Self-Affirmation and Defensiveness to Health Messages for the Self vs. a Close Other

Sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02317380
Collaborator
(none)
1,019
1
45.2
22.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Background:
  • Researchers want to learn about people s beliefs and values. They also want to learn about how people respond to information about cancer risk. They have created two short studies. They have combined these studies for convenience.
Objective:
  • To learn about people s beliefs and values, and about how people respond to information about cancer risk.
Eligibility:
  • Adults age 40-70 who are overweight, have never had cancer, and have an opposite-sex close relationship with someone in that age group who is also overweight.
Design:
  • This study will take place online or in a laboratory.

  • Participants will take part in two studies. One is Values Study. The other is Cancer Risk Information.

  • In Values Study, some participants will choose the most important value from a list. They will write about why that value is important to them. Others will choose the least important value from a list. They will write about why that value may be important to someone else.

  • In Cancer Risk Information, participants will read a health message about a cancer risk relevant to themselves or to a close other. Some will wear special glasses that track their eye movements as they read.

  • Participants will then answer questions about their beliefs about cancer risk and their intentions to lose weight.

  • Both studies will take 30 minutes.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Self-affirmation, a process by which individuals reflect on cherished personal values is a potent means of augmenting the effectiveness of threatening health communications. Individuals tend to be defensive against information suggesting their behavior puts them at risk for disease or negative health. Previous evidence suggests that self-affirmation may reduce defensiveness to threatening health information, increasing openness to the message and resulting in increased disease risk perceptions, disease-related worry, intentions to engage in preventive behavior, and actual behavioral change. One mechanism by which self-affirmation may be effective is by reducing self-focus and expanding self-concept. If this is the case, self-affirmation may not be effective in reducing defensiveness against information that is threatening to one s close other. We are proposing two studies to examine whether self-affirmation is equally effective at reducing defensiveness against threatening information for the self and for a close other. These studies will not only highlight conditions under which self-affirmation is effective, but also shed light on mechanisms underlying the effect.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    1019 participants
    Observational Model:
    Ecologic or Community
    Time Perspective:
    Cross-Sectional
    Official Title:
    Self-Affirmation and Defensiveness to Health Messages for the Self vs. a Close Other
    Study Start Date :
    Dec 13, 2014
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Nov 10, 2015
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Sep 18, 2018

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Intentions to lose weight/ talk to doctor [Immediately post-experiment]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    40 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    • INCLUSION CRITERIA

    For Study 1

    -Knowledge Networks panel members will be eligible if they are aged 40-70, overweight, and

    have never been diagnosed with cancer (to ensure relevance to breast and prostate cancer risk, the topic of

    the health message). Individuals will also be screened for inclusion based on whether they report having

    an opposite-sex close relationship with another adult age 40-70 who is also overweight (e.g., opposite-sex

    spouse, close friend, or family member).

    For Study 2

    -Community individuals will be subject to the same inclusion criteria.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 National Cancer Institute (NCI), 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda Maryland United States 20892

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Rebecca A Ferrer, Ph.D., National Cancer Institute (NCI)

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02317380
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 999915034
    • 15-C-N034
    First Posted:
    Dec 16, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 20, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Sep 18, 2018
    Keywords provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI)

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 20, 2018