EffaceQ: Selected Site Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Cardiac Resynchronization Patients With Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads

Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01484613
Collaborator
(none)
337
16
31
21.1
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Cardiac resynchronization (CRT) therapy is well established for treatment of patients with severe heartfailure, reduced left ventricular (LV) function and ventricular dyssynchrony. Roughly 1/3 of CRT patients do not improve after CRT implant. One possible reason is interruption of biventricular pacing. This might be caused by several conditions, including elevated left ventricular (LV) pacing thresholds or presence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). CRT devices with quadripolar LV leads offer 10 LV pacing vectors to choose from. It's the aim of this prospective observational study to investigate efficacy and reliability of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with quadripolar left ventricular leads.

Hypothesis: In more than 90% of patients, who received a CRT system with quadripolar LV lead, at least one acceptable LV lead vector is available.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: quadripolar LV lead (Quartet)

Detailed Description

Definition of an acceptable lead vector: Any LV pacing vector that complies in both tested body positions (left lateral position and sitting) with both criteria:

  1. Phrenic nerve stimulation threshold is at least twice as high as LV pacing threshold

  2. LV pacing threshold is less or equals 2.5Volts (V) @0.5 milliseconds (ms)

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
337 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Only
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients With Quadripolar LV Leads
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Quadripolar lead

All participants receive a CRT-D system with quadripolar lead

Device: quadripolar LV lead (Quartet)
All participants will receive CRT-D system with a quadripolar lead. This lead offers 10 LV lead vectors to choose from
Other Names:
  • Quartet
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of patients with at least one acceptable lead vector [Pre hospital discharge (PHD) to 3 months]

      Definition of acceptable lead vector: Any LV vector that complies in both tested body positions with both criteria: Phrenic nerve stimulation threshold is at least twice as high as LV pacing threshold LV pacing threshold is less or equals 2.5V@0.5ms

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Quality of Life [Baseline to 3 months]

      Minnesota living with heart failure questionaire

    2. Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) [PHD to 3 months]

      Incidence of PNS per LV pacing vector Freedom from PNS for the permanently programmed LV vector

    3. LV pacing thresholds [PHD to 3 months]

      LV pacing thresholds per LV vector Incidence of elevated (>2.5V/0.5ms) LV pacing thresholds per LV vector

    4. Number of acceptable LV lead vectors per patient [PHD to 3 months]

    5. Finally programmed LV lead vector [PHD to 3 months]

      Need for reprogramming Percentage of patients with conventional (bipolar) and extended (quadripolar) LV vectors

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Indication for implantation of a CRT-D

    • Age >= 18 years

    • Written informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Already implanted LV or coronary sinus lead

    • Previous unsuccessful LV lead implant attempt

    • Patient is eligible for heart transplantation

    • Comorbidities that results in life expectancy of less than 12 months

    • Known pregnancy

    • Inability to provide written patient informed consent

    • Participation to another study with active treatment arm (i.e. randomized studies etc...)

    • Patient is not willing or is not able to visit the study center for the study assessments within the first 3 months after implant

    • Patient is not able to understand or answer the quality of life questionaire

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Klinikum Coburg GmbH Coburg Germany 96450
    2 Krankenhaus Mörsenbroich-Rath GmbH Düsseldorf Germany 40472
    3 Klinikum Esslingen Esslingen Germany 73730
    4 Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien Frankfurt am Main Germany 60389
    5 Universitätsklinik Freiburg Freiburg Germany 79106
    6 Herz- und Gefäßzentrum am Krankenhaus Neu-Bethlehem Göttingen Germany 37073
    7 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover Germany 30625
    8 Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk Köln Germany 51103
    9 Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein gGmbH Ludwigshafen Germany 67063
    10 St.-Marien-Hospital GmbH Lünen Germany 44534
    11 Klinikum Magdeburg gGmbH Magdeburg Germany 39130
    12 Marien-Hospital Marl Germany 45768
    13 Klinikum Großhadern der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München München Germany 81377
    14 Universitätsklinikum Münster Münster Germany 48149
    15 Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital Osnabrück Osnabrück Germany 49074
    16 Klinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben GmbH Quedlinburg Germany 06484

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Abbott Medical Devices

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Johannes Brachmann, Prof., Klinikum Coburg GmbH

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Abbott Medical Devices
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01484613
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • H56
    First Posted:
    Dec 2, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 4, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2019
    Keywords provided by Abbott Medical Devices
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 4, 2019