Bovine Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase for the Treatment of Patients With Sepsis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Eligible patients will receive either AP or matching placebo in a double blind, randomized design and following a 2:1 ratio. All medication will be given in addition to standard care for sepsis patients. Patients will be followed for 28 days after the start of study medication administration. A blinded safety review of the study results will take place after the inclusion of 12 patients in the study.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Both bolus and continuous infusions were found to effectively reduce the LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFα in piglets. When AP was administered as a bolus (160 U/kg), the reduction of TNFα after administration of 10 μg/kg LPS in piglets was found to be in the order of 32%. When 100 U/kg of CIAP was administered as an infusion over 50 minutes, reaching steady state levels of 400 U/L, the reduction in TNFα after LPS challenge was substantially (70%), as compared to TNFα levels after LPS only. A series of these studies demonstrated that dosages of 100-120 U/kg administered over 50 minutes could effectively reduce LPS toxicity at steady state levels around 400 U/L, about a 10 fold of the normal alkaline phosphatase plasma levels (40 U/L in piglets). Furthermore, it is estimated that the above-mentioned dosages can effectively detoxify 10 μg LPS/kg in piglets, which represents an LPS-equivalent derived from about 1010 colony forming units (cfu) of E.coli. These amounts of circulating bacteria are not easily established in a sepsis patient. It is estimated (personal communication, Prof. S. van Deventer, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam) that the bacterial load in these patients is less than 107 bacteria total, which is equivalent to approx. 2x105 cfu/kg.
In summary, in piglets 160 U/kg AP was able to detoxify an amount of LPS equivalent to 1010 cfu E. Coli/kg, which is approximately 50,000 times the expected amount of bacteria in sepsis patients. We therefore expect that the dosage used in human (200 U/kg) administered over 24 hours is able to detoxify the amount of LPS present in sepsis patients. This dosage will result in 5-times normal plasma level of alkaline phosphatase which was well tolerated during the previous clinical trials. Since the effect of antibiotic treatment is expected to occur within hours of administration we decided to establish this steady state level of AP as fast as possible, which explains the initial bolus-like administration by short infusion, followed by a prolonged steady state infusion.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1 BIAP |
Drug: Alkaline Phosphatase
Intravenous over a period of 24 hours
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Placebo, saline |
Drug: Placebo
Saline over a period of 24h
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Presence of (Serious) Adverse Events ((S)AEs), vital signs (body temperature, heart rate), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, electrocardiogram variables, biochemical, haematological, and coagulation variables, and frequency and type of anti-AP. [28 days]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Variables for evaluation of the effect on inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), plasma lactate, cytokines (TNFalfa, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10), white cell count, and procalcitonin (PCT) were assessed.differential [28]
- Evaluation effect: APACHE-II score, overall mortality at 28 days, length of stay at ICU, number of days requiring mechanical ventilation, length of stay in hospital, SOFA score, and number of dysfunctional organs were assessed. [28]
- Clinical assessment after 90 days [90 days]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients between 18 and 80 years (inclusive);
-
proven or suspected infection;
-
meeting 2 of 4 of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria;
-
septic shock or one or more acute organ failures in the preceding 12 hours;
-
written informed consent obtained.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Pregnant or lactating women;
-
known HIV seropositive patients;
-
patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy or chronically using high doses of glucocorticosteroids (defined as > 1 mg/kg/day) equivalent to prednisone 1 mg/kg/day;
-
patients expected to have rapidly fatal disease within 24 h;
-
known confirmed gram-positive sepsis;
-
known confirmed fungal sepsis;
-
chronic renal failure requiring haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis;
-
acute pancreatitis with no established source of infection;
-
patients not expected to survive for 28 days due to other medical conditions such as end-stage neoplasm or other diseases;
-
participation in another investigational study within 90 days prior to start of the study which might interfere with this study;
-
previous administration of AP;
-
known allergy for cow milk.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University Hospital Vrije Universiteit Brussel | Brussel | Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest | Belgium | B-1090 |
2 | Hospital Network Antwerpen - Middelheim | Antwerpen | Belgium | B-2020 | |
3 | University Hospital Antwerpen | Antwerpen | Belgium | B-2650 | |
4 | Medical Centre Leeuwarden | Leeuwarden | Friesland | Netherlands | 8934 AD |
5 | University Medical Centre St. Radboud | Nijmegen | Gelderland | Netherlands | 6500 HB |
6 | St. Elisabeth Hospital | Tilburg | N-Brabant | Netherlands | 5022 GC |
7 | Isala Clinics | Zwolle | Overijssel | Netherlands | 8011 JW |
8 | Erasmus Medical Centre | Rotterdam | Z-Holland | Netherlands | 3015 GD |
9 | University Medical Centre Groningen | Groningen | Netherlands | 9700 RB | |
10 | University Medical Centre Utrecht | Utrecht | Netherlands | 3508 GA |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- AM-Pharma
Investigators
- Study Chair: Bart Wuurman, M.Sc.,
- Principal Investigator: Hans JG van der Hoeven, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Angus DC, Birmingham MC, Balk RA, Scannon PJ, Collins D, Kruse JA, Graham DR, Dedhia HV, Homann S, MacIntyre N. E5 murine monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody in gram-negative sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. E5 Study Investigators. JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1723-30.
- Annane D, Sébille V, Troché G, Raphaël JC, Gajdos P, Bellissant E. A 3-level prognostic classification in septic shock based on cortisol levels and cortisol response to corticotropin. JAMA. 2000 Feb 23;283(8):1038-45.
- Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55. Review.
- Bone RC, Grodzin CJ, Balk RA. Sepsis: a new hypothesis for pathogenesis of the disease process. Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):235-43. Review.
- From the Centers for Disease Control. Increase in National Hospital Discharge Survey rates for septicemia--United States, 1979-1987. JAMA. 1990 Feb 16;263(7):937-8.
- Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1546-54.
- Parrillo JE, Parker MM, Natanson C, Suffredini AF, Danner RL, Cunnion RE, Ognibene FP. Septic shock in humans. Advances in the understanding of pathogenesis, cardiovascular dysfunction, and therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Aug 1;113(3):227-42. Review.
- Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, Hwang T, Davis CS, Wenzel RP. The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective study. JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):117-23.
- AP SEP 02-01
- EudraCT No. 2005-005257-21