Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)

Sponsor
Sedana Medical (Industry)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05327296
Collaborator
(none)
235
1
2
18
13.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S device system versus intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, assessor-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled isoflurane delivered via the Sedaconda ACD-S compared to intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated Intensive Care Unit (ICU) adult patients.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
235 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 30, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 15, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Isoflurane

Inhaled isoflurane administered via Sedaconda ACD-S

Drug: Isoflurane
Inhaled isoflurane administered by Sedaconda ACD-S

Active Comparator: Propofol

Propofol administered as intravenous infusion

Drug: Propofol
Intravenous infusion of propofol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of time adequate sedation depth [During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours]

    To compare the percentage of time sedation depth is maintained within the target range, in absence of rescue sedation, as assessed according to the RASS scale, in isoflurane- vs propofol-treated patients

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Key Secondary: Compare the use of opioids [During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on use of opioids during the study drug treatment period measuring CPOT

  2. Key Secondary: Compare the wake up time [Time from stop of study drug treatment up to 4 hours]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on the wake up time at end of study drug treatment

  3. Key Secondary: Compare the cognitive recovery after EOT [60 minutes after EOT]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on cognitive recovery after EOT by measuring CAM-ICU-7

  4. Key Secondary: Compare the spontaneous breathing effort [During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on spontaneous breathing effort during the study drug treatment period by measuring • Airway occlusion pressure, pressure support or if observed respiratory rate exceeds set respiratory rate

  5. Other secondary: Compare time from sedation termination to extubation [During study treatment]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on time from sedation termination to extubation in patients for whom study drug is terminated for extubation

  6. Other secondary: Compare days alive and free of mechanical ventilation through Study Day 30 [From start of study treatment up to 30 days]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on days alive and free of mechanical ventilation through Study Day 30

  7. Other secondary: Compare days alive and free of the ICU [From start of study treatment up to 30 days]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on days alive and free of the ICU

  8. Other secondary: Compare delirium and coma free days until 7 days after EOT [From start of study treatment until 7 days after EOT]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on delirium and coma free days until 7 days after EOT

  9. Other secondary: Compare mortality at 30 days after randomization [Until 30 days after randomization]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on mortality at 30 days after randomization

  10. Other secondary: Compare mortality at 3 months after randomization [Until 3 months after randomization]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on mortality at 3 months after randomization

  11. Other secondary: Compare mortality at 6 months after randomization [Until 6 months after randomization]

    To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on mortality at 6 months after randomization

  12. Other secondary: To compare the safety profile of isoflurane vs propofol [Baseline to end of study treatment, safety lab from baseline up to 48hrs post treatment, AEs from start study treatment up to day 30]

    To compare the safety profile of isoflurane vs propofol in respect to reported Adverse Event

  13. Other secondary: To assess Sedaconda ACD-S device deficiencies in patients receiving isoflurane [During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours]

    To assess Sedaconda ACD-S device deficiencies in patients receiving isoflurane by Sedaconda ACD-S by reported Adverse Event

  14. Other secondary: To compare the use of restraints in patients receiving isoflurane vs propofol [During study treatment up to 48 (±6) hours]

    Incidence of restraints measured twice daily

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adults ≥18 years of age;

  • Patients who are anticipated to require >12 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation in the ICU; and

  • Receipt of continuous sedation due to clinical need for sedation to RASS <0.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Need for RASS -5;

  • Sedation for invasive mechanical ventilation immediately prior to Baseline for >72 hours;

  • Severe neurological condition before ICU admission that causes the patient to lack ability to participate in the study (ie, unable to be assessed for RASS and CPOT);

  • Ventilator tidal volume <200 or >1000 mL at Baseline;

  • Need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R), high frequency oscillation ventilation (HFOV), or high frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) at Screening;

  • Comfort care only (end of life care);

  • Contraindication to propofol or isoflurane;

  • Known or family history of MH;

  • Severe hemodynamic compromise, defined as the need for norepinephrine ≥0.3 mcg/kg/min (or equivalent vasopressor dose) to maintain blood pressure within acceptable range, assumed to be mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg unless prescribed clinically;

  • Allergy to isoflurane or propofol, or have propofol infusion syndrome.

  • History of ventricular tachycardia/Long QT Syndrome;

  • Requirement of IV benzodiazepine or barbiturate administration for seizures or dependencies, including alcohol withdrawal

  • Neuromuscular disease that impairs spontaneous ventilation (eg, C5 or higher spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc);

  • Concurrent enrollment in another study that, in the Investigator's opinion, would impact the patient's safety or assessments of this study;

  • Participation in other study involving investigational drug(s) or devices(s) within 30 days prior to Randomization;

  • Anticipated requirement of treatment with continuous infusion of a neuromuscular blocking agent for >4 hours;

  • Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding;

  • Imperative need for continuous active humidification through mechanical ventilation circuit;

  • Attending physician's refusal to include the patient; or

  • Inability to obtain informed consent.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 The New York and Presbyterian Hospital New York New York United States 10032

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sedana Medical

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeremy Beitler, M.D., Columbia University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

Responsible Party:
Sedana Medical
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05327296
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SED004
First Posted:
Apr 14, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 15, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sedana Medical
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 15, 2022