Evaluation of Hemodynamic Effects of Cascade Hemofiltration in Septic Shock

Sponsor
Baxter Healthcare Corporation (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00922870
Collaborator
Gambro Lundia AB (Industry)
60
5
2
47
12
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Septic shock is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. Septic Shock is associated with an overwhelming, systemic overflow of pro inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators, which leads to generalized endothelial damage, multiple organ failure, and altered cellular immunological responsiveness. Although our understanding of the complex pathophysiological alterations that occur in septic shock has increased greatly as a result of recent clinical and preclinical studies, mortality associated with the disorder remains unacceptably high, ranging from 30% to 50%. To date, attempts to improve survival with innovative, predominantly anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies have been disappointing. A standard hemofiltration rate of 35 ml/kg/hour has been successfully used to treat acute renal failure. However, this dose does not alter plasma levels of inflammatory mediators, suggesting that its ability to clear these mediators is suboptimal. Higher doses of hemofiltration (up to 120 ml/kg per hour) have been demonstrated to improve cardiac function and hemodynamics in several animal models of sepsis. High-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) was thus conceived and applied in patients with septic shock, showing an improvements in hemodynamics with decreased vasopressor requirements and improved survival in patients admitted after a cardiac arrest.

The main benefit described with high volume hemofiltration is a hemodynamic improvement (e.g reduction in catecholamines' requirement). This improvement seems to be due to the removal of a badly defined network of middle molecular weight peptides. To remove efficiently these middle molecular peptides, a high filtration rate is needed. However, with high filtration rates, there is also a high clearance for smaller molecules, including antibiotics, electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements and amino acids.

The cascade hemofiltration system has been designed for a more efficient removal of middle molecular weight peptides with a limited solute consumption.

The goal of this study is the evaluation of the hemodynamic improvement using cascade hemofiltration in patients treated for septic shock.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Cascade
  • Other: Standard treatment
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of Hemodynamic Effects of Cascade Hemofiltration in Septic Shock
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard treatment

Other: Standard treatment
Standard therapy

Experimental: Cascade

Device: Cascade
Cascade treatment over 48h

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. the primary outcome will be the number of days without catecholamines at the 28th day of randomization [28th day]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. rate of decrease of catecholamines during the first 72h, days without mechanical ventilation at D90, days without RRT for acute renal failure at D90, days without ICU requirement at D90, status at D90. [72h, D90]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient with a septic shock diagnosed by the medical staff team.

  • Patient mechanically ventilated and treated by high doses of catecholamines after adequate fluid administration (≥ 1.0 mg/h of norepinephrine or epinephrine) for ≥ 120 minutes and < 24h.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Age (years) < 18 or > 85.

  • Weight >120 kg

  • Thrombocytopenia 50< G/l or Neutrophils <0.5 Giga/l

  • Contra indication to heparin anticoagulation.

  • Patient requiring catecholamines (epinephrine ≥ 1 mg/h or norepinephrine ≥ 1 mg/h) for

24h.

  • Patient admitted to the ICU ≥ 7 days before the inclusion criteria.

  • Comorbid conditions with an expected survival < 6 months

  • Inclusion (<28 days) in another study interfering with the goals of the current investigation.

  • Pregnancy

  • Immune compromised patients (e.g. being treated for cancer, treated by immunosuppressors or steroids, AIDS).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU hospital Clermont-Ferrand France 63003
2 Hopital Le Bocage Dijon France 21079
3 Centre Hospitalier Marc JACQUET Melun France 77 000
4 Hopital Tenon Paris France 75020
5 Hopital Delafontaine Saint Denis France 93205

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Baxter Healthcare Corporation
  • Gambro Lundia AB

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Monchi Mehran, Dr, Unaffiliate

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00922870
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1450
First Posted:
Jun 17, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Apr 5, 2017
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2017
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 5, 2017