Clinical Study of the L300 Versus Ankle-foot Orthosis (AFO) on Post-Stroke Subjects With Foot Drop

Sponsor
Bioness Inc (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01138995
Collaborator
Medidata Solutions (Industry), University of Cincinnati (Other)
197
11
2
33.1
17.9
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the NESS L300 (L300) in improving gait parameters, function, and quality of life among stroke subjects (greater than or equal to 3 months post stroke)with drop foot.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Ness L300
  • Device: Ankle-foot orthosis
N/A

Detailed Description

Approximately 176 subjects with stroke that have drop foot will be enrolled from approximately 10 different sites in the United States depending on the rate of enrollment. This clinical study is proposed to show that the functional electrical stimulation (FES) delivered via the Ness L300 improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, and safety for persons with stroke.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
197 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Functional Ambulation: Standard Treatment vs. Electronic Stimulation Therapy (FASTEST)Trial in Chronic Post-Stroke Subjects With Foot Drop
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) Control Group

The Control Group will walk with the a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) for 30 weeks.

Device: Ankle-foot orthosis
The Control Group will walk with a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO).
Other Names:
  • drop foot orthotic
  • Experimental: Ness L300 Treatment Group

    The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 30 weeks.

    Device: Ness L300
    The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), which improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke.
    Other Names:
  • Leg Stimulator
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Ten Meter Walk Test (10mWT) [Week 30]

      Determine gait velocity during a 10 meter walk test for subjects using the L300 versus subjects using a standard "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). Long term device effect at comfortable gait speed in m/s. Walk test results at 30 weeks will be compared to baseline speed. The mean difference (improvement) between baseline and week 30 will be presented by study arm.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score [Week 30]

      Clinical measurement of balance was recorded using the Berg Balance Scale which is a highly reliable and valid test used among persons with stroke. This Scale consists of 14 items/tasks of increasing difficulty graded on a five-point ordinal scale of zero to four where zero = participant is unable to perform the task and four = participant is independent in performance of task, such that overall total score may range from zero to 56 per participant. Mean Baseline and Mean Week 30 scores were calculated and used to determine change in mean score for each study group.

    2. User Satisfaction [Week 30]

      Total user satisfaction as measured on 12 item User Satisfaction survey with maximum score 24, minimum 0, where higher score indicated greater satisfaction with device,

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Have ankle dorsiflexion range of motion greater than or equal to neutral when assessed concurrent with test stimulation in sitting and standing and demonstrate adequate ankle and knee stability during gait at the time of screening

    • Have had at least one stroke of any etiology (e.g., ischemic, hemorrhagic,etc.) experienced greater than or equal to 3 months prior to study enrollment, as confirmed by independent medical records, and result in drop foot sufficient to require prior or current prescription for and/or use of an AFO

    • Have adequate cognition and communication abilities for informed consent, training and instructions, use of the L300, and provide feedback, to be demonstrated by either the subjects scoring greater than or equal to 24 (out of a possible 30) on the Mini Mental State Examination, or having a competent caregiver for these purposes

    • Must be 18 years or older

    • Have the ability to safely walk at least 10-meters with a maximum of 1 person assist

    • Have a self-selected 10-meter gait speed of less than or equal to 0.8m/s at the time of assessment

    • Have inadequate dorsiflexion/limb clearance or unable to achieve normal heel strike on ambulation without AFO

    • Be medically stable

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Have fixed ankle contracture at greater than or equal to 5 degrees of plantar flexion in the hemiplegic leg with the knee extended

    • Have excessive pain in the affected leg, as measured by a score greater than or equal to 4 on a 10-point visual analog scale

    • Participation, within the past 3 months, currently, or during the course of the study in any interventional clinical studies without the Sponsor's approval

    • Have a demand-type cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or any electrical or metallic implant

    • Have a lower motor neuron disease or injury with inadequate response to stimulation

    • Have significant swelling/edema in the leg extending up to the knee

    • Have a history of chronic skin problems/conditions or cancerous lesion present or suspected in close proximity ot the expected site for L300 stimulation

    • Are pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant in the next 45 weeks

    • Have had botulinum toxin(type a or b) to the hemiplegic leg or arm within the past six weeks or plan to have botulinum toxin treatments during the course of the study

    • Expectation of a significant change in the subject's spasticity medications during the course of the study for the effected leg

    • Have unstable seizure disorder (average of greater or equal to 2 seizures per month)

    • Have a pre-existing significant orthopedic conditions that are, a that investigator's discretion, determined as likely to limit ambulatory progress (e.g., total hip replacement [non-metallic], total knee replacement [non-metallic], limited lower extremity (LE) range of motion (ROM), rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, or other fracture or dislocation that underlies the expected site for L300 stimulation)

    • Have a complete hemisensory loss ipsilateral to foot drop

    • Used the L300 or other FES device for foot drop (e.g., Odstock Drop Foot System (ODFS), WalkAide by Innovation Neurotronics, etc.) for greater than or equal to 3 hours within the last 6 months prior to study enrollment

    • Have major post-stroke depression (PHQ-9 greater than or equal to 10) that is not medically managed with antidepression medication and/or psychotherapy

    • Currently or planning on participating in a neuro-rehabilitation physical therapy (PT) or occupational therapy (OT) program or new independent exercise programs with enrolled in the study. However, injury or a change in condition requiring PT or OT that would not affect gait outcomes maybe assessed by an off-site study committee, on a case-by-case basis

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center Downey California United States 90242-3496
    2 Long Beach Memorial Medical Center Long Beach California United States 90806
    3 Sharp Rehabilitation Center San Diego California United States 92123
    4 National Rehabilitation Hospital Washington District of Columbia United States 20010
    5 Brooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies Jacksonville Florida United States 32216
    6 Kansas University Medical Center Kansas City Kansas United States 66160
    7 Weill Cornell Medical Center New York New York United States 10065
    8 St.Charles Hospital & Rehabilitation Port Jefferson New York United States 11777
    9 The Drake Center /University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio United States 45216
    10 UT Southwestern Dallas Texas United States 75390-9055
    11 University of Utah, School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah United States 84132

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Bioness Inc
    • Medidata Solutions
    • University of Cincinnati

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Kari Dunning, PT, Ph.D, The Drake Center/University of Cincinnati
    • Study Chair: Michael O'Dell, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
    • Principal Investigator: Patricia Kluding, PT, Ph.D., University of Kansas
    • Principal Investigator: Steven R. Edgley, MD, University of Utah
    • Principal Investigator: Kathaleen P Brady, PT, NCS, MedStar National Rehabilitation Network
    • Principal Investigator: Trevor Paris, MD, Brooks Rehabilitation
    • Principal Investigator: Jerome Stenehjem, MD, Sharp Rehabilitation Center
    • Principal Investigator: John Thottakara, MD, UT Southwestern
    • Principal Investigator: Jun Zhang, MD, St. Charles Hospital & Rehabilitation
    • Principal Investigator: Ziyad Ayyoub, MD, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation
    • Principal Investigator: Diemha Hoang, MD, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Bioness Inc
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01138995
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CP-L300-0801, Rev. B
    First Posted:
    Jun 8, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2016

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group
    Arm/Group Description The Control Group will walk with the a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks. After 30 weeks, the Original Control Group will then be crossed over to walk with the Ness L300 for a total of 12 weeks. Ness L300: The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), which improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke. Ness L300: The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 42 weeks, and the Original Control Group will walk with a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks, then be crossed over to walk with the Ness L300 for a total of 12 weeks. The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 42 weeks. Ness L300: The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), which improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke. Ness L300: The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 42 weeks, and the Original Control Group will walk with a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks, then be crossed over to walk with the Ness L300 for a total of 12 weeks.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 98 99
    COMPLETED 88 74
    NOT COMPLETED 10 25

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group Total
    Arm/Group Description The Control Group will walk with the a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks. After 30 weeks, the Original Control Group will then be crossed over to walk with the Ness L300 for a total of 12 weeks. Ness L300: The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), which improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke. Ness L300: The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 42 weeks, and the Original Control Group will walk with a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks, then be crossed over to walk with the Ness L300 for a total of 12 weeks. The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 42 weeks. Ness L300: The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), which improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke. Ness L300: The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 42 weeks, and the Original Control Group will walk with a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks, then be crossed over to walk with the Ness L300 for a total of 12 weeks. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 98 99 197
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    61.6
    (10.9)
    60.7
    (12.2)
    61.1
    (11.6)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    31
    31.6%
    48
    48.5%
    79
    40.1%
    Male
    67
    68.4%
    51
    51.5%
    118
    59.9%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    98
    100%
    99
    100%
    197
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Ten Meter Walk Test (10mWT)
    Description Determine gait velocity during a 10 meter walk test for subjects using the L300 versus subjects using a standard "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). Long term device effect at comfortable gait speed in m/s. Walk test results at 30 weeks will be compared to baseline speed. The mean difference (improvement) between baseline and week 30 will be presented by study arm.
    Time Frame Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intent to treat analysis of 197 (98 Control and 99 Treatment) randomized subjects.
    Arm/Group Title Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group
    Arm/Group Description The Control Group will walk with the a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks. The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 30 weeks. The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), which improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke.
    Measure Participants 98 99
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [meters per second (m/s)]
    0.15
    (0.14)
    0.14
    (0.16)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Originial Control Group, Original Treatment Group
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.75
    Comments
    Method Fisher's combination test
    Comments Between group difference for entire sample
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score
    Description Clinical measurement of balance was recorded using the Berg Balance Scale which is a highly reliable and valid test used among persons with stroke. This Scale consists of 14 items/tasks of increasing difficulty graded on a five-point ordinal scale of zero to four where zero = participant is unable to perform the task and four = participant is independent in performance of task, such that overall total score may range from zero to 56 per participant. Mean Baseline and Mean Week 30 scores were calculated and used to determine change in mean score for each study group.
    Time Frame Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All randomized subjects are included in this analysis to determine change in mean score from Baseline to Week 30 in each study group.
    Arm/Group Title Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group
    Arm/Group Description The Control Group will walk with the a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks. The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 30 weeks. Ness L300: The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), which improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke.
    Measure Participants 98 99
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    3.75
    (4.62)
    1.97
    (6.08)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Originial Control Group, Original Treatment Group
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.022
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title User Satisfaction
    Description Total user satisfaction as measured on 12 item User Satisfaction survey with maximum score 24, minimum 0, where higher score indicated greater satisfaction with device,
    Time Frame Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All randomized subjects were analyzed.
    Arm/Group Title Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group
    Arm/Group Description The Control Group will walk with the a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)for 30 weeks. The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 30 weeks. The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), which improves gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke.
    Measure Participants 98 99
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    19.1
    (4.0)
    21.8
    (2.9)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Originial Control Group, Original Treatment Group
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Adverse events were collected for both study arms from Baseline to 30 weeks post-randomization.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group
    Arm/Group Description The Control Group will walk with the a "usual" ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) for 30 weeks. The Original Treatment Group will walk with the Ness L300 for 30 weeks. The Ness L300 delivers functional electrical stimulation (FES), is intended to improve gait function, stroke-specific quality of life, functionality, and safety for persons with stroke.
    All Cause Mortality
    Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 7/98 (7.1%) 15/99 (15.2%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    anemia requiring blood transfusion 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Cardiac disorders
    stroke/high blood pressure 1/98 (1%) 1 3/99 (3%) 3
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    bowel obstruction 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    General disorders
    hospitalization general complaints 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    cholecystectomy 1/98 (1%) 1 1/99 (1%) 1
    Immune system disorders
    cancer 1/98 (1%) 1 0/99 (0%) 0
    Infections and infestations
    methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Bone fracture 2/98 (2%) 2 3/99 (3%) 3
    Hemiparesis 1/98 (1%) 1 0/99 (0%) 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    mental depression and anxiety 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Renal and urinary disorders
    kidney damage due to dehydration 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    ovarian mass 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    pneumonia/respiratory 1/98 (1%) 1 1/99 (1%) 1
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Originial Control Group Original Treatment Group
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 61/98 (62.2%) 82/99 (82.8%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Atrial fibrillation or abnormal heartbeat 1/98 (1%) 1 1/99 (1%) 1
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Eye disorders
    Eye irritation and hemorrhage 1/98 (1%) 2 0/99 (0%) 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea or abdominal pain 2/98 (2%) 2 2/99 (2%) 2
    Immune system disorders
    seasonal allergies 1/98 (1%) 1 0/99 (0%) 0
    Infections and infestations
    blister, folliculitis 5/98 (5.1%) 5 7/99 (7.1%) 11
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    fall with or without injury 45/98 (45.9%) 71 56/99 (56.6%) 81
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    gout or diabetes 2/98 (2%) 2 0/99 (0%) 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    joint pain 21/98 (21.4%) 23 26/99 (26.3%) 33
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    cancer 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Nervous system disorders
    hypertonia, headache, dizziness, memory deficit 8/98 (8.2%) 9 8/99 (8.1%) 10
    Psychiatric disorders
    Fear or depression 1/98 (1%) 1 3/99 (3%) 3
    Renal and urinary disorders
    renal mass 0/98 (0%) 0 1/99 (1%) 1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    asthma, cough, bronchitis 2/98 (2%) 3 3/99 (3%) 3
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    localized skin redness, rash, irritation 35/98 (35.7%) 45 45/99 (45.5%) 68
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension and/or flushing 5/98 (5.1%) 5 4/99 (4%) 4

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Keith McBride, CTO
    Organization Bioness
    Phone 661-362-4866
    Email Keith.McBride@bioness.com
    Responsible Party:
    Bioness Inc
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01138995
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CP-L300-0801, Rev. B
    First Posted:
    Jun 8, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2016