Comparing Sevoflurane With Propofol Sedation in ESRF Patients

Sponsor
University of Malaya (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04839536
Collaborator
(none)
36
2
12.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

End-stage renal failure (ESRF) cohorts undergo brachiocephalic fistula(BCF) transposition with supraclavicular block. However, this is inadequate because the incision may extend to the axillary region which requires intercostobrachial (T2) dermatome blockage. Sedation is commonly indicated to allay anxiety whilst allowing intraprocedural lignocaine infiltration. It is challenging to administer safe sedation to ESRF patients due to multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, altered pharmacokinetic drug handling. Intraoperative hypotension can be common and evident from the residual effect of antihypertensive and intravascular hypovolemia from regular hemodialysis. Midazolam is metabolized to an active metabolite which can accumulate causes apnea and delayed recovery. TCI propofol needs higher induction doses to achieve hypnosis causes exaggerated hypotension which may jeopardize organ perfusion. The investigators are exploring the potential benefit of sevoflurane sedation which are independent of renal clearance, rapid onset and offset, and ischemic preconditioning property in ESRF cohorts.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Sevoflurane inhalant product
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Regional anesthesia has been shown to be superior to general anesthesia in end-stage renal disease (ESRF) patients undergoing brachiocephalic transposition by ensuring graft patency, reducing pharmacokinetic (pK) and pharmacodynamic (pD) unpredictability, and minimize hemodynamic instability. However, a supraclavicular nerve block is inadequate in BCF transposition where surgical incision may extend to the axillary region which requires intercostobrachial nerve (T2) dermatome to be blocked. Intraprocedural lignocaine infiltration or pectoralis minor (PEC 2) block may be required to anaesthetize this region. Hence, sedation is commonly indicated to allay anxiety and to blunt sympathetic stress response to surgery.

ESRF patient is a challenging cohort to administer safe sedation due to multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, altered pK handling of drug with a high proportion of total body water, the altered volume of distribution, protein binding, drug metabolism and excretion[3]. Commonly used intravenous midazolam causes delayed recovery and apnoea due to loss of renal ability to clear active metabolite α1-hydroxymidazolam. Target controlled infusion (TCI) propofol needs a higher induction dose to achieve clinical end-point of hypnosis in ESRF patient and causes hemodynamic disturbances.

Dialysis dependent ESRF patients are commonly hypertensive and adapted to a higher baseline blood pressure. Intraoperative hypotension is exaggerated from residual effect of antihypertensive, relative intravascular hypovolemia from pre-op haemodialysis and pre-operative fasting with no replacement fluid. Blood pressure determine perfusion, and existing evidence suggests intraoperative hypotension is associated with stroke, myocardial injury and delirium. Major hypertension guidelines have recommended target blood pressure level of 140/90 mm Hg for patients with renal disease.

Volatile sedation with sevoflurane in intensive care has been widely appraised for significant shorten and superior awakening time and reduced incidence of delirium compared with conventional midazolam/ propofol intravenous sedation. Sevoflurane has rapid onset of action with no significant concern of tolerance and tachyphylaxis. Drug clearance is via pulmonary exhalation which is independent of hepatic and renal function. Volatile agent is a mild analgesia with opioid sparing effect via N methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade, thus provide a more stable sedation profile.ESRF patients are prone to develop ischemic heart disease due to calcification of intima. Sevoflurane also possess ischemic preconditioning and end organ cytoprotective properties along with anti-inflammatory mechanism.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
36 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Comparative Study of Sevoflurane Sedation With TCI Propofol Sedation in Dialysis Dependent End Stage Renal Failure Patients for Transposition of Brachiocephalic Fistula Repair
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Target controlled infusion (TCI) propofol

For TCI propofol group, all patients will receive nasal CPAP mask and nasal breathing with oxygen of 3 litre/min. We will utilize the Schneider model to target effect-site (Cet) starting from 0.5 mcg/ml and with a gradual 0.5mcg/ml increment every 30s until OAAS score of 3 is achieved. For any patients with OAAS score < 3, Cet will be decreased by a decremental 0.5 mcg/ml. The deepest level of sedation will be recorded.

Drug: Sevoflurane inhalant product
Sevoflurane will be delivered in an incremental dose to throughout procedure to achieve clinical sedation endpoint OAAS 3.
Other Names:
  • Ultane, 74412392
  • Experimental: Sevoflurane sedation

    Patients randomised to this arm will be given time to familiarise with the nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask and nasal breathing with oxygen 3 litre/min via a Bain anaesthetic circuit before the introduction of sevoflurane. Once the patient starts to adapt to nasal CPAP mask, sevoflurane will be delivered, starting with a concentration of 0.2% and increase stepwise by 0.2% every 30s until sedation score of OAAS of 3 is achieved. Anaesthetist in charge will assess and maintain sedation endpoint to OAAS 3. If patient is over sedated, sevoflurane concentration will be reduced by 0.2% until OAAS 3. The deepest level of sedation will be recorded.

    Drug: Sevoflurane inhalant product
    Sevoflurane will be delivered in an incremental dose to throughout procedure to achieve clinical sedation endpoint OAAS 3.
    Other Names:
  • Ultane, 74412392
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in mean arterial pressure from baseline following sedation [At baseline, pre-, and immediately after intervention]

      Hemodynamic instability is defined as event below: Hypotension- Drop in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline by more than 20% Hypotension - Drop in systolic blood pressure (sBP < 140 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (dBP < 90 mmHg)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of hemodynamic interventions required during sedation [At baseline, pre-, and immediately after intervention]

      administration of vasoactive drugs to maintain hemodynamic within target (sBP> 140 mmHg, dBP > 80 mmHg, MAP within 20% baseline)

    2. Duration of hemodynamic instability [At baseline, pre-, and immediately after intervention and surgery]

      Time course of drop in mean arterial pressure more than 20%

    3. Onset time and recovery time [At baseline, pre-, and immediately after intervention and surgery]

      Onset time: time from starting sedation to Observer Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation (OAAS) score 3 (maintain at 3 for a consecutive 15 mins) Recovery time: Time from cessation of sedation to return to OAAS score 5

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patient with end stage renal failure, dialysis dependent undergoing transposition of brachiocephalic fistula repair

    • American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification System (ASA) II or III

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patient refusal

    • History or family history of malignant hyperthermia

    • Known allergy to propofol or local anaesthetic agent

    • Patients who have taken neuroleptics, benzodiazepine over 2 weeks within 1 month

    • Chronic use of alcohols/ opioid

    • Active lungs disease (eg. acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)

    • Active and significant cardiac disease (eg. decompensated congestive cardiac failure, recent myocardial infarction)

    • End-stage heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction < 30%

    • Recent (< 3 months) cerebrovascular accident

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Malaya

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Chao Chia Cheong, MMed Master, University Malaya

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    University of Malaya
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04839536
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • MREC: 2021116-9722
    First Posted:
    Apr 9, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 9, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by University of Malaya
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 9, 2021