Development and Testing of an Electronic Behavioral Health Record Specific to the Wraparound Care Coordination Process

Sponsor
University of Washington (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02421874
Collaborator
(none)
160
1
2
18.1
8.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this Phase II Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) project is to complete development and evaluate usability and effectiveness of the Wraparound Team Monitoring System (Wrap-TMS), a web-based, electronic behavioral health information system (EBHIS) for the most widely implemented care coordination model in children's behavioral health, the wraparound process. Though wraparound is now considered "evidence-based," implementation in the real world often fails to conform to standards of fidelity and/or use objective data to guide management, supervision, and clinical decision making. Availability of such a system will support efficiency, implementation quality and fidelity, and outcomes for youths enrolled in wraparound. Wrap-TMS features functionality for data entry, management, and basic reporting for the full array of data and information elements needed to manage an integrated care coordination initiative for youths with serious emotional and behavioral disorder (SEBD). In light of our success in Phase I, subsequent partnerships with federal agencies, and inquiries of interest from several states and over 20 provider and managed care organizations, in this Phase II STTR the investigators will complete development of Wrap-TMS, followed by a randomized controlled effectiveness study comparing n=25 wraparound facilitators who use Wrap-TMS serving n=100 families to 25 non-user facilitators serving 100 families on practitioner, implementation, and youth/family outcomes. The evaluation will test two primary hypotheses:

  1. Compared to facilitators in the control group, wraparound facilitators trained to use Wrap-TMS will demonstrate (a) greater use of data and feedback in service delivery; (b) greater fidelity to the wraparound process; (c) higher self-reported teamwork, working alliance, and satisfaction with the intervention; and (d) more positive attitudes toward standardized assessment.

  2. Compared to the control group, parents of youths receiving services from facilitators trained to use TMS will report (a) greater goal clarity, (b) more data collection and use (c) greater satisfaction with services and progress, (d) better fidelity to wraparound, (e) more effective team functioning, (f) greater treatment alliance, and (f) better youth outcomes including greater progress and improved symptoms and functioning.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Wraparound Team Monitoring System electronic health record
  • Behavioral: Education about fidelity maintenance and monitoring
Phase 1/Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
160 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Development, Usability Testing, and Effectiveness Evaluation of Wraparound Team Monitoring System
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2015
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2016
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Use of electronic health record / outcomes monitoring

Use of electronic health record / outcomes monitoring via a specified electronic behavioral health information system

Behavioral: Wraparound Team Monitoring System electronic health record
Wraparound Team Monitoring System (Wrap-TMS) is a web-based, electronic behavioral health information system (EBHIS) for the most widely implemented care coordination model in children's behavioral health, the wraparound process

Active Comparator: education about outcomes monitoring

Care coordination as usual with education about fidelity and outcomes monitoring but no use of EBHIS

Behavioral: Education about fidelity maintenance and monitoring
As an active comparator, we will educate practitioners randomized to the control condition about the importance of maintaining fidelity and monitoring fidelity and progress via a 3 hour training.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. more effective teamwork (Team Climate Inventory (TCI) [6 months]

    Team Climate Inventory (TCI). The TCI is a 38-item survey that evaluates five relevant aspects of health care teamwork (Shared Vision, Participation safety, Support for Innovation, Task orientation, Interaction frequency) using a 5 point Likert scale. Assessed at 4 mos. post enrollment

  2. treatment alliance (Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) [6 months]

    Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) is a widely used rating scale designed to measure the working alliance between counselors and clients. Assessed at 4 mos. post enrollment

  3. improved youth functioning (Top Problem Assessment (TPA) [6 months]

    Top Problem Assessment (TPA) is a consumer-focused index the severity of the top three problems nominated by the parent, on a scale of 0-10. Assessed at BL, 1, 2, 3, 4 mos.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. parent and provider satisfaction (Parent and Child Satisfaction Scales) [3 months]

    Parent and Child Satisfaction Scales reliably measure five dimensions of satisfaction, each with 1 Likert scale item, including: (1) access and convenience, (2) child's treatment process and relationship with providers, (3) parent and family services, satisfaction with progress, and (5) global satisfaction. Assessed at 4 mos post enrollment

  2. attitudes toward standardized assessment (Attitudes toward Standardized Assessment Scale (ASA)105) [3 months]

    Attitudes toward Standardized Assessment Scale (ASA)105. A 22-item measure of clinician perceptions and attitudes about using standardized assessments in their clinical practice. Items are scored on a 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) scale and yield 3 subscales with adequate or better reliabilities: Benefit over Clinical Judgment, Psychometric Quality, and Practicality. Administered to practitioners at baseline and 4 mos.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Parent or legal guardian of a youth aged 6-17 with SEBD (serious emotional and behavioral disorder): at least one MH (mental health) diagnosis that results in long-term (>6 mos) impairment in home, school and/or community functioning).
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Non English speaking parents

  • Foster parents

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Washington Seattle Washington United States 98102

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Washington

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric J Bruns, PhD, University of Washington

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Eric Bruns, Associate Professor, Psychiatry, University of Washington
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02421874
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2R42MH095516
First Posted:
Apr 21, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Oct 26, 2016
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Keywords provided by Eric Bruns, Associate Professor, Psychiatry, University of Washington
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 26, 2016