Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness by Elevation of PEEP in Patients With Septic Shock

Sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01827007
Collaborator
(none)
20
1
1
61
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether fluid responsiveness of the critically ill patient can be assessed by analysing the PEEP-induced hemodynamic effects to systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, aortic blood flow, aortic time-velocity integral and left ventricular end diastolic area measured with transesophageal echocardiography (PEEP-test). The chances are compared to increase of CI after volume expansion (gold standard). In clinical practise, it would be especially relevant if PEEP-induced changes in arterial pressure variations could be used in evaluation of volume status and fluid responsiveness. However, as ECHO-derived variables are used in greater extent to guide the treatment with inappropriate evidence, the simultaneous registration of ECHO-derived hemodynamic measurements is essential in the study design.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Volume expansion with gelofusine
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness by Elevation of PEEP in Patients With Septic Shock
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Study arm, elevation of PEEP

Other: Volume expansion with gelofusine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Hemodynamic changes indicating fluid responsiveness assessed during elevation of PEEP. Change in mean arterial pressure or aortic velocity time integral. [Measurement of hemodynamic variables at timepoints 0, 10,20, 60 minutes]

    Measurement of hemodynamic variables using a pulmonary catheter and transesophageal echocardiography at baseline PEEP 10, during elevation of PEEP and after volume challenge at PEEP 10 cmH2O

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pulmonary function and oxygenation [0,10,20,60 minutes, at PEEP 10, 20,10 cmH2O and after fluid expansion PEEP10 cmH2O]

Other Outcome Measures

  1. blood gas sample, for assessment of pH, base excess and blood lactate [0, 60 min]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No

Inclusion Criteria:• Written informed consent by patient or relative

  • Time in ICU < 48 hours

  • Septic shock

  • Pulmonary artery catheter and radial arterial catheter

  • Age 18 - 75 years

  • Sinus rhythm

  • Need for norepinephrine over 0.1 ug/kg/min but otherwise hemodynamically stable i.e no need to change the dose over the last 15min period before the study

  • Mechanical ventilation with sedation

  • Pwcp <18 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Contraindication to elevation of PEEP ( elevated intracranial pressure, pulmonary hypertension or other contraindication )

  • Contraindication to fluid challenge

  • Contraindication to TEE

  • Previous heart failure, heart valve stenosis of insufficiency

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Intensive Care Unit 20, Meilahti Hospital Helsinki HUS Finland 00029

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Helsinki University Central Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erika Wilkman, M.D, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Erika Wilkman, M.D, Helsinki University Central Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01827007
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HUS469/E6/05
First Posted:
Apr 9, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Apr 9, 2013
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2013
Keywords provided by Erika Wilkman, M.D, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 9, 2013