PRP vs PRP+IVC for Severe nPDR
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The randomized clinical trial aims to compare the therapeutic effects between panretinal photocoagulation(PRP) and PRP combined with intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in severe nPDR with/without diabetic macular edema patients.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This was a prospective, randomized, two-armed study to assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal conbercept injection plus PRP versus PRP in the treatment of nPDR patients with/without diabetic macular edema for a period of 1 year. This was an investigator-initiated study performed by department of ophthalmology, Ruijin hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intravitreal conbercept+Panretinal coagulation
|
Drug: Conbercept
Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive IVC+PRP or PRP monotherapy. Patients in IVC+PRP group with diabetic macular edema (DME) received 3 monthly IVC injections along with standard PRP within 1 week after the first injection. Those without DME received 1 lVC injection and standard PRP within 1 week after the injection . Re-treatments in both groups were at the investigators'discretion.
Procedure: Panretinal coagulation
The PRP monotherapy group received standard PRP between day 1 and month 2; thereafter, re-treatments in both groups were at the investigators'discretion.
|
Active Comparator: Panretinal coagulation
|
Procedure: Panretinal coagulation
The PRP monotherapy group received standard PRP between day 1 and month 2; thereafter, re-treatments in both groups were at the investigators'discretion.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [from baseline to month 12]
To assess the effects of two therapies on visual acuity
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in central subfield thickness [from baseline to month 12]
optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the assessment of central macular thickness
- Fundus fluorescein angiography [from baseline to month 12]
fluorescein angiography to measure area of fluorescein leakage (FLA)
- Foveal avascular zone [from baseline to month 12]
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for measurement of FAZ
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Type II diabetic patients, 18 years and older, were included if the participants had:
-
severe non-PDR in either eyes with/without diabetic macular edema;
-
ETDRS letters-measured best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranging from 20/40 to 20/320 Snellen equivalent;
-
no previous treatment (of any type) in either eye.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
history of prior laser treatment or vitrectomy in the study eye;
-
history of thromboembolic event - including myocardial infarction or cerebral vascular accident;
-
major surgery within the prior 6 months or planned within the next 28 days;
-
history of glaucoma or ocular hypertension;
-
loss of vision as a result of other causes;
-
history of systemic corticosteroid therapy within the last 3 months;
-
severe systemic disease other than diabetes mellitus;
-
known coagulation abnormalities or current use of anticoagulative medication other than aspirin
-
any condition that could affect followup or documentation (including preretinal or vitreous hemorrhage).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ruijin Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai | China | 20025 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ruijin Hospital
- Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission
Investigators
- Study Director: Xi Shen, MD, Ruijin Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Qiong Zhang, MD, Ruijin Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Ruijin Hospital