Sexual Function and Wellbeing in Females With Rectal Cancer

Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01216189
Collaborator
Swedish Cancer Society (Other)
142
5
90
28.4
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and pelvic surgery is recommended to many patients with rectal cancer. For women there are theoretical reasons to believe that the treatment may affect hormone levels, sexual function and wellbeing. To address these questions a longitudinal observational study was initiated where androgen levels and sexual function were assessed before treatment (baseline) and during a follow-up period of two years.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Preoperative radiotherapy

Detailed Description

Women with rectal cancer stage I to III planned for abdominal surgery was included in the study. Women treated with preoperative RT were assigned to the exposed group and women treated with surgery alone were assigned to the unexposed group.

142 participants were enrolled at five outpatient rectal cancer centres in Sweden between 2008 and 2013. Patient data, fasting venous blood samples and questionnaires regarding sexual function and well-being were collected at a baseline visit before start of oncologic treatment, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery (only questionnaires). Women treated with preoperative RT for rectal cancer had an additional venous blood sample taken the day before surgery.

Changes in serum levels of testosterone and sexual function during follow-up was assessed and compared between exposed and unexposed participants.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
142 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Sexual Function and Wellbeing in Females Diagnosed With Rectal Cancer
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Preoperative radiotherapy

Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery.

Radiation: Preoperative radiotherapy
Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) was administered as either short course (5Gy x5) or long-course (2Gy x25 or 1.8 Gy x25 with or without 3 fractions of boost to the primary tumor and radiologically malignant lymph nodes) treatment with or without concomitant or sequential chemotherapy. Oncological treatment was decided at a multidisciplinary team conference.

No preoperative radiotherapy

Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery. [Baseline, the week before surgery and 1 year after surgery.]

    Fasting venous blood samples were collected at baseline visit (prior to oncological treatment) and 1 year follow-up. Participants treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) had an additional blood sample taken the day before surgery. Serum testosterone levels (T) were measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using the LC-MS/MS Quattro Premier Xevo TQ MS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The total coefficients of variation (CVtot) were 7% at 2.8 nmol/L and 6% at 15 nmol/L.

  2. Change in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up. [Baseline, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery.]

    Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI questionnaire is a 19-item multiple-choice, self-assessment tool validated for use in the general population as well as for patients with cancer. It covers six domains of sexual function in women; desire (2 items), arousal (4 items), lubrication (4 items), orgasm (3 items), satisfaction (3 items) and pain (3 items). Items scores between 0 or 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score can be calculated when all items are completed. Minimal total score is 4 points and maximal score is 95 points, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score of less than 26.55 points was used to define overall sexual dysfunction.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Females diagnosed with rectal cancer stadium I-III, planned surgery with or without preoperative radiotherapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Rectal cancer stadium IV

  • Previous radiotherapy to the pelvic region

  • Inability to provide informed consent.

  • Life expectancy less than 2 years.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Linköping University Hospital Linköping Sweden
2 Norrköping Hospital Norrköping Sweden
3 Ersta Hospital Stockholm Sweden
4 Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
5 Örebro University Hospital Örebro Sweden

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Swedish Cancer Society

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna Martling, Karolinska Institutet

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Anna Martling, Professor, Senior Consultant Surgeon, Karolinska Institutet
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01216189
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2008/247-31/3
First Posted:
Oct 7, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Apr 9, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by Anna Martling, Professor, Senior Consultant Surgeon, Karolinska Institutet
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Participants were recruited from five Swedish outpatient rectal cancer centres in Sweden (Karolinska University Hospital, Ersta Hospital, Örebro University Hospital, Linköping University Hospital and Norrköping Hospital) between June 2008 and August 2013. Of 404 women with rectal cancer assessed for eligibility, 142 were included in the study.
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Preoperative Radiotherapy No Preoperative Radiotherapy
Arm/Group Description Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT).
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 110 32
COMPLETED 85 27
NOT COMPLETED 25 5

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Preoperative Radiotherapy No Preoperative Radiotherapy Total
Arm/Group Description Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT). Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 110 32 142
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ]
Median (Full Range) [years]
62
69
65.5
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
110
100%
32
100%
142
100%
Male
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
BMI (kg/m2) [Median (Full Range) ]
Median (Full Range) [kg/m2]
24.2
24.4
24.3
ASA score (Count of Participants)
I
35
31.8%
7
21.9%
42
29.6%
II
58
52.7%
13
40.6%
71
50%
III
16
14.5%
9
28.1%
25
17.6%
Missing
1
0.9%
3
9.4%
4
2.8%
Tumour distance from anal verge (Count of Participants)
0-4 cm
45
40.9%
4
12.5%
49
34.5%
5-10 cm
40
36.4%
14
43.8%
54
38%
11-15 cm
23
20.9%
12
37.5%
35
24.6%
Missing
2
1.8%
2
6.3%
4
2.8%
Type of preoperative RT (Count of Participants)
Short course (5Gy x5)
73
66.4%
0
0%
73
51.4%
Long course (2 Gy x25 or 1.8 x28)
37
33.6%
0
0%
37
26.1%
No RT
0
0%
32
100%
32
22.5%
Type of Surgery (Count of Participants)
Anterior resection
54
49.1%
20
62.5%
74
52.1%
Abdominal excision
53
48.2%
8
25%
61
43%
No abdominal surgery
2
1.8%
2
6.3%
4
2.8%
Missing
1
0.9%
2
6.3%
3
2.1%
Resection of gynaecological organs (Count of Participants)
Hysterectomy
13
11.8%
5
15.6%
18
12.7%
Unilateral/bilateral oophorectomy
16
14.5%
4
12.5%
20
14.1%
Partial vaginal resection
9
8.2%
0
0%
9
6.3%
No resection
71
64.5%
21
65.6%
92
64.8%
Missing
1
0.9%
2
6.3%
3
2.1%
Pathological tumour stage (Count of Participants)
0
10
9.1%
1
3.1%
11
7.7%
I
24
21.8%
8
25%
32
22.5%
II
29
26.4%
6
18.8%
35
24.6%
III
39
35.5%
13
40.6%
52
36.6%
IV
4
3.6%
1
3.1%
5
3.5%
Missing
4
3.6%
3
9.4%
7
4.9%
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Count of Participants)
Yes
35
31.8%
1
3.1%
36
25.4%
No
74
67.3%
29
90.6%
103
72.5%
Missing
1
0.9%
2
6.3%
3
2.1%
Adjuvant chemotherapy (Count of Participants)
Yes
36
32.7%
9
28.1%
45
31.7%
No
73
66.4%
21
65.6%
94
66.2%
Missing
1
0.9%
2
6.3%
3
2.1%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery.
Description Fasting venous blood samples were collected at baseline visit (prior to oncological treatment) and 1 year follow-up. Participants treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) had an additional blood sample taken the day before surgery. Serum testosterone levels (T) were measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using the LC-MS/MS Quattro Premier Xevo TQ MS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The total coefficients of variation (CVtot) were 7% at 2.8 nmol/L and 6% at 15 nmol/L.
Time Frame Baseline, the week before surgery and 1 year after surgery.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
17 of the included 142 participants were excluded due to history of oophorectomy, resulting in 125 participants analysed. Participants in the group "No preoperative radiotherapy" had no blood samples taken at the time point "After RT/before surgery".
Arm/Group Title Preoperative Radiotherapy No Preoperative Radiotherapy
Arm/Group Description Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT).
Measure Participants 98 27
Baseline
0.6
0.6
After RT/before surgery
0.6
1 year after surgery
0.5
0.6
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Preoperative Radiotherapy
Comments The change in serum testosterone levels between baseline and 1 year was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE).
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.004
Comments The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for menopausal status.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean change
Estimated Value -0.138
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.232 to -0.044
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection No Preoperative Radiotherapy
Comments The change in serum testosterone levels between baseline and 1 year was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE).
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.805
Comments The threshold for statistical significance was p=0.05.
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for menopausal status.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean change
Estimated Value -0.011
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.097 to 0.075
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Primary Outcome
Title Change in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.
Description Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI questionnaire is a 19-item multiple-choice, self-assessment tool validated for use in the general population as well as for patients with cancer. It covers six domains of sexual function in women; desire (2 items), arousal (4 items), lubrication (4 items), orgasm (3 items), satisfaction (3 items) and pain (3 items). Items scores between 0 or 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score can be calculated when all items are completed. Minimal total score is 4 points and maximal score is 95 points, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score of less than 26.55 points was used to define overall sexual dysfunction.
Time Frame Baseline, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Of the 142 participants included in the study, 3 were excluded due to not answering FSFI questionnaires at any timepoint. Total FSFI scores were only calculated for available questionnaires without missing items.
Arm/Group Title Preoperative Radiotherapy No Preoperative Radiotherapy
Arm/Group Description Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT).
Measure Participants 109 30
Baseline
18.5
6.7
1 year after surgery
11.1
5.8
2 years after surgery
10.8
6.5
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Preoperative Radiotherapy, No Preoperative Radiotherapy
Comments The association between mean change in total FSFI score and preoperative RT was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE), using "no preoperative radiotherapy" as the reference group.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.013
Comments The threshold for statistical significance was p=0.05.
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for Age, Psychological General Well-being total score and relationship with partner.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean change in FSFI scores
Estimated Value -9.33
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-16.66 to -1.99
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description Adverse Events were not monitored.
Arm/Group Title Preoperative RT No Preoperative RT
Arm/Group Description Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT).
All Cause Mortality
Preoperative RT No Preoperative RT
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 4/110 (3.6%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Serious Adverse Events
Preoperative RT No Preoperative RT
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/0 (NaN) 0/0 (NaN)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Preoperative RT No Preoperative RT
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/0 (NaN) 0/0 (NaN)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Professor Anna Martling
Organization Karolinska Institutet
Phone +46851770000
Email anna.martling@ki.se
Responsible Party:
Anna Martling, Professor, Senior Consultant Surgeon, Karolinska Institutet
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01216189
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2008/247-31/3
First Posted:
Oct 7, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Apr 9, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021