PRP vs PRP+IVC for Severe nPDR

Sponsor
Ruijin Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03863535
Collaborator
Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Other)
40
1
2
32.4
1.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The randomized clinical trial aims to compare the therapeutic effects between panretinal photocoagulation(PRP) and PRP combined with intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in severe nPDR with/without diabetic macular edema patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

This was a prospective, randomized, two-armed study to assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal conbercept injection plus PRP versus PRP in the treatment of nPDR patients with/without diabetic macular edema for a period of 1 year. This was an investigator-initiated study performed by department of ophthalmology, Ruijin hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP Combined With Intravitreous Conbercept (IVC) for Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (nPDR): A Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 18, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intravitreal conbercept+Panretinal coagulation

Drug: Conbercept
Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive IVC+PRP or PRP monotherapy. Patients in IVC+PRP group with diabetic macular edema (DME) received 3 monthly IVC injections along with standard PRP within 1 week after the first injection. Those without DME received 1 lVC injection and standard PRP within 1 week after the injection . Re-treatments in both groups were at the investigators'discretion.

Procedure: Panretinal coagulation
The PRP monotherapy group received standard PRP between day 1 and month 2; thereafter, re-treatments in both groups were at the investigators'discretion.

Active Comparator: Panretinal coagulation

Procedure: Panretinal coagulation
The PRP monotherapy group received standard PRP between day 1 and month 2; thereafter, re-treatments in both groups were at the investigators'discretion.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [from baseline to month 12]

    To assess the effects of two therapies on visual acuity

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in central subfield thickness [from baseline to month 12]

    optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the assessment of central macular thickness

  2. Fundus fluorescein angiography [from baseline to month 12]

    fluorescein angiography to measure area of fluorescein leakage (FLA)

  3. Foveal avascular zone [from baseline to month 12]

    Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for measurement of FAZ

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
Type II diabetic patients, 18 years and older, were included if the participants had:
  1. severe non-PDR in either eyes with/without diabetic macular edema;

  2. ETDRS letters-measured best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranging from 20/40 to 20/320 Snellen equivalent;

  3. no previous treatment (of any type) in either eye.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. history of prior laser treatment or vitrectomy in the study eye;

  2. history of thromboembolic event - including myocardial infarction or cerebral vascular accident;

  3. major surgery within the prior 6 months or planned within the next 28 days;

  4. history of glaucoma or ocular hypertension;

  5. loss of vision as a result of other causes;

  6. history of systemic corticosteroid therapy within the last 3 months;

  7. severe systemic disease other than diabetes mellitus;

  8. known coagulation abnormalities or current use of anticoagulative medication other than aspirin

  9. any condition that could affect followup or documentation (including preretinal or vitreous hemorrhage).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Shanghai China 20025

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Ruijin Hospital
  • Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission

Investigators

  • Study Director: Xi Shen, MD, Ruijin Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Qiong Zhang, MD, Ruijin Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Xi Shen, Department director of Ophthamology, Ruijin Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03863535
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Ruijin Hospital
First Posted:
Mar 5, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Mar 5, 2019
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2019
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Xi Shen, Department director of Ophthamology, Ruijin Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 5, 2019