 participants

Observational Model:

Cohort

Time Perspective:

Cross-Sectional

Official Title:

Screening Nutritional Status of Hospitalized Patients With Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and Subjective Global Assessment Tools

Actual Study Start Date :

Jan 1, 2016

Actual Primary Completion Date :

Aug 30, 2016

Actual Study Completion Date :

Aug 30, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/Treatment
Hospitalized non-critical services patients Patients, who were hospitalized in the clinics (hematology, neurology, gastroenterology, nephrology, endocrine, pulmonary disease and cardiology) of Malatya Training and Research Hospital, were screened both Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tools within the first days of admission to the patients. The nutritional status of patients categorized according the screening tools. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) : The patients were classified as being nutritionally risk (NRS+): total score ≥ 3 or nutritionally risk-free (NRS-): total score < 3 according to NRS 2002 results. Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) The SGA screening provides three alternative categories for nutritional classification: well nourished (A); mild-to-moderately malnourished (B); or severely malnourished (C).	Diagnostic Test: Nutritional screening

Arm

Intervention/Treatment

Hospitalized non-critical services patients

Patients, who were hospitalized in the clinics (hematology, neurology, gastroenterology, nephrology, endocrine, pulmonary disease and cardiology) of Malatya Training and Research Hospital, were screened both Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tools within the first days of admission to the patients. The nutritional status of patients categorized according the screening tools. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) : The patients were classified as being nutritionally risk (NRS+): total score ≥ 3 or nutritionally risk-free (NRS-): total score < 3 according to NRS 2002 results. Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) The SGA screening provides three alternative categories for nutritional classification: well nourished (A); mild-to-moderately malnourished (B); or severely malnourished (C).

Diagnostic Test: Nutritional screening

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

Identifying malnourishment according to the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 [First 48 hours of hospitalization]
The results of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002): The patients were classified as being nutritionally risk (NRS+): total score ≥ 3 or nutritionally risk-free (NRS-): total score < 3 according to NRS 2002 results.
Identifying malnourishment according to the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) [First 48 hours of hospitalization]
The results of the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA): The SGA screening provides three alternative categories for nutritional classification: well nourished (A); mild-to-moderately malnourished (B); or severely malnourished (C).
Compare the results of two screening tools. [Through study completion, an average of 1 year]
Compare the results of NRS-2002 and SGA tools on predicting malnutrition and nutritional status of patients.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:

18 Years and Older

Sexes Eligible for Study:

All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

Inclusion Criteria:

≥18 years old
non-bed-dependent
non-critİcal service patients

Exclusion Criteria:

< 18 years old,
hospitalized due to surgical operation,
pregnant women,
breastfeeding women,
bed-dependent,
suffered an advanced disease that required palliative care.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

TC Erciyes University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan - Dec 1, 2016

More Information

Publications

None provided.

Responsible Party:

Neşe Kaya, Investigator, TC Erciyes University

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT04798807

Other Study ID Numbers:

2016/144

First Posted:

Mar 15, 2021

Last Update Posted:

Mar 15, 2021

Last Verified:

Mar 1, 2021

Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:

Plan to Share IPD:

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:

Keywords provided by Neşe Kaya, Investigator, TC Erciyes University

Nutritional assessment

Nutritional Risk Screening 2002

Subjective Global Assessment.

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Malnutrition

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 15, 2021