Sexual Function and Wellbeing in Females With Rectal Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and pelvic surgery is recommended to many patients with rectal cancer. For women there are theoretical reasons to believe that the treatment may affect hormone levels, sexual function and wellbeing. To address these questions a longitudinal observational study was initiated where androgen levels and sexual function were assessed before treatment (baseline) and during a follow-up period of two years.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Women with rectal cancer stage I to III planned for abdominal surgery was included in the study. Women treated with preoperative RT were assigned to the exposed group and women treated with surgery alone were assigned to the unexposed group.
142 participants were enrolled at five outpatient rectal cancer centres in Sweden between 2008 and 2013. Patient data, fasting venous blood samples and questionnaires regarding sexual function and well-being were collected at a baseline visit before start of oncologic treatment, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery (only questionnaires). Women treated with preoperative RT for rectal cancer had an additional venous blood sample taken the day before surgery.
Changes in serum levels of testosterone and sexual function during follow-up was assessed and compared between exposed and unexposed participants.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Preoperative radiotherapy Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. |
Radiation: Preoperative radiotherapy
Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) was administered as either short course (5Gy x5) or long-course (2Gy x25 or 1.8 Gy x25 with or without 3 fractions of boost to the primary tumor and radiologically malignant lymph nodes) treatment with or without concomitant or sequential chemotherapy. Oncological treatment was decided at a multidisciplinary team conference.
|
No preoperative radiotherapy Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT). |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery. [Baseline, the week before surgery and 1 year after surgery.]
Fasting venous blood samples were collected at baseline visit (prior to oncological treatment) and 1 year follow-up. Participants treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) had an additional blood sample taken the day before surgery. Serum testosterone levels (T) were measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using the LC-MS/MS Quattro Premier Xevo TQ MS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The total coefficients of variation (CVtot) were 7% at 2.8 nmol/L and 6% at 15 nmol/L.
- Change in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up. [Baseline, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery.]
Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI questionnaire is a 19-item multiple-choice, self-assessment tool validated for use in the general population as well as for patients with cancer. It covers six domains of sexual function in women; desire (2 items), arousal (4 items), lubrication (4 items), orgasm (3 items), satisfaction (3 items) and pain (3 items). Items scores between 0 or 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score can be calculated when all items are completed. Minimal total score is 4 points and maximal score is 95 points, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score of less than 26.55 points was used to define overall sexual dysfunction.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Females diagnosed with rectal cancer stadium I-III, planned surgery with or without preoperative radiotherapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Rectal cancer stadium IV
-
Previous radiotherapy to the pelvic region
-
Inability to provide informed consent.
-
Life expectancy less than 2 years.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linköping University Hospital | Linköping | Sweden | ||
2 | Norrköping Hospital | Norrköping | Sweden | ||
3 | Ersta Hospital | Stockholm | Sweden | ||
4 | Karolinska University Hospital | Stockholm | Sweden | ||
5 | Örebro University Hospital | Örebro | Sweden |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutet
- Swedish Cancer Society
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anna Martling, Karolinska Institutet
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- 2008/247-31/3
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were recruited from five Swedish outpatient rectal cancer centres in Sweden (Karolinska University Hospital, Ersta Hospital, Örebro University Hospital, Linköping University Hospital and Norrköping Hospital) between June 2008 and August 2013. Of 404 women with rectal cancer assessed for eligibility, 142 were included in the study. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Preoperative Radiotherapy | No Preoperative Radiotherapy |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. | Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT). |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 110 | 32 |
COMPLETED | 85 | 27 |
NOT COMPLETED | 25 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Preoperative Radiotherapy | No Preoperative Radiotherapy | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. | Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT). | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 110 | 32 | 142 |
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [years] |
62
|
69
|
65.5
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
110
100%
|
32
100%
|
142
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
BMI (kg/m2) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [kg/m2] |
24.2
|
24.4
|
24.3
|
ASA score (Count of Participants) | |||
I |
35
31.8%
|
7
21.9%
|
42
29.6%
|
II |
58
52.7%
|
13
40.6%
|
71
50%
|
III |
16
14.5%
|
9
28.1%
|
25
17.6%
|
Missing |
1
0.9%
|
3
9.4%
|
4
2.8%
|
Tumour distance from anal verge (Count of Participants) | |||
0-4 cm |
45
40.9%
|
4
12.5%
|
49
34.5%
|
5-10 cm |
40
36.4%
|
14
43.8%
|
54
38%
|
11-15 cm |
23
20.9%
|
12
37.5%
|
35
24.6%
|
Missing |
2
1.8%
|
2
6.3%
|
4
2.8%
|
Type of preoperative RT (Count of Participants) | |||
Short course (5Gy x5) |
73
66.4%
|
0
0%
|
73
51.4%
|
Long course (2 Gy x25 or 1.8 x28) |
37
33.6%
|
0
0%
|
37
26.1%
|
No RT |
0
0%
|
32
100%
|
32
22.5%
|
Type of Surgery (Count of Participants) | |||
Anterior resection |
54
49.1%
|
20
62.5%
|
74
52.1%
|
Abdominal excision |
53
48.2%
|
8
25%
|
61
43%
|
No abdominal surgery |
2
1.8%
|
2
6.3%
|
4
2.8%
|
Missing |
1
0.9%
|
2
6.3%
|
3
2.1%
|
Resection of gynaecological organs (Count of Participants) | |||
Hysterectomy |
13
11.8%
|
5
15.6%
|
18
12.7%
|
Unilateral/bilateral oophorectomy |
16
14.5%
|
4
12.5%
|
20
14.1%
|
Partial vaginal resection |
9
8.2%
|
0
0%
|
9
6.3%
|
No resection |
71
64.5%
|
21
65.6%
|
92
64.8%
|
Missing |
1
0.9%
|
2
6.3%
|
3
2.1%
|
Pathological tumour stage (Count of Participants) | |||
0 |
10
9.1%
|
1
3.1%
|
11
7.7%
|
I |
24
21.8%
|
8
25%
|
32
22.5%
|
II |
29
26.4%
|
6
18.8%
|
35
24.6%
|
III |
39
35.5%
|
13
40.6%
|
52
36.6%
|
IV |
4
3.6%
|
1
3.1%
|
5
3.5%
|
Missing |
4
3.6%
|
3
9.4%
|
7
4.9%
|
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Count of Participants) | |||
Yes |
35
31.8%
|
1
3.1%
|
36
25.4%
|
No |
74
67.3%
|
29
90.6%
|
103
72.5%
|
Missing |
1
0.9%
|
2
6.3%
|
3
2.1%
|
Adjuvant chemotherapy (Count of Participants) | |||
Yes |
36
32.7%
|
9
28.1%
|
45
31.7%
|
No |
73
66.4%
|
21
65.6%
|
94
66.2%
|
Missing |
1
0.9%
|
2
6.3%
|
3
2.1%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery. |
---|---|
Description | Fasting venous blood samples were collected at baseline visit (prior to oncological treatment) and 1 year follow-up. Participants treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) had an additional blood sample taken the day before surgery. Serum testosterone levels (T) were measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using the LC-MS/MS Quattro Premier Xevo TQ MS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The total coefficients of variation (CVtot) were 7% at 2.8 nmol/L and 6% at 15 nmol/L. |
Time Frame | Baseline, the week before surgery and 1 year after surgery. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
17 of the included 142 participants were excluded due to history of oophorectomy, resulting in 125 participants analysed. Participants in the group "No preoperative radiotherapy" had no blood samples taken at the time point "After RT/before surgery". |
Arm/Group Title | Preoperative Radiotherapy | No Preoperative Radiotherapy |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. | Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT). |
Measure Participants | 98 | 27 |
Baseline |
0.6
|
0.6
|
After RT/before surgery |
0.6
|
|
1 year after surgery |
0.5
|
0.6
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Preoperative Radiotherapy |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change in serum testosterone levels between baseline and 1 year was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.004 |
Comments | The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05. | |
Method | Regression, Linear | |
Comments | Model adjusted for menopausal status. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean change |
Estimated Value | -0.138 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.232 to -0.044 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | No Preoperative Radiotherapy |
---|---|---|
Comments | The change in serum testosterone levels between baseline and 1 year was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.805 |
Comments | The threshold for statistical significance was p=0.05. | |
Method | Regression, Linear | |
Comments | Model adjusted for menopausal status. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean change |
Estimated Value | -0.011 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.097 to 0.075 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up. |
---|---|
Description | Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI questionnaire is a 19-item multiple-choice, self-assessment tool validated for use in the general population as well as for patients with cancer. It covers six domains of sexual function in women; desire (2 items), arousal (4 items), lubrication (4 items), orgasm (3 items), satisfaction (3 items) and pain (3 items). Items scores between 0 or 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score can be calculated when all items are completed. Minimal total score is 4 points and maximal score is 95 points, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score of less than 26.55 points was used to define overall sexual dysfunction. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Of the 142 participants included in the study, 3 were excluded due to not answering FSFI questionnaires at any timepoint. Total FSFI scores were only calculated for available questionnaires without missing items. |
Arm/Group Title | Preoperative Radiotherapy | No Preoperative Radiotherapy |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. | Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT). |
Measure Participants | 109 | 30 |
Baseline |
18.5
|
6.7
|
1 year after surgery |
11.1
|
5.8
|
2 years after surgery |
10.8
|
6.5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Preoperative Radiotherapy, No Preoperative Radiotherapy |
---|---|---|
Comments | The association between mean change in total FSFI score and preoperative RT was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE), using "no preoperative radiotherapy" as the reference group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.013 |
Comments | The threshold for statistical significance was p=0.05. | |
Method | Regression, Linear | |
Comments | Model adjusted for Age, Psychological General Well-being total score and relationship with partner. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean change in FSFI scores |
Estimated Value | -9.33 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -16.66 to -1.99 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Adverse Events were not monitored. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Preoperative RT | No Preoperative RT | ||
Arm/Group Description | Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. | Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT). | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Preoperative RT | No Preoperative RT | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 4/110 (3.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Preoperative RT | No Preoperative RT | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Preoperative RT | No Preoperative RT | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Professor Anna Martling |
---|---|
Organization | Karolinska Institutet |
Phone | +46851770000 |
anna.martling@ki.se |
- 2008/247-31/3