Evaluation of the Effect of Immune Modulating Enteral Nutrition Formula

Sponsor
NewGiza University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05186480
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
2
5.8
6.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of an immune modulating enteral nutrition formula versus the regular formula on the outcomes of critically ill septic patients by assessment of clinical outcomes, immune profile, tolerability and enteral nutrition intolerance and laboratory markers

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Dietary Supplement: Neo Mune
N/A

Detailed Description

Nutritional formulas are considered important sources of the dietary components that the body requires. They contain the sources of fats, proteins and carbohydrates and compensate any vitamin and mineral deficiency.

There is a special type of formulas called the "immune-enhancing formulas", they supplement the body not only with the energy sources but also, they boost the body's immune system as they contain multiple types of amino and fatty acids.

There is an ongoing debate around the efficacy of the immune-enhancing formulas, some studies show that they make a significant difference in enhancing the clinical outcomes compared to traditional formulas while other studies showed no significant difference between the traditional formulas and immune-enhancing formula.

The immune-enhancing nutritional formula is used in enteral and oral feeding for critically ill patients. It's mainly indicated in cases of malnutrition, post surgeries and traumas and immunocompromised patients.

Its composition:

Composition in approximate %w/w Maltodextrin 42.44% Sodium caseinate 18.25% MCT oil 6.28% Arginine 5.21% Poly-dextrose 4.00% Corn oil 3.48% Glutamine 2.61% Fish oil 2.32% Minerals 1.96% Vitamins 0.86% Artificial flavor (vanilla)

This study analyzed prospectively the clinical and laboratory outcomes of critically ill sepsis patients taking regular enteral nutrition versus immune modulating formulas.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Effect of Immune Modulating Enteral Nutrition Formula Versus Regular Enteral Nutrition on the Outcome of Critically Ill Sepsis Patients. A Pilot Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 3, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 28, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: test group

they receive the immune enhancing formula

Dietary Supplement: Neo Mune
Neo-mune is a nutritional formula used in enteral feeding for critically ill patients. It's mainly indicated in cases of malnutrition, post surgeries and traumas and immunocompromisation. Its composition: Composition in approximate %w/w Maltodextrin 42.44% Sodium caseinate 18.25% MCT oil 6.28% Arginine 5.21% Polydextrose 4.00% Corn oil 3.48% Glutamine 2.61% Fish oil 2.32% Minerals 1.96% Vitamins 0.86% Artificial flavor (vanilla)

No Intervention: control group

they receive the conventional formula

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Intensive Care Unit mortality [28 days]

    The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score

  2. severity of disease classification [28 days]

    acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score

  3. critical care need [28 days]

    days on oxygen supply

  4. inflammatory markers [28 days]

    C-Reactive protein

  5. immune profile [28 days]

    C-Reactive protein

  6. fluid status [28 days]

    albumin

  7. oxygen supply [28 days]

    arterial blood gases

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosed with sepsis according to guideline criteria AND

  • Age ≥18 years

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Gastrointestinal tract complications or intestinal failure or any contraindications to receive enteral nutrition

  • Hemodynamic instability on admission

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 NewGizaU Cairo Egypt

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • NewGiza University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nada H Farrag, Msc, NewGiza University (NGU)- School of Pharmacy

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Rana Muhammed, Principle Investigator, NewGiza University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05186480
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NewGizaU
First Posted:
Jan 11, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jan 19, 2022
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Rana Muhammed, Principle Investigator, NewGiza University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 19, 2022