Secondary Haplo HSCT for Relapse After Initial Allogeneic HSCT

Sponsor
University Hospital Tuebingen (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01997918
Collaborator
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich (Other), University Hospital Augsburg (Other)
60
51

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of natural killer (NK)-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative HLA identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of NK-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2. We will describe and quantify the specific patient, donor, treatment, graft and outcomes characteristics associated with the course of treatment. To assess and control for the bias that is associated with the retrospective nature of this study, we will emphasize to collect clearly stated reasons for the decision to use a haploidentical transplant, e.g. as opposed to drug therapy or a second transplant from the original or an alternative HLA identical donor. This is a retrospective observational cohort study. German centers performing allogeneic HSCT are asked to contribute. Data will be validated and missing information will be further retrieved by the four principal investigators through phone. Final follow up will be performed in April 2014, 2014. To be able to supply durable data on the primary endpoints, only patients receiving a haploidentical HSCT2 between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013 will be included.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    60 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Retrospective
    Official Title:
    Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in the Treatment of Relapse After a First Allogeneic HSCT: a Retrospective Cohort Study by the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Oct 1, 2013
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Dec 30, 2017
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Dec 30, 2017

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Treatment related mortality (TRM) of haploidentical HSCT2 [up to day 365]

    2. Toxicity of haploidentical HSCT2 [up to day 365]

      NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. complete remission (CR) rate after haploidentical HSCT2 [day 100]

    2. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2 [2 years]

    3. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical HSCT2 [2 years]

    4. Incidence of rejection after haploidentical HSCT2 [1 year]

    5. Disease free survival (DFS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2 [2 years]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age >18 years at time of HSCT2

    • Malignant hematologic disease

    • Informed consent signed by the patients on the use of data in registry analyses

    • 1st allogeneic HSCT performed from any donor, including haploidentical HSCT1

    • Hematological or extramedullary relapse after HSCT1

    • Haploidentical 2nd allogeneic HSCT (i.e. >= 2 Antigen mismatch family donor) between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013

    Third or higher allogeneic HSCT does not preclude analysis as long as HSCT2 was haploidentical.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Hospital Tuebingen
    • Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
    • University Hospital Augsburg

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Wolfgang A Bethge, MD, University Hospital Tuebingen
    • Principal Investigator: Christoph Schmid, MD, University Hospital Augsburg
    • Principal Investigator: Johanna Tischer, MD, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital Munich
    • Principal Investigator: Maximilian Christopeit, MD, University Hospital of Halle

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University Hospital Tuebingen
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01997918
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • KTS 2. Haplo HSCT
    First Posted:
    Nov 28, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    May 3, 2018
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2018
    Keywords provided by University Hospital Tuebingen
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 3, 2018