SGLT-2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Ascites
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to test the efficacy of glyphozines (SGLT-2 inhibitors) in the control of ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis in class A6-B9, according to the Child-Pugh classification, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Researchers will compare patients belonging to the intervention group (A), who will be given SGLT-2 inhibitors according to diabetology indications in addition to standard medical therapy for 6, with patients of the control group (B), who will, instead, continue with the standard medical therapy for 6 months. Standard medical therapy will include dietary sodium restriction, treatment with diuretics (furosemide and spironolactone), hypoglycemic therapy (metformin, insulin, or both) and other supportive care.
The main questions aims of this study are:
-
Compare the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic approach based on the administration of SGLT-2 inhibitors in addition to optimal medical therapy (MRA and loop diuretic) compared to traditional diuretic therapy only, in cirrhotic patients with saline retention and diabetes.
-
Demonstrate better control of the glycemic profile in cirrhotic diabetic patients using SGLT-2 inhibitors.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND The occurrence of ascites and saline retention is the most common complication in patients affected by liver cirrhosis and it is associated with poor prognosis.
It is well-known that in liver cirrhosis the underlying pathogenetic events responsible of ascites are portal hypertension and splanchnic vasodilation. These mechanisms reduce the effective circulating blood volume, triggering counter-regulatory systems such as the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), that leading to renal sodium and water retention.
Therefore, considering pathogenetic knowledge, the cornerstones of ascites treatment are sodium restriction and drugs such as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and loop diuretics, reserving more invasive techniques, like paracentesis with administration of human albumin, for more severe patients with grade 3 ascites unresponsive to diuretics. However, even though diuretics have proven to be among the most efficient drugs in controlling ascites, patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites treated with diuretics develop adverse drug reactions in 20-40% of cases (10).
One of the most common comorbidities of liver cirrhosis is type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), which affects approximately one-third of cirrhotic patients. The connection between liver cirrhosis and DM2 is complex. DM2 can be a secondary effect or, conversely, a casual factor of liver dysfunction.
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are a relatively new class of drugs for the management of type-2 diabetes mellitus. They inhibit the reabsorption of sodium and glucose in the proximal convoluted tubule of the nephron, leading to a significant natriuresis and have proven to be effective and safe drugs for the control of the glycemic profile in patients with liver dysfunction.
In recently published case reports, SGLT-2i have also proven to be safe and effective in controlling the glycemic profile in patients with liver dysfunction. In these patients, in addition to better control the glycemic profile, they led to saline retention improvement and to weight loss, without inducing encephalopathy or acute kidney injury. Other studies have hypothesized that, similarly to the previously demonstrated beneficial effect of glyphozines in patients with acute heart failure, SGLT-2i may also lead to the improvement of complicated liver cirrhosis acting as "neuromodulators", suppressing the RAAS axis and inducing better mobilization of ascites and reduction of saline retention.
Currently, there are no randomized controlled trials supporting these evidences.
In this observational study we intend to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2i in cirrhotic and diabetic patients with saline retention.
AIMS
-
Comparing the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic approach based on the administration of SGLT-2i in addition to optimal medical therapy (MRA and loop diuretic) compared to traditional diuretic therapy only, in cirrhotic patients with saline retention and diabetes.
-
Demonstrating better control of the glycemic profile in cirrhotic diabetic patients using SGLT-2i.
Sample and study design Our study will be a clinical, prospective, observational multicenter study. We will enroll subjects with complicated liver cirrhosis and type II diabetes mellitus consecutively, in two centers: Internal Medicine Unit of the "Policlinico Paolo Giaccone", University Hospital of Palermo, Italy and Internal Medicine Unit of the "Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia- Cervello" Hospital of Palermo, Italy.
Sample size The sample size is difficult to determine as there are no studies that have evaluated the efficacy of SGLT-2i treatment in addition to diuretic therapy in the patient with liver cirrhosis and saline retention. To date, there are only a few case reports in the literature that have demonstrated its effectiveness. Considering the prospective and pilot nature of this study we decided to enroll at least 40 patients.
Study design and outcome evaluation Our project has been approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Palermo.
Patients enrolled on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria and who agreed to enter the study, after signing the informed consent, will be assigned to intervention group (group A) or control group (group B).
Patients belonging to the intervention group (A) will be given SGLT-2 inhibitors, according diabetology indications, in addition to standard medical therapy for 6 months; the patients of the control group (B) will instead continue with the only standard medical therapy for 6 months, according diabetology indications.
Standard medical therapy will include dietary sodium restriction, treatment with diuretics (furosemide and spironolactone), hypoglycemic therapy (metformin, insulin, or both) and other supportive care. Patients taking non-selective beta-blockers will continue to do.
Patients in group A and group B will be evaluated for specific clinical and laboratory parameters before the start of the study (T0) and they will subsequently be evaluated again at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months (T1, T2, T3).
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| SGLT-2i Group Patients diagnosed with Child-Turcotte-Pugh A6-B9 class Hepatic Cirrhosis (moderately impaired liver function) and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus assigned to start SGLT-2 inhibitors intake, according diabetology indications, in addition to standard medical therapy for 6 months. |
Drug: SGLT2 inhibitor
Start of SGLT-2 inhibitors to treat diabetes according diabetology indications.
|
| Standard Therapy Group Patients diagnosed with Child-Turcotte-Pugh A6-B9 class Hepatic Cirrhosis (moderately impaired liver function) and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus assigned to continue standard medical therapy, according diabetology indications, for 6 months. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Ascites control [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Ascites control, defined in terms of: Optimal control, in case of total disappearance of the ascites Reduction of the grade of ascites from grade 2 to grade 1 (i.e. ascites that is clinically undetectable, which does not determine abdominal distension and detectable only by ultrasound). Absence of response, in case of persistence of ascites of the same degree.
- Glycemic control [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Reduction of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels from baseline to the end of the study, defined as: Optimal control: HbA1C below 6.5% Good control: HbA1C between 6.5% and 6.9% Inadequate control: HbA1C between 7.0% and 8% Poor control: HbA1C above 8.0%
- SGLT-2 inhibitors safety [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Appearance of any adverse effect related to the intake of an SGLT-2 inhibitor, classified as follows: None: no adverse effects Minimal: adverse effect which does not significantly compromise the patient's state of health and which allows the continuation of the therapy Moderate: adverse effect which significantly compromises the patient's state of health and which does not allow the continuation of the therapy, managed in an outpatient setting. Severe: adverse effect which significantly compromises the patient's state of health and which does not allow the continuation of the therapy, managed in an inpatient setting. Life-threatening: adverse effect that puts the patient's life in danger and which requires the immediate interruption of therapy and hospitalization.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Fasting glucose control [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Fasting blood glucose will be evaluated by finger stick glucose auto measurement after overnight fasting in the 5 days preceding the outpatient visit, and will be classified as: - Good fasting glucose control: average of three consecutive fasting blood glucose measurement between 80-130 mg/dl. Poor glycemic control: average blood glucose measurements of three consecutive fasting blood glucose measurement >130 or <70 mg/dl
- Weight loss [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Weight reduction will be assessed by weight measurements at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months, and will be classified as: Optimal: weight loss >= 5 kg Good: 5 Kg< weight loss =< 2.5 Kg Poor: 2.5 Kg< weight loss < 0 Kg Gain: any value of weight gain
- 24-hour diuresis [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
24-hours diuresis will be assessed at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in 24- hours urinary volume Decrease: significant (p<0.05) reduction of 24- hours urinary volume Increase: significant (p<0.05) increase of 24- hours urinary volume
- Sodium excretion in the urine [From day 0 to day 180]
Fraction of sodium excretion will be evaluated on 24-hours diuresis at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in 24- hours sodium excretion Decrease: significant (p<0.05) reduction of 24- hours sodium excretion Increase: significant (p<0.05) increase of 24- hours sodium excretion
- Natremia [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Natremia will be evaluated on plasma samples at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in natremia Decrease: significant (p<0.05) reduction of natremia Increase: significant (p<0.05) increase of natremia
- Mean arterial pressure [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Mean arterial pressure will be evaluated according international guidelines of blood pressure assessment at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in mean arterial pressure Decrease: significant (p<0.05) reduction of mean arterial pressure Increase: significant (p<0.05) increase of mean arterial pressure
- Glomerular filtration rate [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Glomerular filtration rate will be evaluated according to CKD-EPI measurement at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in glomerular filtration rate Decrease: significant (p<0.05) reduction of glomerular filtration rate Increase: significant (p<0.05) increase of glomerular filtration rate
- Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
CTP score will be evaluated at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in glomerular filtration rate Reduction: decrease of at least 1 point in the CTP score Increase: increase of at least 1 point in the CTP score
- Survival [6 months]
Overall patient's survival will be evaluated after 6 months from the study enrollment
- Loop diuretics posology [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Loop diuretics posology (mg/die) will be evaluated at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in loop diuretics posology to control ascites Reduction: decrease of loop diuretics posology to control ascites Increase: increase of loop diuretics posology to control ascites
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists posology [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists diuretics posology (mg/die) will be evaluated at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists posology to control ascites Reduction: decrease of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists posology to control ascites Increase: increase of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists posology to control ascites
- Metformin posology [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Metformin (only in patients taking metformin) posology (mg/die) will be evaluated at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in metformin posology to control ascites Reduction: decrease of metformin posology to control ascites Increase: increase of metformin posology to control ascites
- Insulin bolus posology [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Insulin bolus (only in patients taking insulin) posology (mg/die) will be evaluated at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in insulin bolus posology to control ascites Reduction: decrease of insulin bolus posology to control ascites Increase: increase of insulin bolus posology to control ascites
- Insulin basal posology [Day 0, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Insulin basal (only in patients taking insulin) posology (mg/die) will be evaluated at day 0, at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and will be classified as: None: no change in insulin basal posology to control ascites Reduction: decrease of insulin basal posology to control ascites Increase: increase of insulin basal posology to control ascites
- Adverse events classification [4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months]
Putative adverse events related to SGLT-2 inhibitors intake will be classified as: Allergy: appearance of any allergic manifestation including: skin rash, itching, erythema, urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock Infectious diseases: Occurrence of any of the following conditions: Vulvovaginal candidiasis, balanitis or balanoposthitisb, urinary tract infection (including pyelonephritis and urosepsis) Metabolism disorders: hypoglycemia, dehydration, diabetic ketoacidosis, dyslipidemia, hyperkalaemia, hyperphosphoraemia Nervous system disorders: postural dizziness, syncope Vascular disorders: hypotension, orthostatic hypotension Gastrointestinal disorders: constipation, thirst, nausea Musculoskeletal system disorders: bone fracture Renal and urinary disorders: polyuria, pollakiuria, renal insufficiency (mainly in the context of hypovolemia)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age between 18 and 80 years
-
Patients diagnosed with Child-Turcotte-Pugh A6-B class Hepatic Cirrhosis (moderately impaired liver function)
-
Patients diagnosed with Hepatic Cirrhosis of viral etiology (if previous HCV infection they must be in SVR; if previous HBV infection they must have undetectable viral genome)
-
Patients diagnosed with hepatic cirrhosis of metabolic etiology
-
Patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis of alcoholic etiology (non active potus)
-
Patients with grade 1 ascites: ascites detectable only ultrasound that can be fully mobilized or controlled with diuretic therapy associated with or without moderate dietary sodium restriction
-
Grade 2 ascites: ascites that leads to a moderate abdominal distension and that recurs on at least 3 occasions within a 12-month period despite sodium restriction and adequate diuretic therapy (23)
-
Patients diagnosed with type II diabetes mellitus defined according to 2022 ADA guidelines.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Inability to obtain informed consent
-
Ascites of non-cirrhotic origin
-
Patients diagnosed with heart failure NYHA class => 2
-
Patients diagnosed with acute renal failure
-
Patients diagnosed with chronic renal failure and eGFR below 25ml/min
-
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (diagnosed according to the Barcelona criteria) or other active tumors (25)
-
Grade 3 ascites: ascites that causes marked distention of the abdomen and that cannot be mobilized or whose early recurrence (i.e. after large volume paracentesis) cannot be satisfactorily prevented by medical therapy
-
Patients diagnosed with acute Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (26)
-
Patients diagnosed with severe hepatic encephalopathy
-
Patients diagnosed with autoimmune diseases on active steroid treatment
-
Patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis due to storage diseases
-
Patients diagnosed with cirrhosis of the liver due to enzyme deficiency
-
Patients diagnosed with complete portal thrombosis
-
Patients with active sepsis
-
Pregnant or breastfeeding women
-
Patients who use drugs
-
Patients with active alcohol consumption
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Internal Medicine Unit, V. Cervello Hospital | Palermo | Italy | 90100 | |
| 2 | Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Palermo | Palermo | Italy | 90127 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Palermo
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia Cervello
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lydia Giannitrapani, MD, University of Palermo
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Angeli P, Gatta A, Caregaro L, Menon F, Sacerdoti D, Merkel C, Rondana M, de Toni R, Ruol A. Tubular site of renal sodium retention in ascitic liver cirrhosis evaluated by lithium clearance. Eur J Clin Invest. 1990 Feb;20(1):111-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1990.tb01800.x.
- Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, Schnabl B, Arroyo V. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: From peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol. 2015 Nov;63(5):1272-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
- Garcia-Compean D, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JA, Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Gonzalez-Moreno EI, Maldonado-Garza HJ, Villarreal-Perez JZ. The treatment of diabetes mellitus of patients with chronic liver disease. Ann Hepatol. 2015 Nov-Dec;14(6):780-8. doi: 10.5604/16652681.1171746.
- Santos J, Planas R, Pardo A, Durandez R, Cabre E, Morillas RM, Granada ML, Jimenez JA, Quintero E, Gassull MA. Spironolactone alone or in combination with furosemide in the treatment of moderate ascites in nonazotemic cirrhosis. A randomized comparative study of efficacy and safety. J Hepatol. 2003 Aug;39(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(03)00188-0.
- ASLG01