Self-Stigma of Mental and Physical Health

Sponsor
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04415437
Collaborator
(none)
823
1
8.8
93.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

People with mental disorders often suffer from self-stigmatization. Self-stigma is associated with several negative outcomes such as low quality of life, lower rates of help-seeking as well as poorer treatment adherence. However, a lot of questionnaires only focus on specific mental disorders. There is no valid measurement which can be used for all kinds of mental disorders.

Furthermore, much less is known about self-stigma in people with organic diseases. Only little attention has been given to those who may experience self-stigma because of their physical condition. A main reason for this may be the lack of a valid measurement of self-stigma among people with physical health issues.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop and validate a self-report scale which is capable to do both - measuring self-stigma among people with all mental disorders and among people with physical health issues.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Items are derived from the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) and the Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes (BIAS) Map. Psychometric evaluation includes testing the reliability (intern consistency, test-retest reliability) and validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, construct validity incl. convergent and discriminant validity, criterion-related validity).

    Participants take part in an online survey. They answer general questions about their mental and physical health condition and complete measurements of quality of life, mental health, depression, public stigma, expected stigma, self-stigma, intention to seek help and actual help seeking (behavior).

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    823 participants
    Observational Model:
    Case-Control
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Self-Stigma of Mental and Physical Health: Developing and Validation of a Universal Self-Stigma Scale (USSS)
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Nov 4, 2019
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Jun 30, 2020
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Jul 30, 2020

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    healthy

    Healthy participants

    mentally ill

    Participants with mental disorders

    physically ill

    Participants with organic disease

    mentally and physically ill

    Participants with mental disorders and organic disease

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Development of the Universal Self-Stigma Scale (USSS) [Baseline]

      Questionnaire is based on the Stereotype Content Model (Fiske et al., 2002) and BIAS-Map (Cuddy et al., 2007) and includes three components: stereotype (warmth, competence [lower scores indicate higher self-stigma]), prejudice (emotions, e.g. contempt, pity, anger, shame [higher scores indicate higher self-stigma]), discrimination (active/passive self-harm [higher scores indicate higher self-stigma]). Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale. Item selection via qualitative and statistical methods, e.g. item difficulty index, item discrimination index, exploratory factor analysis (EFA).

    2. Universal Self-Stigma Scale (USSS): Validity [Baseline]

      Validation process includes confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the statistical model fit with goodness of fit indices. Convergent validity is tested with another measurement for self-stigma (ISMI) using Pearson correlations [higher correlations indicate better convergent validity]. Discriminant validity is tested with Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and public stigma [lower correlations indicate better discriminant validity], criterion validity with actual help seeking behavior and health related quality of life (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-12) using Pearson correlations as well [higher correlations indicate better criterion validity].

    3. Universal Self-Stigma Scale (USSS): Internal consistency [Baseline]

      Internal consistency is tested with Cronbach's Alpha (0-1; higher scores indicate better internal consistency)

    4. Change on Universal Self-Stigma Scale (USSS): Test-Retest Reliability [Baseline and 4 weeks]

      Test-Retest Reliability (Pearson Correlation, 0-1; higher scores indicate better reliability)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Intention to Seek Help [Baseline]

      Questionaire (e.g. Yu et al., 2015) to describe the intention to seek help because of severe psychological or mental health problems as well as physical health problems (e.g. "If you had severe mental health problems, would you seek help from professional sources for them?", scores from 1 [definitely yes] to 4 [definitely no]; lower scores indicate higher intentions to seek help). Reasons for not seeking help because of psychological health problems (e.g. "I want to solve problems by myself.") are assessed by binary items (yes, no).

    2. Actual Help Seeking Behavior [Baseline and 4 weeks]

      8 Items to assess actual help seeking behavior. It is asked if participants have ever sought services from any professional and if they have been in therapy or received medical treatment because of psychological or physical health problems. As well as if they are using any of these services currently. Items are binary (yes, no).

    3. 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) [Baseline]

      Self-report measure of health related quality of life; norm-based scores (M=50, SD=10) for Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), higher score indicates better health state

    4. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) [Baseline]

      Self-report inventory used to screen for mental health disorders (depression, anxiety, alcohol, eating, somatoform disorders), including severity scores for depressive symptoms (0-29), anxiety symptoms (0-21) and somatic symptoms (0-30), where higher scores indicate more serve symptoms

    5. Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) [Baseline]

      Self-report measure of depressed mood; higher total scores indicate more servere symptoms; total score (0-63); cut-offs for interpretation 0-13 (minimal depression), 14-19 (mild depression), 20-28 (moderate depression), 29-63 (severe depression)

    6. Public Stigma [Baseline]

      Measuring public stigma including stereotype (cognition - warmth, competence), prejudice (emotions - pity, envy, contempt, admiration) and discrimination (behavior - active/passive harm) with 19 items based on Stereotype Content Model (Fiske et al., 2002) and BIAS Map (Cuddy et al., 2007) toward people with mental or physical health problems. (e.g. "How often do you think people in general tend to feel the following emotions toward people with a mental disorder? [pity, contempt, envy, admiration]")

    7. Expected Stigma [Baseline and 4 weeks]

      Expectation to be stigmatized because of one's own mental and physical health condition. (e.g. "Do you expect that other people think badly of you because of your health condition?")

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Minimum Age: 18

    • Fluent in German Language

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Acute psychosis

    • Suicidal ideation

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg Marburg Germany 35032

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Philipps University Marburg Medical Center

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04415437
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2019-53k
    First Posted:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 16, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 16, 2021