Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Several approaches for summative assessment during Advanced Life Support courses are used. The most commonly used method during European Resuscitation (ERC) Council Life Support Courses is that 1 instructor is miming a whole team, and the candidate has to lead this "team" through a scenario; another variant of the summative assessment (mainly used by American Heart Association (AHA) Courses) is with a group of students, where one student is the team leader to be assessed and the others are his team not being assessed. The second approach might be more realistic; however there is no evidence around with regard to effectiveness (pass/fail rate, ability to test non-technical skills (NTS)) or participant/assessor satisfaction.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: ERC Assessment as used by the European Resuscitation Council |
Other: assessment
different assessments in both arms
|
Other: AHA Assessment as used by the American Heart Association |
Other: assessment
different assessments in both arms
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Team leadership [1 minute after the assessment is completed]
Subjective rating of team leadership
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All medical students at the University of Bern, study year 2017/2018, 5th and 6th study year
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Bern | Bern | Switzerland |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
Investigators
- Study Chair: Robert Greif, University of Bern, Switzerland
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- ILS_2017/2018