IsoCOMFORT: Effect & Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane vs IV Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children 3-17 Years Old

Sponsor
Sedana Medical (Industry)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04684238
Collaborator
(none)
160
24
2
25.5
6.7
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane delivered by the AnaConDa-S versus intravenous midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated children admitted to an intensive care unit.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This is a phase III, multi-centre, prospective, randomized, active-controlled, assessor-blind study. Primary endpoint: percentage of time of adequately maintained sedation, in absence of rescue sedation, within the COMFORT-B interval (light, moderate, or deep sedation) prescribed at randomization, monitored every 2 hours for an expected minimum of 12 hours (up to 48 hours).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
160 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomised Active-controlled Study to Compare Efficacy & Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered by the AnaConDa-S (Anaesthetic Conserving Device) vs IV Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Paediatric Patients 3-17 Years Old
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 14, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Drug: Midazolam

Midazolam for sedation in the ICU

Drug: Midazolam
Solution for Injection/Infusion

Experimental: Drug: Isoflurane

Volatile for sedation in the ICU

Drug: Isoflurane
Inhalation vapour, liquid. Isoflurane delivered by the AnaConDa-S (Anaesthetic Conserving Device)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of time adequate sedation depth [Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).]

    To compare the percentage of time adequate sedation depth is maintained within the individually prescribed target range in absence of rescue sedation as assessed according to the COMFORT-B scale, in isoflurane vs midazolam treated paediatric patients for an expected minimum of 12 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Compare the use of opiates [Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).]

    Compare the use of opiates, and the development of tolerance to the sedative regimen as measured by the change in dose of study drug,opiates and other analgesics, over time in isoflurane- vs midazolam treated patients.

  2. Compare the need for rescue sedatives [Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).]

    Compare the need for rescue sedatives and other sedatives in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.

  3. Compare time from sedation termination to extubation [Time from end of study drug administration to extubation]

    Compare time from sedation termination to extubation in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.

  4. Compare the proportion of time with spontaneous breathing [During study treatment]

    Compare the proportion of time with spontaneous breathing in isoflurane- vs midazolam treated patients.

  5. Evaluate haemodynamic effect as indicated by inotropic/vasopressor agent [During study treatment period compared to baseline]

    Evaluate haemodynamic effect as indicated by inotropic/vasopressor agent administration in patients sedated with isoflurane compared with midazolam.

  6. Evaluate the frequency of withdrawal symptom [Patients exposed > 96 hours sedation (including pre-study sedation period) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.]

    Evaluate the frequency of withdrawal symptoms in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.

  7. Evaluate the frequency of delirium [Patients admitted to the ICU ≥48 hours (including period prior to study enrolment) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.]

    Evaluate the frequency of delirium in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients

  8. Evaluate the frequency of neurological symptoms or psychomotor dysfunction [During study treatment and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolam]

    Evaluate the frequency of neurological symptoms or psychomotor dysfunction during and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolam treatment, and the association with duration of treatment, and total exposure (MAC hours and midazolam doses) over time.

  9. Compare the 30 days/hospital mortality [From start of study treatment up to 30 days]

    Compare the 30 days/hospital mortality in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients

  10. Compare ventilator-free days [From start of study treatment up to 30 days]

    Compare ventilator-free days up to 30 days in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.

  11. Compare the time in ICU/hospital [From start of study treatment up to 30 days]

    Compare the time in ICU/hospital up to 30 days in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.

  12. Compare ICU-free days [From start of study treatment up to 30 days]

    Compare ICU-free days up to 30 days in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.

  13. Compare the safety profile [Baseline to end of study treatment, safety lab from baseline up to 48hrs post treatment, AEs from start study treatment up to day 30]

    Compare the safety profile in terms of experienced adverse events, safety laboratory values, blood gases, vital signs, body temperature and urinary output in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Exploratory objective [During study treatment]

    Determine the isoflurane dosage, end-tidal concentrations and infusion rates, and the midazolam dosage, required for adequate sedation in mechanically ventilated paediatric patients.

  2. Exploratory objective [During study treatment]

    Evaluate frequency and type of AnaConDa-S device deficiencies when used for sedating patients with isoflurane.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
3 Years to 17 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients at least 3 years to 17 (less than 18) years at the time of randomization, admitted to an ICU/with planned ICU admission.

  • Expected mechanical (invasive) ventilation and sedation for at least 12 hours.

  • Informed consent obtained from the patient, patient's legal guardian(s)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Ongoing seizures requiring acute treatment.

  • Continuous sedation for more than 72 hours at time of randomization.

  • Less than 24 hours post cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

  • Uncompensated circulatory shock.

  • Known or suspected genetic susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia.

  • Patients with acute asthma or obstructive lung disease symptoms requiring treatment at inclusion.

  • Patient with tidal volume below 30 mL or above 800 mL.

  • Inability to perform reliable COMFORT-B assessment in the opinion of the Investigator

  • Patients with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring or with suspected increase in ICP

  • Patients with treatment-induced whole-body hypothermia.

  • Patients with pheochromocytoma.

  • Patients with prolonged QT interval or with significant risk for prolonged QT interval.

  • Patient not expected to survive next 48 hours or not committed to full medical care.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU Amiens-Picardie Site Sud Amiens France
2 Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant Groupe Hospitalier Est Lyon France
3 CHU de NANTES, Hôpital Mère-Enfant Nantes France
4 Hopital Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades Paris France
5 Hôpital Robert-Debré AP-HP Paris France
6 Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien Trousseau La Roche-Guyon Paris France
7 Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud Site Bicetre Paris France
8 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims Reims France
9 Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg Hôpital de Hautepierre Strasbourg France
10 Universitätsklinikum Köln Cologne Germany
11 Universitätsklinik Freiburg Freiburg Germany
12 Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg Germany
13 Universitätsklinikum Jena Jena Germany
14 Klinikum Kassel Kassel Germany
15 Hospital Materno Infantil Sant Joan de Deu Hospital Barcelona Spain
16 Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía Córdoba Spain
17 Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
18 Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Madrid Spain
19 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain
20 Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid Spain
21 Hospital Regional Universitario, Carlos Haya Málaga Spain
22 Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio de Sevilla Sevilla Spain
23 Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe Valencia Spain
24 Karolinska Universitetssjukhus Solna Solna Sweden

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sedana Medical

Investigators

  • Study Director: Magnus Falkenhav, MD, Sedana Medical

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Sedana Medical
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04684238
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SED002
First Posted:
Dec 24, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Mar 18, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sedana Medical
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 18, 2022